guest wrote:Guest wrote:Poor JRA. He must be pretty upset right now.
Banned, unpopular, boring, proven liar but it's not RL.
Contrary to his protestations to the otherwise, I'd say it is very much 'RL' to him......
guest wrote:Guest wrote:Poor JRA. He must be pretty upset right now.
Banned, unpopular, boring, proven liar but it's not RL.
VR6storm wrote:guest wrote:Guest wrote:Poor JRA. He must be pretty upset right now.
Banned, unpopular, boring, proven liar but it's not RL.
Contrary to his protestations to the otherwise, I'd say it is very much 'RL' to him......
Confused guest wrote:Doghouse rileys page says he was last active 15/12/17
https://forums.digitalspy.com/profile/d ... se%20Riley
Nucks wrote:Confused guest wrote:Doghouse rileys page says he was last active 15/12/17
https://forums.digitalspy.com/profile/d ... se%20Riley
Just a glitch or ‘last active’ doesn’t mean what we think it means. If you click on comments he was posting yesterday.
Poca wrote:Why are some posters constantly singled out and ridiculed by the same ‘mob’ mentality.....why the need for a forum ‘punch bag’?
jra wrote:VR6storm wrote:guest wrote:Guest wrote:Poor JRA. He must be pretty upset right now.
Banned, unpopular, boring, proven liar but it's not RL.
Contrary to his protestations to the otherwise, I'd say it is very much 'RL' to him......
Your obsession and baiting of me is a bit unhealthy, so maybe you should take your own advice.
Nucks wrote:Confused guest wrote:Doghouse rileys page says he was last active 15/12/17
https://forums.digitalspy.com/profile/d ... se%20Riley
Just a glitch or ‘last active’ doesn’t mean what we think it means. If you click on comments he was posting yesterday.
Nucks wrote:Confused guest wrote:Doghouse rileys page says he was last active 15/12/17
https://forums.digitalspy.com/profile/d ... se%20Riley
Just a glitch or ‘last active’ doesn’t mean what we think it means. If you click on comments he was posting yesterday.
Guest wrote:Poca wrote:Why are some posters constantly singled out and ridiculed by the same ‘mob’ mentality.....why the need for a forum ‘punch bag’?
You have to wonder about people like that. Never happy unless theyve got a punch bag. They keep going until the poster responds and either flounces or gets banned. Not a fan of jp or jra and I dislike keyser but the way theyve all been targeted isnt on. Keysers been driven away jps flounced and since been banned now its jras turn to take the full force of the cunts venom. Glad people like you and holly can see it for exactly what it is
VR6storm wrote:jra wrote:VR6storm wrote:guest wrote:Guest wrote:Poor JRA. He must be pretty upset right now.
Banned, unpopular, boring, proven liar but it's not RL.
Contrary to his protestations to the otherwise, I'd say it is very much 'RL' to him......
Your obsession and baiting of me is a bit unhealthy, so maybe you should take your own advice.
That's rich coming from you. And i am not OBSESSED with you. In fact, i've not posted ANYTHING about you for pages
and pages in this thread. Others here appear to be doing just as good a job as I could, so i've just let them get on with it.
jra wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:Are the DS mods that pathetic that they can't tell when forummers are sucking up to them to win favour?
You’ve got to be joking? The DS mods are as thick as pig shit and wildly inconsistent. They ban people purely based on who’s been alerted so the bait and alert mob on there just get trigger happy. Some really good posters have gone in the past and yet serial cunts remain and even those who blatantly break the rules stay.
Serial cunts indeed, they know who they are one of them even posts on here.Guest wrote:
The DS mods are as thick as mince so yes. They really are that pathetic.
Thicker actually.
Are the grapes sour?
Getting banned from a forum isn't that big a deal.
Indeed, but some people on here will make it a big deal.
Lady Murasaki wrote:Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:Are the DS mods that pathetic that they can't tell when forummers are sucking up to them to win favour?
You’ve got to be joking? The DS mods are as thick as pig shit and wildly inconsistent. They ban people purely based on who’s been alerted so the bait and alert mob on there just get trigger happy. Some really good posters have gone in the past and yet serial cunts remain and even those who blatantly break the rules stay.
Serial cunts indeed, they know who they are one of them even posts on here.Guest wrote:
The DS mods are as thick as mince so yes. They really are that pathetic.
Thicker actually.
Are the grapes sour?
Getting banned from a forum isn't that big a deal.
Guest wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:Guest wrote:Guest wrote:
You’ve got to be joking? The DS mods are as thick as pig shit and wildly inconsistent. They ban people purely based on who’s been alerted so the bait and alert mob on there just get trigger happy. Some really good posters have gone in the past and yet serial cunts remain and even those who blatantly break the rules stay.
Serial cunts indeed, they know who they are one of them even posts on here.Guest wrote:
The DS mods are as thick as mince so yes. They really are that pathetic.
Thicker actually.
Are the grapes sour?
Getting banned from a forum isn't that big a deal.
No sour grapes here mate.
I know it's not a big deal but that's why I don't understand why certain FM spend a lot of their time trying to get people banned and then celebrate when they are. They seem to think it's a big deal.
I think you should aim your comments at them, don't you?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests