by Guest » Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:47 pm
Goodwife wrote:Guest wrote:NastyNickers wrote:jp761 wrote:NastyNickers wrote:Show me these ‘recent posts in your direction’.
Being civil would have been asking if I meant any offence with that joke. I would have explained it.
Civil is not spitting your dummy out and accusing me of fancying a poster because I’ve said something you don’t like.
I suppose that sums up your character though. The only possible reason I could disagree with you is because I’m blinded by my lust.
Look I've told you how it looked to me, a dig at me, and a joke with someone who I get on with the least around here. Your attempt to put a stop to the 'pandering JP', accusations.
Fancying.. bit far for online, isn't it. No one mentioned anything of the sort. Lust? WTF. This is online.
So, are you denying the post where you said I was joining the HF and JJ brigade? Because your insinuation there is obvious, it’s JJ and HF who get accused of wanting a bit of Dean. The ‘change’ in me? The post about going gaga over Dean. And then this little gem:
“A few guests have mentioned the women going giddy stuff.. over the last week or so.
Maybe it's just plain to see”
I think you’re getting thinks mixed up Nic. I took it to mean JJ and Hobbit are generally the 2 who target him on here and he thought you might be joining them in doing it also.
Them two going gooey eyed or trying to act more girly whenever Dean appears I think is totally separate. I could be wrong but that’s how I read it.
Thats what I thought too
It's a Venn Diagram -Dean in one circle, numbertwat in the other, JJ and HF in the intersection.