DS and DTV Part 62

[NastyNickers]

faceache! Welcome to dogs.

Explosive entrance this morning, Vicky!

[Vicky]

Log in Charlie.

Oh shit

Why do people do that? It's fucking weird tbh.

Because they want other members to think people agree with them.

Anyway i've been been quiet for long enough, i am not going to let people tell lies and shit-stir about me any longer.

[Vicky]

faceache! Welcome to dogs.

Explosive entrance this morning, Vicky!

Morning Nicks.

[VR6storm]

Had to chuckle at this one...

cosmic buttplug!! Joined April 09, Visits 13,
Last Active 16/08/17 10:23

Prolific poster......

[anal guest]

Had to chuckle at this one...

cosmic buttplug!! Joined April 09, Visits 13,
Last Active 16/08/17 10:23

Prolific poster......

Probably still trying to get the buttplug out.

[HobbitFeet]

You dont have to explain yourself to the trolls Charlie. It's fairly obvious why a friend would stand up for him, especially in light of the continued and ongoing attacks and slurs on him.I don't think some posters realise just how stupid they look when they talk about his alleged 'harassment', which sounds more like people falling out to be honest and yet have no problem with the never ending harassment of him on here.

Log in Charlie.

oh dear

wonder how the gruesome twosome will spin this

and exactly how long they have been doing it for

[VR6storm]

Poor Guestypoo. Show us on the doll where Gilbertoo touched you.

Ummm... okay. Bit weird

Lambert spends his life studying DS and who posts what and how often- so he can repost over here who he thinks is a PBU. When even Trainspotters point and laugh at him and think he's a bit weird and sad you know it's gone too far.

Lamberts a good egg. And often right about PBUs. I'd like his opinion on Lukatar. Joined in June and has built up over 1000 posts. All over general like a rash, often the 2nd or 3rd poster in a thread. Thoughts on previous ID, Lamby?

Lukatar could be Paul_Jenkins back in another incarnation. Joined 9th August and over 1,000 posts already.

A slightly different posting style, yes, but the arrogance and 'know it all' demeanour is still there.....

[Vam]

You dont have to explain yourself to the trolls Charlie. It's fairly obvious why a friend would stand up for him, especially in light of the continued and ongoing attacks and slurs on him.I don't think some posters realise just how stupid they look when they talk about his alleged 'harassment', which sounds more like people falling out to be honest and yet have no problem with the never ending harassment of him on here.

Log in Charlie.

oh dear

wonder how the gruesome twosome will spin this

and exactly how long they have been doing it for

Busted, for sure. But, tbf, they're probably not the only ones doing it.

I'll hold my hands up and say I've very, very, VERY occasionally posted as a Guest here. Either because I forgot to log in before typing the post, or simply because I couldn't be arsed with the inevitable (anonymous) rage the sight of my username elicits in some people, whenever I post an opinion in this thread.

I've never used a proxy and I've never done it to back myself up though. That's just plain weird

[Vam]

Poor Guestypoo. Show us on the doll where Gilbertoo touched you.

Ummm... okay. Bit weird

Lambert spends his life studying DS and who posts what and how often- so he can repost over here who he thinks is a PBU. When even Trainspotters point and laugh at him and think he's a bit weird and sad you know it's gone too far.

Lamberts a good egg. And often right about PBUs. I'd like his opinion on Lukatar. Joined in June and has built up over 1000 posts. All over general like a rash, often the 2nd or 3rd poster in a thread. Thoughts on previous ID, Lamby?

Lukatar could be Paul_Jenkins back in another incarnation. Joined 9th August and over 1,000 posts already.

A slightly different posting style, yes, but the arrogance and 'know it all' demeanour is still there.....

A couple of posts of his have stuck in my mind, which made me think he's probably ok - as an initial impression, anyway.

He posted about taking his toddler to the park, and how the other kids ignored his little boy whenever he ran up to say "hello" and wanting to join in and play.

Beyond that, I've not really seen much of the guy

[jra]

Didn't take JRA & his Mysogyny too long to join the Engagement Ring discussion

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... nt-ring/p4

" it's like vultures hovering around a carcass regarding women, especially when it comes to feminists"

However, you've got nothing to say about the original post I quoted.

Your problem is not about my views on women regarding favoritism in legal terms, i.e. it's not misogyny you idiot. Your problem is with me, otherwise you would have said something about the poster I quoted.

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_87375971
https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_87376749

And, if you're going to have a go at me regarding misogyny you might at least attempt to spell the word correctly without a capital letter as well. It can't be that hard, surely.

Oh I agree with you. The post you quoted deserves a mention, for being full of shit. Did anyone on that thread agree with the woman being discussed in the opening post? The only post I can recall that almost did was RebelScum, and I think s/he was just stating what 'tradition' is rather than saying you should.

You know what drives me potty, you get one example of some woman being a cunt, and suddenly it turns into women being all about the money. Equating women to vultures.

And people say I take things too literally. It's some women, not all women.

You can't keep hiding behind that. It's pretty bloody obvious what you mean. You think women are vultures, out to bleed men dry. As you said in that thread.
Stop using 'some women' as a safety blanket.

You can't tell me what to do. That's your first mistake. Your second mistake is I was commenting about women on DS when you say something negative about them, not women in general. Re-read what I wrote.

QFT. I've said similar (*), that as a man many a time and it's like vultures hovering around a carcass regarding women (posting on DS !), especially when it comes to feminists.

(*) As written on DS.

! This bit added.

FFS. It's like the Spanish Inquisition regarding nitpicking and pedantry.

[VR6storm]

A couple of posts of his have stuck in my mind, which made me think he's probably ok - as an initial impression, anyway.

He posted about taking his toddler to the park, and how the other kids ignored his little boy whenever he ran up to say "hello" and wanting to join in and play.

Beyond that, I've not really seen much of the guy

He's all over DS like a rash. I mean..... 1,000 posts in less than 7 days??

[Vam]

A couple of posts of his have stuck in my mind, which made me think he's probably ok - as an initial impression, anyway.

He posted about taking his toddler to the park, and how the other kids ignored his little boy whenever he ran up to say "hello" and wanting to join in and play.

Beyond that, I've not really seen much of the guy

He's all over DS like a rash. I mean..... 1,000 posts in less than 7 days??

For real?! That's some heavy duty OCD - and yeah, now I can see shades of Jenkins, I guess.

[HobbitFeet]

You dont have to explain yourself to the trolls Charlie. It's fairly obvious why a friend would stand up for him, especially in light of the continued and ongoing attacks and slurs on him.I don't think some posters realise just how stupid they look when they talk about his alleged 'harassment', which sounds more like people falling out to be honest and yet have no problem with the never ending harassment of him on here.

Log in Charlie.

oh dear

wonder how the gruesome twosome will spin this

and exactly how long they have been doing it for

Busted, for sure. But, tbf, they're probably not the only ones doing it.

I'll hold my hands up and say I've very, very, VERY occasionally posted as a Guest here. Either because I forgot to log in before typing the post, or simply because I couldn't be arsed with the inevitable (anonymous) rage the sight of my username elicits in some people, whenever I post an opinion in this thread.

I've never used a proxy and I've never done it to back myself up though. That's just plain weird

on the odd time I've typed something and then realised I'm not logged in I've put Hobbit not logged in as my guest name

I personally don't feel the need to post without logging in intentionally, but as you say, as long as it's not done to back yourself up (or like hunter to disagree with yourself) then it's pretty benign

it all gets a bit twilight zone when you do things like Charlie has just done, who the fuck needs to be seen to have validation so much that they post as a guest to back themselves up

[Guest]

You dont have to explain yourself to the trolls Charlie. It's fairly obvious why a friend would stand up for him, especially in light of the continued and ongoing attacks and slurs on him.I don't think some posters realise just how stupid they look when they talk about his alleged 'harassment', which sounds more like people falling out to be honest and yet have no problem with the never ending harassment of him on here.

Log in Charlie.

oh dear

wonder how the gruesome twosome will spin this

and exactly how long they have been doing it for

I wonder if this will get through the mods but I posted that and I'm definitely not Charlie. Not sure what system you have for telling who is who but I guarantee you this one is wrong.

[NastyNickers]

Oh I agree with you. The post you quoted deserves a mention, for being full of shit. Did anyone on that thread agree with the woman being discussed in the opening post? The only post I can recall that almost did was RebelScum, and I think s/he was just stating what 'tradition' is rather than saying you should.

You know what drives me potty, you get one example of some woman being a cunt, and suddenly it turns into women being all about the money. Equating women to vultures.

And people say I take things too literally. It's some women, not all women.

You can't keep hiding behind that. It's pretty bloody obvious what you mean. You think women are vultures, out to bleed men dry. As you said in that thread.
Stop using 'some women' as a safety blanket.

You can't tell me what to do. That's your first mistake. Your second mistake is I was commenting about women on DS when you say something negative about them, not women in general. Re-read what I wrote.

QFT. I've said similar (*), that as a man many a time and it's like vultures hovering around a carcass regarding women (posting on DS !), especially when it comes to feminists.

(*) As written on DS.

! This bit added.

FFS. It's like the Spanish Inquisition regarding nitpicking and pedantry.

Nowhere in your post did you state you were talking about women on DS. How the buggery is anyone supposed to get that from your original post?
Nitpicking and pedantry? it would take a bloody mind reader to deduce your meaning from that post.

And anyway. It doesn't make it any better, even after you try to change the meaning.