Re: DS and DTV Part 65

Big Threads

Re: DS and DTV Part 65

Postby Guest » Sun Sep 24, 2017 8:31 pm

Vam wrote:
jp761 wrote:My summary of the DS advice section.

It does seem to be the same names that pop up over and over in thread after thread, 3/4 people mainly. I have some previous experience of it over recent years. And you only have to take a look at a few threads over there. These few people are almost always extremely agreeable towards each other's views. But seem to go on the offensive very quickly when it comes to other FMs views. Look at what happened to vam yesterday in that thread within seconds, that was a joke, she basically wasn't allowed to post. That was the impression given at least. Sod that though these people wont stop everyone posting, however much they want to.

The reaction system must have been a godsend they can just agree with each other all day long making them appear wise old owls and genius like. lol

It really is no wonder that you usually only see the same low number of names posting in that section, on a regular basis.

DS really has gone down the pan, when compared to around 2012 and previous to that.

I've also had a chat with ds admin regarding the 'apparent' message someone sent them, saying I should be banned from advice. Two can play at that juvenile game, if need be.


Of course I was "allowed to post"! :gigglesnshit: I think what you mean is that from the moment I posted that I thought I could (kind of) understand the point you had been trying to make, despite Annette continuously feigning 'confusion', her uber defensive, hair trigger temper was unleashed.

She then started making it very personal, slagging off Dogs and lying about you and me discussing her here. Which, of course, we weren't :roll:

If only the befuddled mare knew how many times you and I have... 'crossed paths'! :gigglesnshit:

She knows where to come if she wants to gave a go. Playing the victim over there, baiting and trolling and mentioning Dogs whenever it suits her is not an option. In theory, everyone at DS should play by the same rules, right? "Discuss the post, not the poster..." etc.

So when I'd had enough of her whining and personal comments to me, I simply asked the Mods there to clean up her shitposting in that thread. Which they did.







DISCUSS THE POST, NOT THE POSTER and here you are doing the exact opposite.
And then you admit to running to admin. What a class act you are lol
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 65

Postby Guest » Sun Sep 24, 2017 8:34 pm

Vam wrote:
Guest wrote:
jp761 wrote:My summary of the DS advice section.

It does seem to be the same names that pop up over and over in thread after thread, 3/4 people mainly. I have some previous experience of it over recent years. And you only have to take a look at a few threads over there. These few people are almost always extremely agreeable towards each other's views. But seem to go on the offensive very quickly when it comes to other FMs views. Look at what happened to vam yesterday in that thread within seconds, that was a joke, she basically wasn't allowed to post. That was the impression given at least. Sod that though these people wont stop everyone posting, however much they want to.

The reaction system must have been a godsend they can just agree with each other all day long making them appear wise old owls and genius like. lol

It really is no wonder that you usually only see the same low number of names posting in that section, on a regular basis.

DS really has gone down the pan, when compared to around 2012 and previous to that.

I've also had a chat with ds admin regarding the 'apparent' message someone sent them, saying I should be banned from advice. Two can play at that juvenile game, if need be.


JP and Vam, what a great pairing haha

So Vam isn't allowed to post in advice eh? And all without a pm to the mods haha

Well it's sort of sweet to see the pair of you watching each other's backs. I'm sure you two socially awkward and inadequate scamps will find your partnership just peachy for a very short time haha

Finally JP remind us all about the great and insightful advice you've directly given to the OP in that thread cos I can't see any. Maybe it was deleted haha


Sit down, luv, and give what passes for your brain a rest :Wiiiine!:

All this fricking drama from you and that off-her-face bint, just because I made O N E post saying that I could (kind of) follow what JP was saying in that thread.

Geez, you people must have so little to occupy you in life, if inconsequential crap like this excites you so damn much! :mrgreen:





What occupies your life then, since you're the one writing the inconsequential crap.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 65

Postby jp761 » Sun Sep 24, 2017 9:00 pm

Guest wrote:
jp761 wrote:My summary of the DS advice section.

It does seem to be the same names that pop up over and over in thread after thread, 3/4 people mainly. I have some previous experience of it over recent years. And you only have to take a look at a few threads over there. These few people are almost always extremely agreeable towards each other's views. But seem to go on the offensive very quickly when it comes to other FMs views. Look at what happened to vam yesterday in that thread within seconds, that was a joke, she basically wasn't allowed to post. That was the impression given at least. Sod that though these people wont stop everyone posting, however much they want to.

The reaction system must have been a godsend they can just agree with each other all day long making them appear wise old owls and genius like. lol

It really is no wonder that you usually only see the same low number of names posting in that section, on a regular basis.

DS really has gone down the pan, when compared to around 2012 and previous to that.

I've also had a chat with ds admin regarding the 'apparent' message someone sent them, saying I should be banned from advice. Two can play at that juvenile game, if need be.


Here's some advice for you ya boring little cunt; Stop being a snivelling little imp on forums and you might get a girlfriend and stop following women around online. Weird little tosspot.
Oh dear.. you had zero affect on me.

Oh... apart from making me laugh. :thumbsup:
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 7966
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 65

Postby jp761 » Sun Sep 24, 2017 9:03 pm

Hey anyone quoting my posts giving it the bullshit you are wasting your time. Just so you realise.
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 7966
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 65

Postby jp761 » Sun Sep 24, 2017 9:05 pm

@guest that wasn't post 58. :more beer:
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 7966
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 65

Postby Vam » Sun Sep 24, 2017 9:08 pm

Guest wrote:
DISCUSS THE POST, NOT THE POSTER
and here you are doing the exact opposite.
And then you admit to running to admin. What a class act you are lol


Isn't that supposed to be the mantra over there? :dunno:

It's different here, Zipperhead. Here is for trolling. Otherwise, why else would you be here? :trollface:

(lol)
Last edited by Vam on Sun Sep 24, 2017 9:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Vam
 
Posts: 19294
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 9:57 am

Re: DS and DTV Part 65

Postby jp761 » Sun Sep 24, 2017 9:10 pm

Ok after checking just now.. post 57 was the one I was referring to. It was 58 when I last looked, that's why I said 58 at the time. :thumbsup:

I guess the mods have recently deleted a few more of the 'creepy' posts. :thumbsup:
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 7966
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 65

Postby Guest » Sun Sep 24, 2017 9:12 pm

Guest wrote:
Vam wrote:
Guest wrote:
jp761 wrote:My summary of the DS advice section.

It does seem to be the same names that pop up over and over in thread after thread, 3/4 people mainly. I have some previous experience of it over recent years. And you only have to take a look at a few threads over there. These few people are almost always extremely agreeable towards each other's views. But seem to go on the offensive very quickly when it comes to other FMs views. Look at what happened to vam yesterday in that thread within seconds, that was a joke, she basically wasn't allowed to post. That was the impression given at least. Sod that though these people wont stop everyone posting, however much they want to.

The reaction system must have been a godsend they can just agree with each other all day long making them appear wise old owls and genius like. lol

It really is no wonder that you usually only see the same low number of names posting in that section, on a regular basis.

DS really has gone down the pan, when compared to around 2012 and previous to that.

I've also had a chat with ds admin regarding the 'apparent' message someone sent them, saying I should be banned from advice. Two can play at that juvenile game, if need be.


JP and Vam, what a great pairing haha

So Vam isn't allowed to post in advice eh? And all without a pm to the mods haha

Well it's sort of sweet to see the pair of you watching each other's backs. I'm sure you two socially awkward and inadequate scamps will find your partnership just peachy for a very short time haha

Finally JP remind us all about the great and insightful advice you've directly given to the OP in that thread cos I can't see any. Maybe it was deleted haha


Sit down, luv, and give what passes for your brain a rest :Wiiiine!:

All this fricking drama from you and that off-her-face bint, just because I made O N E post saying that I could (kind of) follow what JP was saying in that thread.

Geez, you people must have so little to occupy you in life, if inconsequential crap like this excites you so damn much! :mrgreen:





What occupies your life then, since you're the one writing the inconsequential crap.


We shouldn't expect an intelligent response.

But I wonder if JP will have anything to say.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 65

Postby jp761 » Sun Sep 24, 2017 9:26 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Vam wrote:
Guest wrote:
jp761 wrote:My summary of the DS advice section.

It does seem to be the same names that pop up over and over in thread after thread, 3/4 people mainly. I have some previous experience of it over recent years. And you only have to take a look at a few threads over there. These few people are almost always extremely agreeable towards each other's views. But seem to go on the offensive very quickly when it comes to other FMs views. Look at what happened to vam yesterday in that thread within seconds, that was a joke, she basically wasn't allowed to post. That was the impression given at least. Sod that though these people wont stop everyone posting, however much they want to.

The reaction system must have been a godsend they can just agree with each other all day long making them appear wise old owls and genius like. lol

It really is no wonder that you usually only see the same low number of names posting in that section, on a regular basis.

DS really has gone down the pan, when compared to around 2012 and previous to that.

I've also had a chat with ds admin regarding the 'apparent' message someone sent them, saying I should be banned from advice. Two can play at that juvenile game, if need be.


JP and Vam, what a great pairing haha

So Vam isn't allowed to post in advice eh? And all without a pm to the mods haha

Well it's sort of sweet to see the pair of you watching each other's backs. I'm sure you two socially awkward and inadequate scamps will find your partnership just peachy for a very short time haha

Finally JP remind us all about the great and insightful advice you've directly given to the OP in that thread cos I can't see any. Maybe it was deleted haha


Sit down, luv, and give what passes for your brain a rest :Wiiiine!:

All this fricking drama from you and that off-her-face bint, just because I made O N E post saying that I could (kind of) follow what JP was saying in that thread.

Geez, you people must have so little to occupy you in life, if inconsequential crap like this excites you so damn much! :mrgreen:





What occupies your life then, since you're the one writing the inconsequential crap.


We shouldn't expect an intelligent response.

But I wonder if JP will have anything to say.
Yeah.. stop fantasising you think too much.
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 7966
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 65

Postby Guest » Sun Sep 24, 2017 9:41 pm

Guest wrote: Yeah, I said the same a few pages ago - his party loyalty is all-important to him, even if it requires him to deny his own sexuality. He's not the first self-hating gay man on DS; during the debate on legalising gay marriage there were quite a few who were opposed to it. I can understand them being indifferent if they themselves had no desire to marry, but denying that right to those who do is frankly bizarre. It's just as homophobic as the fundy-Christians' attitude is. Actually, when I think about it, I'm sure that one of the most outspoken gay opponents was none other than Trevgo.


Wizzywick was 100% gay about 5 years ago and a quick look through the Madonna threads for that time period will prove it.

At some point he became str8 and involved with a woman he always referred to as his partner. So maybe he is bisexual. I thinks its more likely he forget which account he was logged in under one day and had no choice but to stuck with the final story.

The problem with Wizzywick is that he would change that story to aid what ever argument he was involved in so the bulk of what he posted about his personal life was probably shite.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 65

Postby Odessa Steps » Sun Sep 24, 2017 9:43 pm

Guest wrote:
You know Odessa. He loves his little lists. :cuppaT:


Hehehe oh yes you have me there Guest :smilin: Yep... I'm a notorious prolifc list maker... I mean there is the Long Term Labour Voter list that has popped sand in your vagina and there was... errm... oh wait you're the whiney bitch Guest who was claiming the DTV list was created by me and Puzzler... when in fact it wasn't...

So... two lists... semantically one little list and one larger one I didn't compile just posted several times in early 2014. Well everyone knows me.. list mad.

Two lists in three years... that is a real list habit I have...

Or maybe Guest you just have a surprisingly low tolerance for lists... perhaps you go through the day list avoiding because the sight of a list and you wet the bed.... some kind of list induced incontinence? Yeah... I'd probs cry salty tears and remember both lists somone had posted in three years if every time one appears you have to sit on a carrier bag till you dried out.

On the other hand I;m imagining the DTV list I never compiled but clings to your memories like a pair of soiled undies is particuarly fresh because you were on it... and even now after three years you are still butthurt that it ever appeared and have to whine and bitch abour it. Awwww.... poor poor 'iddle DTV whinger.... :dafinger:
User avatar
Odessa Steps
 
Posts: 3606
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 7:53 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 65

Postby Guest » Sun Sep 24, 2017 9:55 pm

Mesostim AKA Odessa Steps, Great take down of Network Babe on her amazing transformation from Ultra Remainer and supporter of the EU to Ultra Brexiter and despiser of everything connected to the EU.
Very noticeable that she didn't have an answer for you and hasn't replied to explain why she's flushed all of her previous rationale down the toilet and become a major gobshite.
Has anyone reminded her that last October she was saying Philip Hammond was the only adult in the room in relation to his caution over the single market. Her dramatic pendulum swing in such a short space of time loses her some respect.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 65

Postby Odessa Steps » Sun Sep 24, 2017 9:57 pm

Guest wrote:
Yeah, I said the same a few pages ago - his party loyalty is all-important to him, even if it requires him to deny his own sexuality. He's not the first self-hating gay man on DS; during the debate on legalising gay marriage there were quite a few who were opposed to it. I can understand them being indifferent if they themselves had no desire to marry, but denying that right to those who do is frankly bizarre. It's just as homophobic as the fundy-Christians' attitude is. Actually, when I think about it, I'm sure that one of the most outspoken gay opponents was none other than Trevgo.


Yep Trevgo tinged my radar pretty hard claiming to be gay... indeed he claimed to run a "gay business"... but then argued with a passion against gay rights. He also voted UKIP then turned into a weird satire of a remainer. In fact the only person more confusingly inconsistant in their opinions than Trevgo is Thenetworkbabe who reads like a map of the Paris underground.
User avatar
Odessa Steps
 
Posts: 3606
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 7:53 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 65

Postby Guest » Sun Sep 24, 2017 9:58 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote: Yeah, I said the same a few pages ago - his party loyalty is all-important to him, even if it requires him to deny his own sexuality. He's not the first self-hating gay man on DS; during the debate on legalising gay marriage there were quite a few who were opposed to it. I can understand them being indifferent if they themselves had no desire to marry, but denying that right to those who do is frankly bizarre. It's just as homophobic as the fundy-Christians' attitude is. Actually, when I think about it, I'm sure that one of the most outspoken gay opponents was none other than Trevgo.


Wizzywick was 100% gay about 5 years ago and a quick look through the Madonna threads for that time period will prove it.

At some point he became str8 and involved with a woman he always referred to as his partner. So maybe he is bisexual. I thinks its more likely he forget which account he was logged in under one day and had no choice but to stuck with the final story.

The problem with Wizzywick is that he would change that story to aid what ever argument he was involved in so the bulk of what he posted about his personal life was probably shite.


Wizzywick hasn't always been such a prolific poster on the politics forum I don't think? Perhaps he only tried to alter or hide his established gay status once he found it unhelpful in the politics forum promoting the tories?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 65

Postby Guest » Sun Sep 24, 2017 10:04 pm

Odessa Steps wrote:
Guest wrote:
You know Odessa. He loves his little lists. :cuppaT:


Hehehe oh yes you have me there Guest :smilin: Yep... I'm a notorious prolifc list maker... I mean there is the Long Term Labour Voter list that has popped sand in your vagina and there was... errm... oh wait you're the whiney bitch Guest who was claiming the DTV list was created by me and Puzzler... when in fact it wasn't...

So... two lists... semantically one little list and one larger one I didn't compile just posted several times in early 2014. Well everyone knows me.. list mad.

Two lists in three years... that is a real list habit I have...

Or maybe Guest you just have a surprisingly low tolerance for lists... perhaps you go through the day list avoiding because the sight of a list and you wet the bed.... some kind of list induced incontinence? Yeah... I'd probs cry salty tears and remember both lists somone had posted in three years if every time one appears you have to sit on a carrier bag till you dried out.

On the other hand I;m imagining the DTV list I never compiled but clings to your memories like a pair of soiled undies is particuarly fresh because you were on it... and even now after three years you are still butthurt that it ever appeared and have to whine and bitch abour it. Awwww.... poor poor 'iddle DTV whinger.... :dafinger:


Someone hit a raw nerve! :pmsl:
User avatar
Guest
 

PreviousNext

Return to The Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests