DS and DTV Part 62

Big Threads

Re: DS and DTV Part 62

Postby jra » Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:23 am

Guest wrote:Didn't take JRA & his Mysogyny too long to join the Engagement Ring discussion

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... nt-ring/p4

" it's like vultures hovering around a carcass regarding women, especially when it comes to feminists"


However, you've got nothing to say about the original post I quoted.

Your problem is not about my views on women regarding favoritism in legal terms, i.e. it's not misogyny you idiot. Your problem is with me, otherwise you would have said something about the poster I quoted.

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_87375971
https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_87376749

And, if you're going to have a go at me regarding misogyny you might at least attempt to spell the word correctly without a capital letter as well. It can't be that hard, surely.
User avatar
jra
 
Posts: 11886
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 10:02 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 62

Postby NastyNickers » Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:35 am

jra wrote:
Guest wrote:Didn't take JRA & his Mysogyny too long to join the Engagement Ring discussion

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... nt-ring/p4

" it's like vultures hovering around a carcass regarding women, especially when it comes to feminists"


However, you've got nothing to say about the original post I quoted.

Your problem is not about my views on women regarding favoritism in legal terms, i.e. it's not misogyny you idiot. Your problem is with me, otherwise you would have said something about the poster I quoted.

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_87375971
https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_87376749

And, if you're going to have a go at me regarding misogyny you might at least attempt to spell the word correctly without a capital letter as well. It can't be that hard, surely.



Oh I agree with you. The post you quoted deserves a mention, for being full of shit. Did anyone on that thread agree with the woman being discussed in the opening post? The only post I can recall that almost did was RebelScum, and I think s/he was just stating what 'tradition' is rather than saying you should.

You know what drives me potty, you get one example of some woman being a c**t, and suddenly it turns into women being all about the money. Equating women to vultures. :shake head:
User avatar
NastyNickers
 
Posts: 6487
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2017 2:06 am

Re: DS and DTV Part 62

Postby jra » Wed Aug 16, 2017 6:58 am

NastyNickers wrote:
jra wrote:
Guest wrote:Didn't take JRA & his Mysogyny too long to join the Engagement Ring discussion

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... nt-ring/p4

" it's like vultures hovering around a carcass regarding women, especially when it comes to feminists"


However, you've got nothing to say about the original post I quoted.

Your problem is not about my views on women regarding favoritism in legal terms, i.e. it's not misogyny you idiot. Your problem is with me, otherwise you would have said something about the poster I quoted.

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_87375971
https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_87376749

And, if you're going to have a go at me regarding misogyny you might at least attempt to spell the word correctly without a capital letter as well. It can't be that hard, surely.



Oh I agree with you. The post you quoted deserves a mention, for being full of shit. Did anyone on that thread agree with the woman being discussed in the opening post? The only post I can recall that almost did was RebelScum, and I think s/he was just stating what 'tradition' is rather than saying you should.

You know what drives me potty, you get one example of some woman being a c**t, and suddenly it turns into women being all about the money. Equating women to vultures. :shake head:


And people say I take things too literally. It's some women, not all women.
User avatar
jra
 
Posts: 11886
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 10:02 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 62

Postby Guest » Wed Aug 16, 2017 7:01 am

Keyser wrote:Amazing how you state things as facts.

This has gone on since before Christmas when anonymous bagheads scented blood.

As usual you actually know nothing but because I don't want to stir things up people like you take advantage of that. Swearing at someone then apologising several times almost two years ago is not harassment, being friends with someone for years is not harassment and in the third example yet again you have no idea what went on.

I would actually say the strange behaviour is from twisted little trolls like yourself and insulting Charlie and others who agree (who fortunately don't bother posting on here) says it all.

I recognise the tactic been there done that with the psychopath.

Why not try joining and posting something positive here instead?

Nah you won't do that.


Why do you post here when you clearly hate it?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 62

Postby Guest » Wed Aug 16, 2017 7:59 am

NastyNickers wrote:
jra wrote:
Guest wrote:Didn't take JRA & his Mysogyny too long to join the Engagement Ring discussion

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... nt-ring/p4

" it's like vultures hovering around a carcass regarding women, especially when it comes to feminists"


However, you've got nothing to say about the original post I quoted.

Your problem is not about my views on women regarding favoritism in legal terms, i.e. it's not misogyny you idiot. Your problem is with me, otherwise you would have said something about the poster I quoted.

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_87375971
https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_87376749

And, if you're going to have a go at me regarding misogyny you might at least attempt to spell the word correctly without a capital letter as well. It can't be that hard, surely.



Oh I agree with you. The post you quoted deserves a mention, for being full of shit. Did anyone on that thread agree with the woman being discussed in the opening post? The only post I can recall that almost did was RebelScum, and I think s/he was just stating what 'tradition' is rather than saying you should.

You know what drives me potty, you get one example of some woman being a c**t, and suddenly it turns into women being all about the money. Equating women to vultures. :shake head:


It's no different to posters like Face ache (awaits incoming ranty defence of her) banging on about MRAs. The feminazi or extreme feminist types on DS are no different but rarely do you see people criticise them too. Just when a man does it. Hardly very equal is it.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 62

Postby Guest » Wed Aug 16, 2017 8:39 am

Guest wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:
jra wrote:
Guest wrote:Didn't take JRA & his Mysogyny too long to join the Engagement Ring discussion

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... nt-ring/p4

" it's like vultures hovering around a carcass regarding women, especially when it comes to feminists"


However, you've got nothing to say about the original post I quoted.

Your problem is not about my views on women regarding favoritism in legal terms, i.e. it's not misogyny you idiot. Your problem is with me, otherwise you would have said something about the poster I quoted.

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_87375971
https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_87376749

And, if you're going to have a go at me regarding misogyny you might at least attempt to spell the word correctly without a capital letter as well. It can't be that hard, surely.



Oh I agree with you. The post you quoted deserves a mention, for being full of shit. Did anyone on that thread agree with the woman being discussed in the opening post? The only post I can recall that almost did was RebelScum, and I think s/he was just stating what 'tradition' is rather than saying you should.

You know what drives me potty, you get one example of some woman being a c**t, and suddenly it turns into women being all about the money. Equating women to vultures. :shake head:


It's no different to posters like Face ache (awaits incoming ranty defence of her) banging on about MRAs. The feminazi or extreme feminist types on DS are no different but rarely do you see people criticise them too. Just when a man does it. Hardly very equal is it.


For the attention and to fill the long lonely hours. I feel sorry for him.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 62

Postby Guest » Wed Aug 16, 2017 10:36 am

Guest wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:
jra wrote:
Guest wrote:Didn't take JRA & his Mysogyny too long to join the Engagement Ring discussion

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... nt-ring/p4

" it's like vultures hovering around a carcass regarding women, especially when it comes to feminists"


However, you've got nothing to say about the original post I quoted.

Your problem is not about my views on women regarding favoritism in legal terms, i.e. it's not misogyny you idiot. Your problem is with me, otherwise you would have said something about the poster I quoted.

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_87375971
https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_87376749

And, if you're going to have a go at me regarding misogyny you might at least attempt to spell the word correctly without a capital letter as well. It can't be that hard, surely.



Oh I agree with you. The post you quoted deserves a mention, for being full of shit. Did anyone on that thread agree with the woman being discussed in the opening post? The only post I can recall that almost did was RebelScum, and I think s/he was just stating what 'tradition' is rather than saying you should.

You know what drives me potty, you get one example of some woman being a c**t, and suddenly it turns into women being all about the money. Equating women to vultures. :shake head:


It's no different to posters like Face ache (awaits incoming ranty defence of her) banging on about MRAs. The feminazi or extreme feminist types on DS are no different but rarely do you see people criticise them too. Just when a man does it. Hardly very equal is it.


Oh dear I've upset you haven't I. All these females stopping you from having the life you think you deserve, I can see why that would upset you poor thing.
Have a cookie :)
Much love
Face Ache ;)

ps: I have never posted here before, so when you've accused people of being me you've been wrong.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 62

Postby Guest » Wed Aug 16, 2017 11:06 am

charlie wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Grape Ape wrote:I'm not buying this attempt to make Planets out to be a hysterical female because she complained about someone harassing her. It's hardly the first time someone's complained about that person's behaviour, so rubbishing Planets isn't going to work.


The problem comes when posters try and make out falling out with people on forums or PM as something sinister or stalkerish. It's worrying how quickly people are to label others based on the sum of fuck all. It's no wonder people don't take real instances of stalking seriously or people are disbelieved when shit like this goes unchecked.

I also don't get how some seem to think certain posters on DS are beyond criticism an get so defensive. When you see what some members have put up with its fairly mild what has been said about Planets in comparison.


Maybe harassment is a better word to describe Keysers behaviour and we know he's done it to at least three women and there's probably been more and then you have the likes of Charlie who defends him to the hilt. Strange behaviour from a woman


I don't think it's strange behaviour that I defend him. I'm his friend, so of course I'm going to.

I would like to think that I'm an intelligent woman, who's able to distinguish if someone's spinning me a yarn or not.

The problem I have, is the persistent attacks towards him on events that happened months/years ago. I can only assume they're being dragged up to cause hurt, knowing that Keyser is going to take the bait.

Any rebut Keyser has, is in response to unprovoked attacks towards him.

If you're going to call someone a racist when they're not (and I know he's not) don't be surprised if they retaliate.

If anyone thinks I'm shit stirring because I'm replying - then that's a shame, as I have a right of reply, particularly if my name is mentioned.


You dont have to explain yourself to the trolls Charlie. It's fairly obvious why a friend would stand up for him, especially in light of the continued and ongoing attacks and slurs on him.I don't think some posters realise just how stupid they look when they talk about his alleged 'harassment', which sounds more like people falling out to be honest and yet have no problem with the never ending harassment of him on here.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 62

Postby Vicks » Wed Aug 16, 2017 11:42 am

Guest wrote:
charlie wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Grape Ape wrote:I'm not buying this attempt to make Planets out to be a hysterical female because she complained about someone harassing her. It's hardly the first time someone's complained about that person's behaviour, so rubbishing Planets isn't going to work.


The problem comes when posters try and make out falling out with people on forums or PM as something sinister or stalkerish. It's worrying how quickly people are to label others based on the sum of fuck all. It's no wonder people don't take real instances of stalking seriously or people are disbelieved when shit like this goes unchecked.

I also don't get how some seem to think certain posters on DS are beyond criticism an get so defensive. When you see what some members have put up with its fairly mild what has been said about Planets in comparison.


Maybe harassment is a better word to describe Keysers behaviour and we know he's done it to at least three women and there's probably been more and then you have the likes of Charlie who defends him to the hilt. Strange behaviour from a woman


I don't think it's strange behaviour that I defend him. I'm his friend, so of course I'm going to.

I would like to think that I'm an intelligent woman, who's able to distinguish if someone's spinning me a yarn or not.

The problem I have, is the persistent attacks towards him on events that happened months/years ago. I can only assume they're being dragged up to cause hurt, knowing that Keyser is going to take the bait.

Any rebut Keyser has, is in response to unprovoked attacks towards him.

If you're going to call someone a racist when they're not (and I know he's not) don't be surprised if they retaliate.

If anyone thinks I'm shit stirring because I'm replying - then that's a shame, as I have a right of reply, particularly if my name is mentioned.


You dont have to explain yourself to the trolls Charlie. It's fairly obvious why a friend would stand up for him, especially in light of the continued and ongoing attacks and slurs on him.I don't think some posters realise just how stupid they look when they talk about his alleged 'harassment', which sounds more like people falling out to be honest and yet have no problem with the never ending harassment of him on here.


Log in Charlie.

:thumbsup:
User avatar
Vicks
 
Posts: 68293
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 62

Postby Frankly » Wed Aug 16, 2017 11:45 am

Vicky wrote:
Guest wrote:
charlie wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
The problem comes when posters try and make out falling out with people on forums or PM as something sinister or stalkerish. It's worrying how quickly people are to label others based on the sum of fuck all. It's no wonder people don't take real instances of stalking seriously or people are disbelieved when shit like this goes unchecked.

I also don't get how some seem to think certain posters on DS are beyond criticism an get so defensive. When you see what some members have put up with its fairly mild what has been said about Planets in comparison.


Maybe harassment is a better word to describe Keysers behaviour and we know he's done it to at least three women and there's probably been more and then you have the likes of Charlie who defends him to the hilt. Strange behaviour from a woman


I don't think it's strange behaviour that I defend him. I'm his friend, so of course I'm going to.

I would like to think that I'm an intelligent woman, who's able to distinguish if someone's spinning me a yarn or not.

The problem I have, is the persistent attacks towards him on events that happened months/years ago. I can only assume they're being dragged up to cause hurt, knowing that Keyser is going to take the bait.

Any rebut Keyser has, is in response to unprovoked attacks towards him.

If you're going to call someone a racist when they're not (and I know he's not) don't be surprised if they retaliate.

If anyone thinks I'm shit stirring because I'm replying - then that's a shame, as I have a right of reply, particularly if my name is mentioned.


You dont have to explain yourself to the trolls Charlie. It's fairly obvious why a friend would stand up for him, especially in light of the continued and ongoing attacks and slurs on him.I don't think some posters realise just how stupid they look when they talk about his alleged 'harassment', which sounds more like people falling out to be honest and yet have no problem with the never ending harassment of him on here.


Log in Charlie.

:thumbsup:


:gigglesnshit: Good morning, Vic. :smilin:
User avatar
Frankly
 
Posts: 1938
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2014 2:23 am

Re: DS and DTV Part 62

Postby Lambert » Wed Aug 16, 2017 11:48 am

Vicky wrote:
Guest wrote:
charlie wrote:I don't think it's strange behaviour that I defend him. I'm his friend, so of course I'm going to.

I would like to think that I'm an intelligent woman, who's able to distinguish if someone's spinning me a yarn or not.

The problem I have, is the persistent attacks towards him on events that happened months/years ago. I can only assume they're being dragged up to cause hurt, knowing that Keyser is going to take the bait.

Any rebut Keyser has, is in response to unprovoked attacks towards him.

If you're going to call someone a racist when they're not (and I know he's not) don't be surprised if they retaliate.

If anyone thinks I'm shit stirring because I'm replying - then that's a shame, as I have a right of reply, particularly if my name is mentioned.


You dont have to explain yourself to the trolls Charlie. It's fairly obvious why a friend would stand up for him, especially in light of the continued and ongoing attacks and slurs on him.I don't think some posters realise just how stupid they look when they talk about his alleged 'harassment', which sounds more like people falling out to be honest and yet have no problem with the never ending harassment of him on here.


Log in Charlie.

:thumbsup:


Oh shit :pmsl:

Why do people do that? It's fucking weird tbh.
User avatar
Lambert
 
Posts: 3151
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2015 11:07 am

Re: DS and DTV Part 62

Postby jra » Wed Aug 16, 2017 11:55 am

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:
jra wrote:
Guest wrote:Didn't take JRA & his Mysogyny too long to join the Engagement Ring discussion

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... nt-ring/p4

" it's like vultures hovering around a carcass regarding women, especially when it comes to feminists"


However, you've got nothing to say about the original post I quoted.

Your problem is not about my views on women regarding favoritism in legal terms, i.e. it's not misogyny you idiot. Your problem is with me, otherwise you would have said something about the poster I quoted.

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_87375971
https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_87376749

And, if you're going to have a go at me regarding misogyny you might at least attempt to spell the word correctly without a capital letter as well. It can't be that hard, surely.



Oh I agree with you. The post you quoted deserves a mention, for being full of shit. Did anyone on that thread agree with the woman being discussed in the opening post? The only post I can recall that almost did was RebelScum, and I think s/he was just stating what 'tradition' is rather than saying you should.

You know what drives me potty, you get one example of some woman being a c**t, and suddenly it turns into women being all about the money. Equating women to vultures. :shake head:


It's no different to posters like Face ache (awaits incoming ranty defence of her) banging on about MRAs. The feminazi or extreme feminist types on DS are no different but rarely do you see people criticise them too. Just when a man does it. Hardly very equal is it.


For the attention and to fill the long lonely hours. I feel sorry for him.


Honestly, you don't need to be, but thanks for the concern. :roll: It's not a case of not going out as much, but not needing to go out, because I've done almost all of it before, but nice try.
User avatar
jra
 
Posts: 11886
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 10:02 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 62

Postby NastyNickers » Wed Aug 16, 2017 12:03 pm

jra wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:
jra wrote:
Guest wrote:Didn't take JRA & his Mysogyny too long to join the Engagement Ring discussion

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... nt-ring/p4

" it's like vultures hovering around a carcass regarding women, especially when it comes to feminists"


However, you've got nothing to say about the original post I quoted.

Your problem is not about my views on women regarding favoritism in legal terms, i.e. it's not misogyny you idiot. Your problem is with me, otherwise you would have said something about the poster I quoted.

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_87375971
https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_87376749

And, if you're going to have a go at me regarding misogyny you might at least attempt to spell the word correctly without a capital letter as well. It can't be that hard, surely.



Oh I agree with you. The post you quoted deserves a mention, for being full of shit. Did anyone on that thread agree with the woman being discussed in the opening post? The only post I can recall that almost did was RebelScum, and I think s/he was just stating what 'tradition' is rather than saying you should.

You know what drives me potty, you get one example of some woman being a c**t, and suddenly it turns into women being all about the money. Equating women to vultures. :shake head:


And people say I take things too literally. It's some women, not all women.


You can't keep hiding behind that. It's pretty bloody obvious what you mean. You think women are vultures, out to bleed men dry. As you said in that thread.
Stop using 'some women' as a safety blanket.
User avatar
NastyNickers
 
Posts: 6487
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2017 2:06 am

Re: DS and DTV Part 62

Postby Vicks » Wed Aug 16, 2017 12:08 pm

Frankly wrote:
Vicky wrote:

Log in Charlie.

:thumbsup:


:gigglesnshit: Good morning, Vic. :smilin:


Image Morning Franks.
User avatar
Vicks
 
Posts: 68293
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 62

Postby NastyNickers » Wed Aug 16, 2017 12:10 pm

Guest wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:
jra wrote:
Guest wrote:Didn't take JRA & his Mysogyny too long to join the Engagement Ring discussion

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... nt-ring/p4

" it's like vultures hovering around a carcass regarding women, especially when it comes to feminists"


However, you've got nothing to say about the original post I quoted.

Your problem is not about my views on women regarding favoritism in legal terms, i.e. it's not misogyny you idiot. Your problem is with me, otherwise you would have said something about the poster I quoted.

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_87375971
https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_87376749

And, if you're going to have a go at me regarding misogyny you might at least attempt to spell the word correctly without a capital letter as well. It can't be that hard, surely.



Oh I agree with you. The post you quoted deserves a mention, for being full of shit. Did anyone on that thread agree with the woman being discussed in the opening post? The only post I can recall that almost did was RebelScum, and I think s/he was just stating what 'tradition' is rather than saying you should.

You know what drives me potty, you get one example of some woman being a c**t, and suddenly it turns into women being all about the money. Equating women to vultures. :shake head:


It's no different to posters like Face ache (awaits incoming ranty defence of her) banging on about MRAs. The feminazi or extreme feminist types on DS are no different but rarely do you see people criticise them too. Just when a man does it. Hardly very equal is it.


There's only a couple of what I'd would consider an extreme feminist on DS, and faceache isn't on of them. I think I probably lurk the equality threads most (which is why I've usually got an opinion on them), and I can't say I've seen faceache in them all that much. No more than other posters, certainly less than the likes of Retford and Stoatie.

Having said all that. I have seen plenty of people criticising women, as much as men. If a woman is in the wrong posters will pick up on it. I have a feeling though your idea and my idea of a woman being in the wrong are completely different, and it's there thenproblem lies. :wink:
User avatar
NastyNickers
 
Posts: 6487
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2017 2:06 am

PreviousNext

Return to The Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests