guest wrote:Lambert wrote:Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Guest wrote:If you do know a mod please ask them why Ads, Trevgo, James2001, TheEngineer, Oleo Strut and others are allowed to rule the politics threads unchallenged and why they can pounce on anyone who disagrees with them with no fear.
Trevgo's banning was a genuine mistake.
The other names you have listed haven't broken any forum rules despite the mass alerting from the same several users.
Here's a tip. getting several of your pals to alert a post will not make the mods take more notice of the 'faux' outrage. It only makes them turn a blind eye to the game playing of those misusing the alert feature.
Come off it! all the above names have broken these two rule numerous times
2.9 - Respect
While you are of course welcome to disagree with other members, we will not tolerate posts which insult, belittle, bait or otherwise antagonise forum members. This includes posts which disrespectfully label others posters as 'fanboys', 'haters' or similar.Disruption: Unconstructive, off-topic and pointless posts
Unconstructive posts are posts that contribute nothing to a thread.
Sums up most of the posts by the remainers in the DS politics section. That's not even a sarcastic exaggeration. Ads, i4u, BanglaRoad, Penny Crayon, Sandy Nerja, James2001, dalehitchy, Trevgo, flashfiction (who's morphed into a human Twitter bot). Posting snide bait all over the shop and I never see a post removed or a poster banned or in jail.
Trevgo's reinstatement after his 'accidental' ban smells fishy. More like a friendly mod reversed the decision.
How long has Ash_M1 been in jail quite surprised thought she was one of the special ones.
How Trevgo and Oleo Stut get passed though two rules is beyond me they must be in league with the mods, they break those rules everyday.
Just seen that fucking moron Ash_M1 post this: "The BBC is the only site I trust to provide me with a balanced, unbiased take."
Am I right in thinking that she works for them? And the stupid moose expects us to regard her opinions on the BBC as "a balanced, unbiased take"?
Either way, triggering her by slagging off the BBC and/or dropping that you think the license fee should be abolished into the conversation never gets old