guest wrote:According to the not at all creepy mushymanrob, it's a very common sight to see young schoolgirls performing sexy dance routines in the playground. He has clearly done *ahem* some "research" on this subject.
Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Lol Gilbertoo's that obvious to pick out with their guest posts.
Well yes 'cos, y'know, I clearly state it's me - there's probably quite a few posts here which you no doubt think are from me, but aren't.
Not sure if it was you, but I'm still waiting to see proof of these PMs I apparently send to those who disagree with me.
Also, I'm flattered that some think I have some kind of influence over how DS is run/moderated.
Guest wrote:guest wrote:According to the not at all creepy mushymanrob, it's a very common sight to see young schoolgirls performing sexy dance routines in the playground. He has clearly done *ahem* some "research" on this subject.
When you work in a school what a surprise you see the kids playing in the playground and its common to see small groups of girls making up dance routines or copying them from music videos.
So sorry to pop your smutty innuendo. Your the one who needs to think about where your mind goes.
guest wrote:HaloJoe has been on the juice again.
Guest wrote:guest wrote:According to the not at all creepy mushymanrob, it's a very common sight to see young schoolgirls performing sexy dance routines in the playground. He has clearly done *ahem* some "research" on this subject.
When you work in a school what a surprise you see the kids playing in the playground and its common to see small groups of girls making up dance routines or copying them from music videos.
So sorry to pop your smutty innuendo. Your the one who needs to think about where your mind goes.
Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Lol Gilbertoo's that obvious to pick out with their guest posts.
Well yes 'cos, y'know, I clearly state it's me - there's probably quite a few posts here which you no doubt think are from me, but aren't.
Not sure if it was you, but I'm still waiting to see proof of these PMs I apparently send to those who disagree with me.
Also, I'm flattered that some think I have some kind of influence over how DS is run/moderated.
I'm the "Gilbertoo" spaz guest was calling out yesterday. Seems there's loads of us Gilbertoos about.
Junglejayne wrote:Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Lol Gilbertoo's that obvious to pick out with their guest posts.
Well yes 'cos, y'know, I clearly state it's me - there's probably quite a few posts here which you no doubt think are from me, but aren't.
Not sure if it was you, but I'm still waiting to see proof of these PMs I apparently send to those who disagree with me.
Also, I'm flattered that some think I have some kind of influence over how DS is run/moderated.
I'm the "Gilbertoo" spaz guest was calling out yesterday. Seems there's loads of us Gilbertoos about.
Who even uses language like this these days?
Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Lol Gilbertoo's that obvious to pick out with their guest posts.
Well yes 'cos, y'know, I clearly state it's me - there's probably quite a few posts here which you no doubt think are from me, but aren't.
Not sure if it was you, but I'm still waiting to see proof of these PMs I apparently send to those who disagree with me.
Also, I'm flattered that some think I have some kind of influence over how DS is run/moderated.
Junglejayne wrote:Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Lol Gilbertoo's that obvious to pick out with their guest posts.
Well yes 'cos, y'know, I clearly state it's me - there's probably quite a few posts here which you no doubt think are from me, but aren't.
Not sure if it was you, but I'm still waiting to see proof of these PMs I apparently send to those who disagree with me.
Also, I'm flattered that some think I have some kind of influence over how DS is run/moderated.
I'm the "Gilbertoo" spaz guest was calling out yesterday. Seems there's loads of us Gilbertoos about.
Who even uses language like this these days?
Goodwife wrote:Guest wrote:Goodwife wrote:
Not so long ago if you didn't pass the 11+ that was the end of your schooling. Even then the poor couldn't afford to keep kids in school when they could be out earning.
I haven't looked at the thread in question & didn't see Little Mix other than pics in the paper. I have seen worse outfits
Nonsense. Failing the 11+ meant that you went to a Secondary Modern instead of a Grammar School. It wasn't the "end of your schooling" at all.
Ariund the end of the first world war the minimum school leaving age was raised. Before that children would leave school and go into employment esp the poor
Guest wrote:Junglejayne wrote:Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Lol Gilbertoo's that obvious to pick out with their guest posts.
Well yes 'cos, y'know, I clearly state it's me - there's probably quite a few posts here which you no doubt think are from me, but aren't.
Not sure if it was you, but I'm still waiting to see proof of these PMs I apparently send to those who disagree with me.
Also, I'm flattered that some think I have some kind of influence over how DS is run/moderated.
I'm the "Gilbertoo" spaz guest was calling out yesterday. Seems there's loads of us Gilbertoos about.
Who even uses language like this these days?
Gilbertoo does while being high with other posters.
Guest wrote:Annette Kurtan, Mushyman, Hobbit Feet and James Fredericks have made total arses of themselves in that Little Mix sex shame thread. Them blaming a girl band for corrupting their kids based on what they wear up on a stage is just plain odd.
Have we gone back a hundred years or so? Reminds me of the prudes who thought Elvis Presley shaking his pelvis on stage was the work of the devil and their kids would be corrupted by him. Now it's Little Mix? Oh give me fucking strength.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests