Guest wrote:NastyNickers wrote:I don’t see anyone that thinks every single post has to also mention that men suffer or that women are ‘just as bad’. Some only ever focus on women and get angry if people point out it should be about victims, both female and male. Women don’t have a monopoly on being a victim and many men have used that me too hashtag also.
Terry Crews and Corey Feldman have been high profile Hollywood victims and it’s no surprise many men don’t speak up when you get this kind of reaction if they do. This isn’t a competition you know.
And you’ve completely missed (proven?) my point. There was a little dig in that thread, a “finally a balanced post” in reply to someone who mentioned men suffering too. Because those only addressing women are not balanced
I’m not saying it’s a crime competition, and I’m not saying men should be ignored when it comes to sexual abuse (I’d actually probably swing the other way and say men coming forward is probably a bigger problem. We’ve had a rush of women, but only a handful of men. We need to encourage men to report abuse too). But, men shouldn’t need tacking on to the end of a post to show you are balanced. You can be a perfectly balanced poster without mentioning both sexes in every single post.
I actually think more people need to start mentioning men as victims. This is NOT tagging it along in every post but even if it was, so what? I’ll don’t ever see more people speaking up about sexual assault towards men as a bad thing.
Whenever we have any of these topics it’s almost always women talking about women being victims. Its good for them to do so of course.
Often scorn is pointed on men who say the same and it’s a stigma we need to get rid of. This whole shut up and man up thing. I wish more men would speak up and highlight this is a problem that affects both genders. I don’t think you or anyone should be shutting down people who point out that these threads should be about ALL victims and that men are victims of sexual assault too.
Guest wrote:I could also get Harlowe into trouble with the BBC for copyright issues so its best she stops trying to provoke me. I've played nice with her until now. If she is paranoid its because she is worried her secrets are coming out.
Guest wrote:Queen Soap-Lea is an angel. She wouldn't bully anymore, accept those who she disagrees with.
Guest wrote:Queen Soap-Lea is an angel. She wouldn't bully anymore, accept those who she disagrees with.
Vam wrote::ooer:
Who knew a soap discussion forum could spawn such angst, hatred, bitter rivalry and mortal enemies?
It's like a Soap!
Vam wrote::ooer:
Who knew a soap discussion forum could spawn such angst, hatred, bitter rivalry and mortal enemies?
It's like a Soap!
Vam wrote::ooer:
Who knew a soap discussion forum could spawn such angst, hatred, bitter rivalry and mortal enemies?
It's like a Soap!
Guest wrote:Vam wrote::ooer:
Who knew a soap discussion forum could spawn such angst, hatred, bitter rivalry and mortal enemies?
It's like a Soap!
It's crazy! It seems to be an EastEnders fan again.
This thread seems to have attracted a few Putin types. Trying to cause division, Suspicion, paranoia, splits and feuding amongst soap forum users.
A very glaring attempt to pit people against each other posting innuendo,lies about loads of different members of the soap forum casting a cloud of suspicion over them.
Weird agenda.
Guest wrote:Vam wrote::ooer:
Who knew a soap discussion forum could spawn such angst, hatred, bitter rivalry and mortal enemies?
It's like a Soap!
Well yes, and you are right in the middle of it stirring the pot.
Vam wrote:Guest wrote:Vam wrote::ooer:
Who knew a soap discussion forum could spawn such angst, hatred, bitter rivalry and mortal enemies?
It's like a Soap!
It's crazy! It seems to be an EastEnders fan again.
This thread seems to have attracted a few Putin types. Trying to cause division, Suspicion, paranoia, splits and feuding amongst soap forum users.
A very glaring attempt to pit people against each other posting innuendo,lies about loads of different members of the soap forum casting a cloud of suspicion over them.
Weird agenda.
I never read the DS Soaps section. But who needs it, when there's loads of drama and intrigue to be seen right here at Dogs.
The only thing that has startled me though, is that in that garbled word salad up there ^^^ there's a mention of a forum member topping themself Did that really happen, or have I read it wrong?
Vam wrote:Guest wrote:Vam wrote::ooer:
Who knew a soap discussion forum could spawn such angst, hatred, bitter rivalry and mortal enemies?
It's like a Soap!
Well yes, and you are right in the middle of it stirring the pot.
Oh fuck off.
Guest wrote:Vam wrote:Guest wrote:Vam wrote::ooer:
Who knew a soap discussion forum could spawn such angst, hatred, bitter rivalry and mortal enemies?
It's like a Soap!
Well yes, and you are right in the middle of it stirring the pot.
Oh fuck off.
is that a chopard & taittinger fuck off, or a ratner's & tizer fuck off?
Guest wrote:Vam wrote:Guest wrote:Vam wrote::ooer:
Who knew a soap discussion forum could spawn such angst, hatred, bitter rivalry and mortal enemies?
It's like a Soap!
It's crazy! It seems to be an EastEnders fan again.
This thread seems to have attracted a few Putin types. Trying to cause division, Suspicion, paranoia, splits and feuding amongst soap forum users.
A very glaring attempt to pit people against each other posting innuendo,lies about loads of different members of the soap forum casting a cloud of suspicion over them.
Weird agenda.
I never read the DS Soaps section. But who needs it, when there's loads of drama and intrigue to be seen right here at Dogs.
The only thing that has startled me though, is that in that garbled word salad up there ^^^ there's a mention of a forum member topping themself Did that really happen, or have I read it wrong?
I'm not aware of a DS soap forum user killing themselves but very sad if true. Did they say who it was?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests