DS and DTV Part 72

Big Threads

Re: DS and DTV Part 72

Postby Mash » Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:21 pm

jp761 wrote:
Mash wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:
jp761 wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:
Me? Defensive?

Out of the blue you’ve brought up a post from a different thread, a post that most people would see for the joke it was.
You’ve turned it into some big thing about me attacking you for days.
You’ve accused me of changing because I fancy another poster. Because it’s plain to see me going giddy.
And when I reply you accuse me of being defensive.

Show me these posts where I’ve changed and where I’ve been on your back. Either show me or fuck off trying to blame me for your own issues. You’ve crossed a line JP and you’ll get none of the courtesy I’ve previously showed you.
You. That was you not pandering to me in two ways, having a dig and having a joke with the fella who I really don't get on with. Like I say, since the guest said that bollocks, you appear to have took it to heart.

Show me the posts that demonstrate my change.

Otherwise, please shut the fuck up. I can and will post to whoever I like. Up until this point I’ve made a point to always approach disagreements with you in a way to avoid you overreacting. I’ve been calm and civilised and bent my normal style in ways I don’t always do for others. It’s a shame you could not extend that same courtesy to me, JP. :shake head:

I’m not angry, I’m just disappointed.

:bum:

This is why I'm going back to ignoring him. I was polite and asked him a couple of questions and he got all arsey with me for no reason.
:pmsl: You asking legimate questions. Don't make me laugh. :roll:
And there you go again.

Waste of time trying to converse with you.
User avatar
Mash
 
Posts: 620
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 6:56 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 72

Postby Holly » Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:22 pm

This thread has gone down the shitter :brickwall: ...seriously people, get a grip :roll:
User avatar
Holly
Site Admin
 
Posts: 15837
Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 3:25 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 72

Postby Mash » Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:26 pm

NastyNickers wrote:
jp761 wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:
jp761 wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:
That isn’t an answer. At least have the decency to explain what your insults mean.

What is giddy stuff?
It is. It's also self-explanatory.


No it isn’t.

If you’re going to accuse me of something, have the fucking bollocks to tell me what it is.
I told you HOW giddy MAY WELL apply to you. Find that post.


Stop being a fucking pussy and avoiding the question.

Explain what you mean by giddy stuff.

I think he just chucks a bunch of words out regardless of whether they make sense and then complains when people ask him to explain. It's ridiculous and childish
User avatar
Mash
 
Posts: 620
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 6:56 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 72

Postby Goodwife » Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:32 pm

NastyNickers wrote:
Goodwife wrote:
jp761 wrote:
Goodwife wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:
I’m not asking why it applies to me.

I want to know what it means.

Why is this so difficult?



There have been comments over the past few days that some female members have been flirting and being a bit giddy over Dean.
You known your onions.


Well its not like it hasn't been constantly memtioned :dunno:



Hang on. When I said that, you agreed with a guest that that wasn’t what he meant. :dunno:


Because he did say that originally along with the giddy comment then he clarified to you that he may mean that.

Sorry I got wrong end of the stick I think.

Sure he said that you changed towards him after someone said you were pandering and you were becoming like others in attacking him (my laymans words not his) to show you weren't pandering.

Then I think you had a joke or something with Dean to spite him and show everyone you weren't pandering to
JP

Then he said to you that yes you could fall into the category of the giddies flirting with poor old Dean. I say poor old Dean cos he is supposedly a bit hapless that all these women are flirting with him.

Now I think that may be it, I might still be wrong but its all been confusing :dunno:
Last edited by Goodwife on Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Goodwife
 
Posts: 9047
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2017 2:53 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 72

Postby Guest » Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:35 pm

Mash wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:
jp761 wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:
That isn’t an answer. At least have the decency to explain what your insults mean.

What is giddy stuff?


No it isn’t.

If you’re going to accuse me of something, have the fucking bollocks to tell me what it is.
I told you HOW giddy MAY WELL apply to you. Find that post.


Stop being a fucking pussy and avoiding the question.

Explain what you mean by giddy stuff.

I think he just chucks a bunch of words out regardless of whether they make sense and then complains when people ask him to explain. It's ridiculous and childish


Have to say he was pretty much the same on the other forum. Seems he was more interested in post count than the quality of said posts. Might explain the behaviour here, spew out any old guff just to get it out there, nonsensical or otherwise.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 72

Postby jp761 » Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:37 pm

user wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:
jp761 wrote:That's enough of flooding the thread with same/similar replies. Going around is circles and repeating stuff has to come to end at some point. :thumbsup:

Nothing else to add, for now.


It’s only me repeating myself, as it seems you’ve not got the balls to tell me what you mean by your insult.

Don’t forget to tuck your tail in on your way out.

Thing is he sees posters using new words like "giddy" and re-uses them with no real knowledge of the meaning.
New words, you're a right joker. The word is rather old. ;)

It seems other people don't know what the word means.
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 7966
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 72

Postby jp761 » Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:39 pm

user wrote:
jp761 wrote:
Goodwife wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:
jp761 wrote:@NN

Find the post, it gives my reasons, of why it may apply to you.


I’m not asking why it applies to me.

I want to know what it means.

Why is this so difficult?



There have been comments over the past few days that some female members have been flirting and being a bit giddy over Dean.
You known your onions.

You known your onions?????
Obviously it's, know. :roll: Forgive the typo. Happens to the best of us.
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 7966
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 72

Postby jp761 » Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:40 pm

Goodwife wrote:
jp761 wrote:
Goodwife wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:
jp761 wrote:@NN

Find the post, it gives my reasons, of why it may apply to you.


I’m not asking why it applies to me.

I want to know what it means.

Why is this so difficult?



There have been comments over the past few days that some female members have been flirting and being a bit giddy over Dean.
You known your onions.


Well its not like it hasn't been constantly memtioned :dunno:
:thumbsup:
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 7966
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 72

Postby Holly » Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:40 pm

Why can't you guys just stop this boring jp crap and get back to the actual topic which is called " DS and DTV "..?

Seriously jp, you're enjoying this attention far too much, at the expense of anyone who would actually like to chat about the real topic...JUST STOP :grrrrr:
User avatar
Holly
Site Admin
 
Posts: 15837
Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 3:25 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 72

Postby Dean » Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:41 pm

Holly wrote:This thread has gone down the shitter :brickwall: ...seriously people, get a grip :roll:


You tell em, Holly...
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 47578
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:02 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 72

Postby jp761 » Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:42 pm

guest wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:
jp761 wrote:That's enough of flooding the thread with same/similar replies. Going around is circles and repeating stuff has to come to end at some point. :thumbsup:

Nothing else to add, for now.


It’s only me repeating myself, as it seems you’ve not got the balls to tell me what you mean by your insult.

Don’t forget to tuck your tail in on your way out.

Bit difficult as he's Enid Blyton's answer to Arnie. Muscular dontcha know.
Absolutely. :snooty:
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 7966
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 72

Postby Holly » Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:42 pm

Dean wrote:
Holly wrote:This thread has gone down the shitter :brickwall: ...seriously people, get a grip :roll:


You tell em, Holly...



I did :woteva:
User avatar
Holly
Site Admin
 
Posts: 15837
Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 3:25 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 72

Postby jp761 » Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:44 pm

@backup guest

:bawlin: :bawlin: You and dean.
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 7966
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 72

Postby jp761 » Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:46 pm

NastyNickers wrote:
jp761 wrote:
Goodwife wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:
jp761 wrote:@NN

Find the post, it gives my reasons, of why it may apply to you.


I’m not asking why it applies to me.

I want to know what it means.

Why is this so difficult?



There have been comments over the past few days that some female members have been flirting and being a bit giddy over Dean.
You known your onions.



Finally eh. All it took was Goodwifes bollocks. :roll:

So you’re saying that I’ve been flirting and getting giddy over Dean. I get it.
I'd already said what GW did. Like pages ago.
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 7966
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 72

Postby NastyNickers » Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:47 pm

Goodwife wrote:
Because he did say that originally along with the giddy comment then he clarified to you that he may mean that.

Sorry I got wrong end of the stick I think.

Sure he said that you changed towards him after someone said you were pandering and you were becoming like others in attacking him (my laymans words not his) to show you weren't pandering.

Then I think you had a joke or something with Dean to spite him and show everyone you weren't pandering to
JP

Then he said to you that yes you could fall into the category of the giddies flirting with poor old Dean. I say poor old Dean cos he is supposedly a bit hapless that all these women are flirting with him.

Now I think that may be it, I might still be wrong but its all been confusing :dunno:

The joke was the attack, I think.
And that that joke could also maybe mean that possibly someone might just think I could be guilty of giddy stuff.

Which is why I was asking for clarification. Because I’m as confused as you are.
User avatar
NastyNickers
 
Posts: 9501
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2017 1:06 am

PreviousNext

Return to The Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests