@mash
Ditto.
NastyNickers wrote:Goodwife wrote:
Because he did say that originally along with the giddy comment then he clarified to you that he may mean that.
Sorry I got wrong end of the stick I think.
Sure he said that you changed towards him after someone said you were pandering and you were becoming like others in attacking him (my laymans words not his) to show you weren't pandering.
Then I think you had a joke or something with Dean to spite him and show everyone you weren't pandering to
JP
Then he said to you that yes you could fall into the category of the giddies flirting with poor old Dean. I say poor old Dean cos he is supposedly a bit hapless that all these women are flirting with him.
Now I think that may be it, I might still be wrong but its all been confusing
The joke was the attack, I think.
And that that joke could also maybe mean that possibly someone might just think I could be guilty of giddy stuff.
Which is why I was asking for clarification. Because I’m as confused as you are.
I told why 'giddy' may also apply to you.NastyNickers wrote:Goodwife wrote:
Because he did say that originally along with the giddy comment then he clarified to you that he may mean that.
Sorry I got wrong end of the stick I think.
Sure he said that you changed towards him after someone said you were pandering and you were becoming like others in attacking him (my laymans words not his) to show you weren't pandering.
Then I think you had a joke or something with Dean to spite him and show everyone you weren't pandering to
JP
Then he said to you that yes you could fall into the category of the giddies flirting with poor old Dean. I say poor old Dean cos he is supposedly a bit hapless that all these women are flirting with him.
Now I think that may be it, I might still be wrong but its all been confusing
The joke was the attack, I think.
And that that joke could also maybe mean that possibly someone might just think I could be guilty of giddy stuff.
Which is why I was asking for clarification. Because I’m as confused as you are.
Holly wrote:Why can't you guys just stop this boring jp crap and get back to the actual topic which is called " DS and DTV "..?
Seriously jp, you're enjoying this attention far too much, at the expense of anyone who would actually like to chat about the real topic...JUST STOP
jp761 wrote:I told why 'giddy' may also apply to you.NastyNickers wrote:Goodwife wrote:
Because he did say that originally along with the giddy comment then he clarified to you that he may mean that.
Sorry I got wrong end of the stick I think.
Sure he said that you changed towards him after someone said you were pandering and you were becoming like others in attacking him (my laymans words not his) to show you weren't pandering.
Then I think you had a joke or something with Dean to spite him and show everyone you weren't pandering to
JP
Then he said to you that yes you could fall into the category of the giddies flirting with poor old Dean. I say poor old Dean cos he is supposedly a bit hapless that all these women are flirting with him.
Now I think that may be it, I might still be wrong but its all been confusing
The joke was the attack, I think.
And that that joke could also maybe mean that possibly someone might just think I could be guilty of giddy stuff.
Which is why I was asking for clarification. Because I’m as confused as you are.
Once more then.. You dig at me in that thread while 'joking' with dean. You made him look like Mr innocent, hence why getting all 'giddy', may also apply to you. I don't think it's a coincidence, happening very soon after a guest/s accused you of pandering to me.
jp761 wrote:I'd already said what GW did. Like pages ago.
guest wrote:Must admit I'm finding DS pretty bland lately. Anyone else?
The thread was locked, I would have brought it up there otherwise. I have a right to question it.Dean wrote:jp761 wrote:I told why 'giddy' may also apply to you.NastyNickers wrote:Goodwife wrote:
Because he did say that originally along with the giddy comment then he clarified to you that he may mean that.
Sorry I got wrong end of the stick I think.
Sure he said that you changed towards him after someone said you were pandering and you were becoming like others in attacking him (my laymans words not his) to show you weren't pandering.
Then I think you had a joke or something with Dean to spite him and show everyone you weren't pandering to
JP
Then he said to you that yes you could fall into the category of the giddies flirting with poor old Dean. I say poor old Dean cos he is supposedly a bit hapless that all these women are flirting with him.
Now I think that may be it, I might still be wrong but its all been confusing
The joke was the attack, I think.
And that that joke could also maybe mean that possibly someone might just think I could be guilty of giddy stuff.
Which is why I was asking for clarification. Because I’m as confused as you are.
Once more then.. You dig at me in that thread while 'joking' with dean. You made him look like Mr innocent, hence why getting all 'giddy', may also apply to you. I don't think it's a coincidence, happening very soon after a guest/s accused you of pandering to me.
One ‘negative’ post towards you and have an 8 hour meltdown? Man, you have serious self esteem issues...
NastyNickers wrote:jp761 wrote:I'd already said what GW did. Like pages ago.
No you hadn’t. You’re spineless. You have a paddy over some perceived slight, spit your dummy out and chuck out some insults.
Then you’ve not got the bollocks to actually explain what you think. You shit bricks and post nonsense until somebody else swoops in to save you.
Holly is right. You love this attention. You’ve been destroying threads on here for weeks. I’d tell you to give it a rest before you look a fool, but that ship sailed yonks ago.
I've explained it a number of times. You just chose to ignore it. I've just recently explained it yet again!NastyNickers wrote:jp761 wrote:I'd already said what GW did. Like pages ago.
No you hadn’t. You’re spineless. You have a paddy over some perceived slight, spit your dummy out and chuck out some insults.
Then you’ve not got the bollocks to actually explain what you think. You shit bricks and post nonsense until somebody else swoops in to save you.
Holly is right. You love this attention. You’ve been destroying threads on here for weeks. I’d tell you to give it a rest before you look a fool, but that ship sailed yonks ago.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests