Dogs Sleeping Forum

Not scandalised at all.
Unwise to have said it I suppose, but she's probably right. All the Tory's token black candidates/MPs are just awful. Once upon a time, it was always the working class Tories who were the most rightwing. Now it seems true of the ethnic minority ones.
Cleverly. Patel. Kwarteng. Zahawi.
Dreadful.

Guest wrote:I'm sure BanglaTwat & co. will be rushing in to call out this racist cunt:

Not scandalised at all.
Unwise to have said it I suppose, but she's probably right. All the Tory's token black candidates/MPs are just awful. Once upon a time, it was always the working class Tories who were the most rightwing. Now it seems true of the ethnic minority ones.
Cleverly. Patel. Kwarteng. Zahawi.
Dreadful.

Oh wait, it's trevgo. Move along everyone, nothing to see here.

Guest wrote:The more certain posters whine about guests, the less likely guests are ever going to register.

Guest wrote:I'm sure BanglaTwat & co. will be rushing in to call out this racist cunt:

Not scandalised at all.
Unwise to have said it I suppose, but she's probably right. All the Tory's token black candidates/MPs are just awful. Once upon a time, it was always the working class Tories who were the most rightwing. Now it seems true of the ethnic minority ones.
Cleverly. Patel. Kwarteng. Zahawi.
Dreadful.

Oh wait, it's trevgo. Move along everyone, nothing to see here.

Vicky wrote:

Guest wrote:The more certain posters whine about guests, the less likely guests are ever going to register.

As i've said this countless times..

Guests are been here since the forum started and if members didn't like the idea of guest posting, they shouldn't have joined.

Maybe instead of moaning at guests in this thread, they could have a word with Stooo about it.

Somehow, i don't see that happening though.

Guest wrote:The more certain posters whine about guests, the less likely guests are ever going to register.

Lady Murasaki wrote:

Guest wrote:The more certain posters whine about guests, the less likely guests are ever going to register.

It's a circular argument isn't it, guests moan about members, so members moan about guests.

Junglejayne wrote:

Lady Murasaki wrote:

Guest wrote:The more certain posters whine about guests, the less likely guests are ever going to register.

It's a circular argument isn't it, guests moan about members, so members moan about guests.

Guests don't moan about members status though, member moaning about guests as though they've no right to be here need to get over it. Appreciate the quality guest input and ignore the obvious baiting instead of repetitive f off baghead posts

Guest wrote:

Guest wrote:

Guest wrote:Hilda won't be getting an apology from me. One thing is apparent in all this. He, Sorcha, Soap-Lea and Harlowe have been leaving comments on here accusing various members of all sorts because of some odd fixation they have on a user whom from what I can tell was banned 4 years ago. I did think it was weird how the soap forums kings and queens suddenly kept being mentioned a few weeks back, now we know why. It was Hilda trying to bait this 'Peach' person into responding on DS. As for Peach himself, as DS have yet to ban him we can assume he hasn't broken any rules. Time to move on darlings. Get a life and stop stalking all new members with your pathetic and outdated vendettas. Who gives a shit if a PBU is back online? if this is your life you fuckers really need to get off benefits and start living a life. Being obsessed is not a good look.

P.s my advice to Peach, don't take the bait.

It does come across as bullying when you put it like this. I can't see what Peach has done wrong. His threads are no different to what others start and if he has posted digs about this forum doesn't he have the right to after what Harlowe accused him of? and Hilda is in no position to call out PBU's when he is one himself. so if the cap fucking fits..

I'm pleased the mods haven't given them the satisfaction of banning him.

Because of how they have behaved its Peach who is coming across as the victim. Bet that wasn't the intention.

Guest wrote:
Evidence?
Peach has been baited here and on DS. Seen the comments myself. I have yet to discover a ban offence?
He is owed apoligies but some of you are to pathetic to give it.

Lady Murasaki wrote:

Junglejayne wrote:

Lady Murasaki wrote:

Guest wrote:The more certain posters whine about guests, the less likely guests are ever going to register.

It's a circular argument isn't it, guests moan about members, so members moan about guests.

Guests don't moan about members status though, member moaning about guests as though they've no right to be here need to get over it. Appreciate the quality guest input and ignore the obvious baiting instead of repetitive f off baghead posts

There has to be some perks to being a member hasn't there? I do agree though, some guest posts are good quality and ignoring the baiting isn't difficult.

Lady Murasaki wrote:

Junglejayne wrote:

Lady Murasaki wrote:

Guest wrote:The more certain posters whine about guests, the less likely guests are ever going to register.

It's a circular argument isn't it, guests moan about members, so members moan about guests.

Guests don't moan about members status though, member moaning about guests as though they've no right to be here need to get over it. Appreciate the quality guest input and ignore the obvious baiting instead of repetitive f off baghead posts

There has to be some perks to being a member hasn't there? I do agree though, some guest posts are good quality and ignoring the baiting isn't difficult.

Guest wrote:

Guest wrote:

Guest wrote:

Guest wrote:Hilda won't be getting an apology from me. One thing is apparent in all this. He, Sorcha, Soap-Lea and Harlowe have been leaving comments on here accusing various members of all sorts because of some odd fixation they have on a user whom from what I can tell was banned 4 years ago. I did think it was weird how the soap forums kings and queens suddenly kept being mentioned a few weeks back, now we know why. It was Hilda trying to bait this 'Peach' person into responding on DS. As for Peach himself, as DS have yet to ban him we can assume he hasn't broken any rules. Time to move on darlings. Get a life and stop stalking all new members with your pathetic and outdated vendettas. Who gives a shit if a PBU is back online? if this is your life you fuckers really need to get off benefits and start living a life. Being obsessed is not a good look.

P.s my advice to Peach, don't take the bait.

It does come across as bullying when you put it like this. I can't see what Peach has done wrong. His threads are no different to what others start and if he has posted digs about this forum doesn't he have the right to after what Harlowe accused him of? and Hilda is in no position to call out PBU's when he is one himself. so if the cap fucking fits..

I'm pleased the mods haven't given them the satisfaction of banning him.

Because of how they have behaved its Peach who is coming across as the victim. Bet that wasn't the intention.

Evidence?
Peach has been baited here and on DS. Seen the comments myself. I have yet to discover a ban offence?
He is owed apoligies but some of you are to pathetic to give it.