DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Big Threads

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby Guest » Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:35 pm

I hear on the grapevine the BBC aren't happy that people on the soap forum suggested John Yorke was some big homophobic. I never saw the comments myself but I wonder if DS have been forced to ban those who said it?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby Guest » Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:52 pm

Keyser Did you manage to stay in touch with the joy of pat? One of the lovely ones on the soap forum.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby Guest » Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:56 pm

Guest wrote:I hear on the grapevine the BBC aren't happy that people on the soap forum suggested John Yorke was some big homophobic. I never saw the comments myself but I wonder if DS have been forced to ban those who said it?


Who has been banned from the soap forum recently?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby Guest » Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:02 pm

Feline wrote:Some very crass and uninformed opinions on the Hollywood sexual abuse allegations thread.

:slap: :slap:


Numbertwats victim blaming?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby Guest » Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:04 pm

You don't agree with me = you haven't read my post properly.

JP :bawlin: :bawlin: :bawlin:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby Guest » Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:11 pm

Feline wrote:Some very crass and uninformed opinions on the Hollywood sexual abuse allegations thread.

:slap: :slap:


With JP well among them. :slap: :slap:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby Guest » Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:12 pm

Vam wrote:
Guest wrote:
Why has it taken you so long to slag off guest posting? Why aren't you lobbying to have it stopped?


:roll: I've never done that, so why the hell would I start now?

The majority of Guests are fine, and I've often said the place wouldn't be the same without them.

But I do feel total contempt for the few gutless shits, who are clearly clinging to bitter, centuries-old grudges, and who exploit the Guest facility here to anonymously puke out their lies and venom.


You just didn't like that guests pointed out how you liked to throw your weight around here thats all

You've calmed down a bit since It was pointed out :thumbsup:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby Guest » Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:26 pm

Guest wrote:
Feline wrote:Some very crass and uninformed opinions on the Hollywood sexual abuse allegations thread.

:slap: :slap:


Numbertwats victim blaming?


And in jail! :yess:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby Odessa Steps » Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:27 pm

Guest wrote:
Hobbit Feet/ Fuck Goblin or whatever persona she’s using today, doesn’t have it in her to calm down. She’ll never change that inner freak and nasty streak she has. Her attack on JRA saying he wanks in a bedsit was a major misfire when you consider her own background. But of an own goal really.


Apart from her recent policy on misinterpreting my motives I've always quite liked Hobbit Feet
Really quite dreadful...
User avatar
Odessa Steps
 
Posts: 2452
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 8:53 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby Guest » Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:36 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Feline wrote:Some very crass and uninformed opinions on the Hollywood sexual abuse allegations thread.

:slap: :slap:


Numbertwats victim blaming?


And in jail! :yess:


I'd ban his ass just for being him and as offensive has his opinion on that thread is I didn't see anything jail worthy.

What you do Jippy?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby jp761 » Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:48 pm

Guest wrote:Jp talking about women is ironic. Kinda like when Micky was doing his Swiss Toni act.
What is hilarious is, you have a situation on DS where when certain subjects come up, a few people only want themselves to contribute in that particular thread. It really isn't good for debate. It is funny though.

By the way what I have specifically said that you disagree with?
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 2982
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 7:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby jp761 » Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:50 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Feline wrote:Some very crass and uninformed opinions on the Hollywood sexual abuse allegations thread.

:slap: :slap:


Numbertwats victim blaming?


And in jail! :yess:


I'd ban his ass just for being him and as offensive has his opinion on that thread is I didn't see anything jail worthy.

What you do Jippy?
Haha funny.

Someone is having a good cry right now that's what I did.
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 2982
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 7:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby jp761 » Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:54 pm

Guest wrote:You don't agree with me = you haven't read my post properly.

JP :bawlin: :bawlin: :bawlin:
Oh I don't fall for the tactic of FMs picking out one sentence or a few words from a post and centering on it. Stirring and twisting it's just bullshit. So yeah some people don't read posts properly.
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 2982
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 7:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby guest » Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:54 pm

Guest wrote:
Feline wrote:Some very crass and uninformed opinions on the Hollywood sexual abuse allegations thread.

:slap: :slap:


Numbertwats victim blaming?


I don't think he's as bad as all that but he really is being a tosser in that thread. The blame does not rest on the groped and assaulted young actresses who feared a powerful mogul who seemed pretty untouchable (despite his reputation and repeated complaints to the police nothing happened) and the abuse, mockery and ruined career that often comes with speaking out. You don't have to look far to find the attitudes of "they knew what they were getting into" "they are lying" and "they just want money" after all. Despite what certain people often say, women are not automatically believed or sympathised with.
User avatar
guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby Guest » Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:54 pm

jp761 wrote:
Guest wrote:
I'd ban his ass just for being him and as offensive has his opinion on that thread is I didn't see anything jail worthy.

What you do Jippy?
Haha funny.

Someone is having a good cry right now that's what I did.


You're the one in jail.
User avatar
Guest
 

PreviousNext

Return to The Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron