DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Big Threads

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby Guest » Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:17 am

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Lambert wrote:
Guest wrote:Has Safi been staying in cheap hotels?


I don't get this one.


I think it's cause she used to moan a lot on DS and that she's meant to be plus size. I know she used to moan a lot, but have no idea of her weight.


I don’t recall her moaning a lot. You must have a selective memory. She always seemed alright to me. And she never said she was plus size, just not a skinny minnie. Who the fuck would want one of them anyway?

JP has spoken a lot of sense. As for the guest trying to bait GD, you’re a moronic twat. He obviously isn’t going to rise to the bait. You’re the one who looks like a pathetic twat. :bum:


Most men would rather have a slim woman over an obese one.


They don’t even need to be obese. Most men would prefer a slim woman to a chubby one. There’s a lot of people out there trying to make out the opposite but it’s simply not true. People say they like something to grab onto but you can still be slim and have boobs and an ass.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby Guest » Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:21 am

Lady Murasaki wrote:
Vam wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:
HobbitFeet wrote:
I think whoever you are you need to get a grip

I posted in that thread when nobody else was around, perhaps you should check the post times before you start throwing your accusations about - before you were banned from DS you had no problem having a go at posters in threads over there with the back up of your 'pal', before he defected to DTV that is - he was blinded by your ever so passionate claims of being picked on, but he soon saw that there is always two sides to a story

I'm not sure why you have reinvented yourself as the saviour of all those 'poor downtrodden' posters but plenty of people remember your DS career

I am not going to stop posting in threads that interest me just because other people that feel the same way are posting too, they can come and go and frankly I don't give a shit whether they are there are not - and unlike you did, I don't cry for backup


Who's crying for backup? I'm talking about having an even playing field not secretly bitching about someone on another forum.

No ones poor or downtrodden, unless they need a 'gang' to back them up. Then they are pretty pitiful.


But that's just it - there's nothing secretive going on here :dunno:

The existence of Dogs, and this particular thread, is fairly common knowledge over at DS. You'll quite often see members mention Dogs in their posts there.

Everything posted here is quite easily accessible and freely viewable to all. There's nothing underhand about it.

How else do you imagine DS members have found their way over here? At Dogs they can post more freely, minus the constraints of the bizarre moderation at DS.


You're right, it's not secretive.

I'll take that part back.


I agree with everything you have said Lady M so don’t worry about the backlash from them. The only surprise to me is that you haven’t noticed those posters being cunts and bitching in teams for yonks in here now. I agree it’s cowardly and can seem like a form of ganging up or bullying and most wouldn’t dare to try and act in a similar way on DS as they know they’d get banned.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby Helena » Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:24 am

Ja Ich bin gern die Farben Guest wrote:
Guest wrote: EEEW!! Your brown tongue interacting with Keyser's verdigris-covered knob!! Fuck, even Youporn wouldn't want to put that out for the public to see, they do have some standards to maintain.

Disgusting post but props for using verdigris, a very interesting colour.

Image

Always very nice on cupolas, against a cerulean sky.


That's the exact colour of my kitchen walls.
User avatar
Helena
 
Posts: 620
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2016 5:16 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby Guest » Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:25 am

jra wrote:
HobbitFeet wrote:
Guest wrote:
HobbitFeet wrote:I will say what I don't like is the go to position of clicking the laugh icon after all of Bolly's posts, it's always the same sort of number so I presume it's the same few people systematically downvoting irrespective of the content

it's petty and pathetic

in fairness she can make some points that certainly deserve debate, but she doesn't seem to want debate just to derail (to prove her dodgy points using increasingly dodgy links and tactics) and to go round in ever decreasing circles until the thread explodes with frustration


Many of the comments on here from you and others are petty and pathetic too so pot kettle here.

Did you want debate when you made your wanking in bed sit comment the other day? You are Such a hypocrite Hobbit.



you don't know the difference between here and DS?

stupid guest makes stupid comment shocker


You make a crab look an amateur at sidestepping.

Zing! Who knew that JRA had such a sense of humour! Great line JRA. :laughing:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby jra » Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:34 am

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Lambert wrote:
Guest wrote:Has Safi been staying in cheap hotels?


I don't get this one.


I think it's cause she used to moan a lot on DS and that she's meant to be plus size. I know she used to moan a lot, but have no idea of her weight.


I don’t recall her moaning a lot. You must have a selective memory. She always seemed alright to me. And she never said she was plus size, just not a skinny minnie. Who the fuck would want one of them anyway?

JP has spoken a lot of sense. As for the guest trying to bait GD, you’re a moronic twat. He obviously isn’t going to rise to the bait. You’re the one who looks like a pathetic twat. :bum:


Most men would rather have a slim woman over an obese one.


And there is in-between.
User avatar
jra
 
Posts: 18197
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 9:02 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby jra » Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:38 am

Guest wrote:
jra wrote:
HobbitFeet wrote:
Guest wrote:
HobbitFeet wrote:I will say what I don't like is the go to position of clicking the laugh icon after all of Bolly's posts, it's always the same sort of number so I presume it's the same few people systematically downvoting irrespective of the content

it's petty and pathetic

in fairness she can make some points that certainly deserve debate, but she doesn't seem to want debate just to derail (to prove her dodgy points using increasingly dodgy links and tactics) and to go round in ever decreasing circles until the thread explodes with frustration


Many of the comments on here from you and others are petty and pathetic too so pot kettle here.

Did you want debate when you made your wanking in bed sit comment the other day? You are Such a hypocrite Hobbit.



you don't know the difference between here and DS?

stupid guest makes stupid comment shocker


You make a crab look an amateur at sidestepping.

Zing! Who knew that JRA had such a sense of humour! Great line JRA. :laughing:


Thanks. I have a very good sense of humour by all accounts, but often don't portray it or it doesn't come across like that on the forums. It's the way you tell them as they say.
User avatar
jra
 
Posts: 18197
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 9:02 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby NastyNickers » Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:45 am

Canucklehead wrote:There's lot of variation between size 6 and not being able to see your feet. Many women will fall under the plus-size umbrella and not be anywhere near the taking up two bus seats category.

As jp said, the people going on about the weight thing are probably trying to goad certain DS members into taking the bait. Why on Earth they care about someone's weight is beyond me. It's just a lazy go-to insult for the intellectually inadequate. Like the hotel owner in the news story from Blackpool posted on DS.


Perfectly said!

There's loads of variations. People carry fat differently, and height/length can distribute it differently. Weight insults fuck me right off, and they can be so fucking damaging.
User avatar
NastyNickers
 
Posts: 9501
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2017 1:06 am

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby jra » Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:47 am

Vicky wrote:
Guest wrote:
I don’t recall her moaning a lot. You must have a selective memory. She always seemed alright to me. And she never said she was plus size, just not a skinny minnie. Who the fuck would want one of them anyway?

JP has spoken a lot of sense. As for the guest trying to bait GD, you’re a moronic twat. He obviously isn’t going to rise to the bait. You’re the one who looks like a pathetic twat. :bum:


As woman's who's a size six, I like being a "A Skinny Minnie" as you put it.

I can see my feet, I don't need to buy clothes that look like tents and i don't take up two seats on the bus.

That's why the fuck i like being a "Skinny Minnie"

:dafinger:


That's fine, but you have to be pretty big to take up two seats.
User avatar
jra
 
Posts: 18197
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 9:02 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby Lady Murasaki » Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:47 am

Thanks guest. I don't worry about the backlash, it's all bs designed to shut up dissenters. The irony is I often agree with their PoV on DS but not the underhanded way they try to shut people down.
User avatar
Lady Murasaki
 
Posts: 37246
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:46 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby Guest » Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:49 am

NastyNickers wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:There's lot of variation between size 6 and not being able to see your feet. Many women will fall under the plus-size umbrella and not be anywhere near the taking up two bus seats category.

As jp said, the people going on about the weight thing are probably trying to goad certain DS members into taking the bait. Why on Earth they care about someone's weight is beyond me. It's just a lazy go-to insult for the intellectually inadequate. Like the hotel owner in the news story from Blackpool posted on DS.


Perfectly said!

There's loads of variations. People carry fat differently, and height/length can distribute it differently. Weight insults fuck me right off, and they can be so fucking damaging.


Yet we had less people complain when posters called JP skinny or Jason Watkins fat. To many it was seen as a joke so not sure why people are getting so bent out of shape this time round.

I agree that the comments designed to goad GD are pathetic but then the skinny runt jabs at JP are too.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby Vicky » Wed Oct 11, 2017 9:21 am

jra wrote:
Vicky wrote:
Guest wrote:
I don’t recall her moaning a lot. You must have a selective memory. She always seemed alright to me. And she never said she was plus size, just not a skinny minnie. Who the fuck would want one of them anyway?

JP has spoken a lot of sense. As for the guest trying to bait GD, you’re a moronic twat. He obviously isn’t going to rise to the bait. You’re the one who looks like a pathetic twat. :bum:


As woman's who's a size six, I like being a "A Skinny Minnie" as you put it.

I can see my feet, I don't need to buy clothes that look like tents and i don't take up two seats on the bus.

That's why the fuck i like being a "Skinny Minnie"

:dafinger:


That's fine, but you have to be pretty big to take up two seats.


Yes i know.

I was just pissed off at the guest who implied being "Skinny" was some kind of terrible affliction.

What i have noticed is, it's always the one's who never have the guts to post their own photos, who have the most to say about other people's looks.

Before i posted my photo i was called fat, then when i posted my photo i was called anorexic.

It's pathetic.
User avatar
Vicky
 
Posts: 68337
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 12:26 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby NastyNickers » Wed Oct 11, 2017 9:25 am

Guest wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:There's lot of variation between size 6 and not being able to see your feet. Many women will fall under the plus-size umbrella and not be anywhere near the taking up two bus seats category.

As jp said, the people going on about the weight thing are probably trying to goad certain DS members into taking the bait. Why on Earth they care about someone's weight is beyond me. It's just a lazy go-to insult for the intellectually inadequate. Like the hotel owner in the news story from Blackpool posted on DS.


Perfectly said!

There's loads of variations. People carry fat differently, and height/length can distribute it differently. Weight insults fuck me right off, and they can be so fucking damaging.


Yet we had less people complain when posters called JP skinny or Jason Watkins fat. To many it was seen as a joke so not sure why people are getting so bent out of shape this time round.

I agree that the comments designed to goad GD are pathetic but then the skinny runt jabs at JP are too.


And I have commented on skinny insults before, too. As have others. :dunno:
User avatar
NastyNickers
 
Posts: 9501
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2017 1:06 am

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby Vam » Wed Oct 11, 2017 9:36 am

Guest wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:
Vam wrote:
But that's just it - there's nothing secretive going on here :dunno:

The existence of Dogs, and this particular thread, is fairly common knowledge over at DS. You'll quite often see members mention Dogs in their posts there.

Everything posted here is quite easily accessible and freely viewable to all. There's nothing underhand about it.

How else do you imagine DS members have found their way over here? At Dogs they can post more freely, minus the constraints of the bizarre moderation at DS.


You're right, it's not secretive.

I'll take that part back.


I agree with everything you have said Lady M so don’t worry about the backlash from them. The only surprise to me is that you haven’t noticed those posters being cunts and bitching in teams for yonks in here now. I agree it’s cowardly and can seem like a form of ganging up or bullying and most wouldn’t dare to try and act in a similar way on DS as they know they’d get banned.


Oh here we go :roll:

:nelix: Another busybody baghead, bustling in and pretending to be speaking out against injustice and 'bullying'' When the reality is that it's clearly just an excuse to cunt people out and stir up some more crap.

Bullying, ffs? Seriously? :roll: While you so casually scatter that word about, do you ever stop and think what bullying is, in its truest sense? How about the REAL victims of bullying - ever think about how you diminish what they go through?

Btw, if the DS threads offend your sensibilities so damn much, why are you posting in them? Why not just avoid them?
User avatar
Vam
 
Posts: 19294
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 9:57 am

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby Guest » Wed Oct 11, 2017 9:40 am

Tomm98 in advice sounds like sam the football
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

Postby Lady Murasaki » Wed Oct 11, 2017 9:47 am

Vam wrote:
Guest wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:
Vam wrote:
But that's just it - there's nothing secretive going on here :dunno:

The existence of Dogs, and this particular thread, is fairly common knowledge over at DS. You'll quite often see members mention Dogs in their posts there.

Everything posted here is quite easily accessible and freely viewable to all. There's nothing underhand about it.

How else do you imagine DS members have found their way over here? At Dogs they can post more freely, minus the constraints of the bizarre moderation at DS.


You're right, it's not secretive.

I'll take that part back.


I agree with everything you have said Lady M so don’t worry about the backlash from them. The only surprise to me is that you haven’t noticed those posters being cunts and bitching in teams for yonks in here now. I agree it’s cowardly and can seem like a form of ganging up or bullying and most wouldn’t dare to try and act in a similar way on DS as they know they’d get banned.


Oh here we go :roll:

:nelix: Another busybody baghead, bustling in and pretending to be speaking out against injustice and 'bullying'' When the reality is that it's clearly just an excuse to cunt people out and stir up some more crap.

Bullying, ffs? Seriously? :roll: While you so casually scatter that word about, do you ever stop and think what bullying is, in its truest sense? How about the REAL victims of bullying - ever think about how you diminish what they go through?

Btw, if the DS threads offend your sensibilities so damn much, why are you posting in them? Why not just avoid them?


I know you're talking to guest and not me here but I'd say if a bunch of people are making negative remarks about someone who isn't doing the same to them it is a form of bullying.
User avatar
Lady Murasaki
 
Posts: 37246
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:46 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests