Page 97 of 99

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:35 pm
by Guest
I hear on the grapevine the BBC aren't happy that people on the soap forum suggested John Yorke was some big homophobic. I never saw the comments myself but I wonder if DS have been forced to ban those who said it?

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:52 pm
by Guest
Keyser Did you manage to stay in touch with the joy of pat? One of the lovely ones on the soap forum.

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:56 pm
by Guest
Guest wrote:I hear on the grapevine the BBC aren't happy that people on the soap forum suggested John Yorke was some big homophobic. I never saw the comments myself but I wonder if DS have been forced to ban those who said it?


Who has been banned from the soap forum recently?

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:02 pm
by Guest
Feline wrote:Some very crass and uninformed opinions on the Hollywood sexual abuse allegations thread.

:slap: :slap:


Numbertwats victim blaming?

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:04 pm
by Guest
You don't agree with me = you haven't read my post properly.

JP :bawlin: :bawlin: :bawlin:

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:11 pm
by Guest
Feline wrote:Some very crass and uninformed opinions on the Hollywood sexual abuse allegations thread.

:slap: :slap:


With JP well among them. :slap: :slap:

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:12 pm
by Guest
Vam wrote:
Guest wrote:
Why has it taken you so long to slag off guest posting? Why aren't you lobbying to have it stopped?


:roll: I've never done that, so why the hell would I start now?

The majority of Guests are fine, and I've often said the place wouldn't be the same without them.

But I do feel total contempt for the few gutless shits, who are clearly clinging to bitter, centuries-old grudges, and who exploit the Guest facility here to anonymously puke out their lies and venom.


You just didn't like that guests pointed out how you liked to throw your weight around here thats all

You've calmed down a bit since It was pointed out :thumbsup:

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:26 pm
by Guest
Guest wrote:
Feline wrote:Some very crass and uninformed opinions on the Hollywood sexual abuse allegations thread.

:slap: :slap:


Numbertwats victim blaming?


And in jail! :yess:

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:27 pm
by Odessa Steps
Guest wrote:
Hobbit Feet/ Fuck Goblin or whatever persona she’s using today, doesn’t have it in her to calm down. She’ll never change that inner freak and nasty streak she has. Her attack on JRA saying he wanks in a bedsit was a major misfire when you consider her own background. But of an own goal really.


Apart from her recent policy on misinterpreting my motives I've always quite liked Hobbit Feet

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:36 pm
by Guest
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Feline wrote:Some very crass and uninformed opinions on the Hollywood sexual abuse allegations thread.

:slap: :slap:


Numbertwats victim blaming?


And in jail! :yess:


I'd ban his ass just for being him and as offensive has his opinion on that thread is I didn't see anything jail worthy.

What you do Jippy?

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:48 pm
by jp761
Guest wrote:Jp talking about women is ironic. Kinda like when Micky was doing his Swiss Toni act.
What is hilarious is, you have a situation on DS where when certain subjects come up, a few people only want themselves to contribute in that particular thread. It really isn't good for debate. It is funny though.

By the way what I have specifically said that you disagree with?

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:50 pm
by jp761
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Feline wrote:Some very crass and uninformed opinions on the Hollywood sexual abuse allegations thread.

:slap: :slap:


Numbertwats victim blaming?


And in jail! :yess:


I'd ban his ass just for being him and as offensive has his opinion on that thread is I didn't see anything jail worthy.

What you do Jippy?
Haha funny.

Someone is having a good cry right now that's what I did.

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:54 pm
by jp761
Guest wrote:You don't agree with me = you haven't read my post properly.

JP :bawlin: :bawlin: :bawlin:
Oh I don't fall for the tactic of FMs picking out one sentence or a few words from a post and centering on it. Stirring and twisting it's just bullshit. So yeah some people don't read posts properly.

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:54 pm
by guest
Guest wrote:
Feline wrote:Some very crass and uninformed opinions on the Hollywood sexual abuse allegations thread.

:slap: :slap:


Numbertwats victim blaming?


I don't think he's as bad as all that but he really is being a tosser in that thread. The blame does not rest on the groped and assaulted young actresses who feared a powerful mogul who seemed pretty untouchable (despite his reputation and repeated complaints to the police nothing happened) and the abuse, mockery and ruined career that often comes with speaking out. You don't have to look far to find the attitudes of "they knew what they were getting into" "they are lying" and "they just want money" after all. Despite what certain people often say, women are not automatically believed or sympathised with.

Re: DS and DTV Part 66 probably.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:54 pm
by Guest
jp761 wrote:
Guest wrote:
I'd ban his ass just for being him and as offensive has his opinion on that thread is I didn't see anything jail worthy.

What you do Jippy?
Haha funny.

Someone is having a good cry right now that's what I did.


You're the one in jail.