DS and DTV Part 69

Big Threads

Re: DS and DTV Part 68

Postby jp761 » Sun Oct 29, 2017 8:19 pm

Dean wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:Did you want to be pushed jp? Why not just stop posting for a while instead?


I think some Guests pull him up on it because he claims he left but he was really banned. I don’t see the big deal personally...
What do they know about it.
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 7966
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 68

Postby Guest » Sun Oct 29, 2017 8:25 pm

jp761 wrote:
Dean wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:Did you want to be pushed jp? Why not just stop posting for a while instead?


I think some Guests pull him up on it because he claims he left but he was really banned. I don’t see the big deal personally...
What do they know about it.



Ignore the wankers JP it’s obvious they are trying to wind you up and that some would love it if you did get banned rather than make the decision yourself in walk-in away like you did. They sound gutted they haven’t had you permanently banned.

I think you should take the JRA approach and start to alert the on DS who target you. You know they do it to you. If they break the rules or get personal with you then Flag it to the mods. They’ll soon learn the DS rules apply to them as well.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 68

Postby Guest » Sun Oct 29, 2017 8:29 pm

A poster called Tanequil has been on ds for 10 years and has notched up nearly 250, 000 posts in that time. Thats a lot of posting :thud:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 68

Postby guest » Sun Oct 29, 2017 8:49 pm

Guest wrote:
jp761 wrote:
Dean wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:Did you want to be pushed jp? Why not just stop posting for a while instead?


I think some Guests pull him up on it because he claims he left but he was really banned. I don’t see the big deal personally...
What do they know about it.



Ignore the wankers JP it’s obvious they are trying to wind you up and that some would love it if you did get banned rather than make the decision yourself in walk-in away like you did. They sound gutted they haven’t had you permanently banned.

I think you should take the JRA approach and [url]start to alert the on DS who target you[/url]. You know they do it to you. If they break the rules or get personal with you then Flag it to the mods. They’ll soon learn the DS rules apply to them as well.


Keep up old bean, the ejit is banned from DS so how can he alert?

:bell: :bell: :bell:
User avatar
guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 68

Postby Guest » Sun Oct 29, 2017 8:54 pm

Guest wrote:A poster called Tanequil has been on ds for 10 years and has notched up nearly 250, 000 posts in that time. Thats a lot of posting :thud:


I think he's a bloke and is quite funny. Sometimes very funny.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 68

Postby jp761 » Sun Oct 29, 2017 8:55 pm

Guest wrote:
jp761 wrote:
Dean wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:Did you want to be pushed jp? Why not just stop posting for a while instead?


I think some Guests pull him up on it because he claims he left but he was really banned. I don’t see the big deal personally...
What do they know about it.



Ignore the wankers JP it’s obvious they are trying to wind you up and that some would love it if you did get banned rather than make the decision yourself in walk-in away like you did. They sound gutted they haven’t had you permanently banned.

I think you should take the JRA approach and start to alert the on DS who target you. You know they do it to you. If they break the rules or get personal with you then Flag it to the mods. They’ll soon learn the DS rules apply to them as well.
Yeah I know all that. But a little difficult mate my account is terminated and I have no intention of going back. People should really stop caring about what happened, and forget about me and DS. I realise it has proven to be a tad difficult for some though. :roll:
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 7966
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 68

Postby jp761 » Sun Oct 29, 2017 8:57 pm

guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
jp761 wrote:
Dean wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:Did you want to be pushed jp? Why not just stop posting for a while instead?


I think some Guests pull him up on it because he claims he left but he was really banned. I don’t see the big deal personally...
What do they know about it.



Ignore the wankers JP it’s obvious they are trying to wind you up and that some would love it if you did get banned rather than make the decision yourself in walk-in away like you did. They sound gutted they haven’t had you permanently banned.

I think you should take the JRA approach and [url]start to alert the on DS who target you[/url]. You know they do it to you. If they break the rules or get personal with you then Flag it to the mods. They’ll soon learn the DS rules apply to them as well.


Keep up old bean, the ejit is banned from DS so how can he alert?

:bell: :bell: :bell:
Twat. That guest probably doesn't pay quite as much interest in me as you do. :roll:
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 7966
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 68

Postby Guest » Sun Oct 29, 2017 9:06 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:Never noticed sorcha_healy27 until she was mentioned here but what an annoying cunt. She seems to have a stick up her arse.


Her/his sole purpose seems to be baiting. A jail stint or a full ban will come soon I reckon



She is quite the wee hypocrite. In GD she's making out she's the great feminist for defending women's right to dress how they want and to be sexually active if they wish - and quite right too - and criticising posters who make derogatory remarks about women; yet in Soaps, Showbiz and Big Brother she's right in with the worst of them when it comes to hate-piling on females who she doesn't like, or who don't act the way she thinks they should. It's as if she is two different people depending on what topic she's posting on.
And she reserves her "feminism" for women with the same politics as her. I'm sure she accused the likes of Angelina Jolie and Meryl Streep as being partly responsible for Weinstein's behaviour because they never reported him at the time, but that was because they're liberals and more interested in themselves and their careers. Then again, she defended Trump against the "pussy-grabbing" accusations, saying the women were only after money or were trying to derail his election campaign.
She's not a very likeable person, and she's thick as fuck.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 68

Postby Guest » Sun Oct 29, 2017 9:15 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:Never noticed sorcha_healy27 until she was mentioned here but what an annoying cunt. She seems to have a stick up her arse.


Her/his sole purpose seems to be baiting. A jail stint or a full ban will come soon I reckon



She is quite the wee hypocrite. In GD she's making out she's the great feminist for defending women's right to dress how they want and to be sexually active if they wish - and quite right too - and criticising posters who make derogatory remarks about women; yet in Soaps, Showbiz and Big Brother she's right in with the worst of them when it comes to hate-piling on females who she doesn't like, or who don't act the way she thinks they should. It's as if she is two different people depending on what topic she's posting on.
And she reserves her "feminism" for women with the same politics as her. I'm sure she accused the likes of Angelina Jolie and Meryl Streep as being partly responsible for Weinstein's behaviour because they never reported him at the time, but that was because they're liberals and more interested in themselves and their careers. Then again, she defended Trump against the "pussy-grabbing" accusations, saying the women were only after money or were trying to derail his election campaign.
She's not a very likeable person, and she's thick as fuck.


This is what surprises me about Sorcha, on one hand she is Trump supporter who defended him against the harassment rumours and seems to show loyalty to the Tories yet on the other is a full on Leftie feminist. Its like two people use the account as the views differ so much.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 68

Postby Guest » Sun Oct 29, 2017 9:29 pm

jp761 wrote:
Guest wrote:
jp761 wrote:
Dean wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:Did you want to be pushed jp? Why not just stop posting for a while instead?


I think some Guests pull him up on it because he claims he left but he was really banned. I don’t see the big deal personally...
What do they know about it.



Ignore the wankers JP it’s obvious they are trying to wind you up and that some would love it if you did get banned rather than make the decision yourself in walk-in away like you did. They sound gutted they haven’t had you permanently banned.

I think you should take the JRA approach and start to alert the on DS who target you. You know they do it to you. If they break the rules or get personal with you then Flag it to the mods. They’ll soon learn the DS rules apply to them as well.
Yeah I know all that. But a little difficult mate my account is terminated and I have no intention of going back. People should really stop caring about what happened, and forget about me and DS. I realise it has proven to be a tad difficult for some though. :roll:


It’s certainly not easy to forget about you when you say you’ve gone to decorate for the foreseeable future and you’re back less than 48 hours later trying to point score whenever Dean isn’t looking. :pmsl:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 69

Postby Guest » Sun Oct 29, 2017 9:32 pm

I think it's disgraceful that jp got banned. There are people like watkins and Kizzie who get away with so much worse.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 69

Postby Guest » Sun Oct 29, 2017 9:50 pm

Jilly the slut is still at it.
wont be long until the slag is banned i bet she has a face like a :Lucia: chewing a :nelix: dumb bitch
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 69

Postby Guest » Sun Oct 29, 2017 10:07 pm

Guest wrote:Jilly the slut is still at it.
wont be long until the slag is banned i bet she has a face like a :Lucia: chewing a :nelix: dumb bitch

You - like certain MPs it seems - have a real problem with women, don't you.
Sad sack.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 69

Postby Guest » Sun Oct 29, 2017 10:18 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:Jilly the slut is still at it.
wont be long until the slag is banned i bet she has a face like a :Lucia: chewing a :nelix: dumb bitch

You - like certain MPs it seems - have a real problem with women, don't you.
Sad sack.

and what are you going to do about it bitch :yess:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 69

Postby Puzzler » Sun Oct 29, 2017 10:25 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:Jilly the slut is still at it.
wont be long until the slag is banned i bet she has a face like a :Lucia: chewing a :nelix: dumb bitch

You - like certain MPs it seems - have a real problem with women, don't you.
Sad sack.

Feminazi cunt :more beer:
User avatar
Puzzler
 
Posts: 7172
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:07 pm
Location: A brave new world

PreviousNext

Return to The Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests