Dogs Sleeping Forum

Lady Murasaki wrote:So I'm not the only person to find your comments creepy JP?

Do you see a pattern emerging?

Aim= for you to be less of a creep.

Oh fuck off with your pretendy outrage and your preaching
Not a word of criticism for Dean and that other cunt GW for spinning the myth that JP is a kiddy botherer and rampant sex pest?
Your one of the biggest fakes here.

Aim = put up or STFU

This shit better not carry on tomorrow, I'm sick of it

jp761 wrote:

Lady Murasaki wrote:

NastyNickers wrote:

Lady Murasaki wrote:

jp761 wrote:Creepy with you LM. That shit the other day, you realise some people think you made a mountain out of a molehill. They said at the time.

I don't care what people think. If something feels creepy it feels creepy.

You saying what you said felt creepy to me.

Fuck everyone else's opinion on the matter.

Just to be a cunt, I saw that exchange and again I’d say the aggression was the thing that got me. You fucking prick

It was all out of context of the thread for me.
Bringing in an arse then getting aggressive about it.
I got the tip of the iceberg compared to what he's done via pm on DS to various females.

Toxic cunt. Haha. You're the creep.

Well there you go again.
Getting aggressive when you don't like hearing how much you creep women out.
You creep women out JP.
Getting aggressive won't change that FACT.

Holly wrote:This shit better not carry on tomorrow, I'm sick of it

I’d start banning people if it was me...

Fletch wrote:

Guest wrote:

Fletch wrote:

Guest wrote:
But he's admitted to rowing with people in PM.

We're talking about him being called a sex pest, a potential rapist, into kids etc

Which is completely out of order whatever people think of jp as a poster.

Where did in to kids come in to it?

A 'funny' dig Dean made earlier today.

I don't understand how anyone with a shred of decency thinks this kind of trolling from Dean is acceptable.

Haven't read all the thread, idiot kept appearing as a reply so gave up.

Page number?

Page 89

Holly wrote:This shit better not carry on tomorrow, I'm sick of it

Sack the guests. The members are perfectly civilised, you can trust us.

Vam wrote:

Nucks wrote:

Guest wrote:

Nucks wrote:

Guest wrote:Victoria Sponge is 48! Good lord, she looks about 34.

Recent photo?

Saw a recent pic she posted two or three years ago, and she looked early 30s.

We like Victoria Sponge. She's a lovely lady.

Is she Asian by any chance? They often luck out genetically when it comes to aging well. Good on her in any case.

I could be wrong, but I think she might be of Sri Lankan origin?

in the photo I've seen of her she's quite a tall, statuesque woman. Clearly loves her shoes and mini skirts. And why the hell not!

Yep. Sri Lanken.

Lady Murasaki wrote:

jp761 wrote:

Lady Murasaki wrote:So I'm not the only person to find your comments creepy JP?

Do you see a pattern emerging?

Aim= for you to be less of a creep.

It's easy for those who dislike you to just say anything. Doesn't always make it true. All you have to do with some people is have a bicker about a general subject in a thread once or twice, and they turn. It's quite a common thing on the forums. Some people end up very bitter and twisted towards you.

Anyway, I'm off to sleep. Some of you people can think I'm the most disgusting nasty piece of work on here if you want. Up to you.

Or take it on the chin and learn something from it?
If lots of people are saying the same thing they may have a point???

Goodnight.

Take WHAT on the chin? That he's being told he's a kid fiddler? How about living with the sex pest accusations. Should be take that on the chin as well? Would you? Nooooo cos I've seen you go apeshit over nothing at all.

Get your fucking head out of your pretentious arse, Lady.

Goodwife wrote:I googled Paul newman in shorts

I would have no idea if it was someone else

This dude appears better looking and in better shape and there is no tracksuit, gold chains or cigars in site

Keyser was joking. PN is presumably wearing a racing team shirt.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Newman#Auto_racing

Ok LM.

Of course I'm going to get aggressive towards some of the bullshit I read. And it is bullshit. Other women I've conversed with think different, the one's who don't go on forums to blatantly cause shit. They tend to not get involved though, not in their nature.

Fuck sleep. Reading all this shit on here doesn't help induce sleep. I can handle 5 hrs.

And yeah fuck this shit.

NastyNickers wrote:

Goodwife wrote:

NastyNickers wrote:

Lady Murasaki wrote:
The evidence would be on DS not here.
NN knows more about this but various women complained about his pms.
DS banned him for it.

I don’t recall any sexual harrasment regarding JP, or really any of the infamous ‘PMers’.

I’m pretty certain the issue with JP was him taking arguments from threads to PM. It certainly was like that with posters who spoke up at the time.

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_85117108

And there’s the evidence that it was aggression and not sex pesting.

Did you see the thread in chatter after this one? I think it was planets thread and her annie atom and a few others posted in it about JP and it was then edited away.

jP had definitely been getting friendly with one of them was rejected and he got abusive in pm

I saw it. It was discussed on here too.

viewtopic.php?f=23&t=42890&hilit=Planets&start=660

Yes there were mentions of creepy comments, but the main issue was the aggression and the following him around from thread to thread. He was getting shit for being aggressive, not for sexual harrasment.

Reading these threads I'd say that jp constantly talking about real men, hot-blooded males, 7-inch cocks, state of men's arses and stuff like that can make the aggression look like it has a sexual element to it, but I don't thinks it's deliberate sexual harasssment, jp lets his temper get the better of him and he just posts the first bit of shite which comes to mind, then he ups the ante when he gets a response he doesn't like - he just doesn't know when to stop.Or that what's appropriate in one place may not be elsewhere.
Dean calling jp a rapist, paedo etc., that's just Dean being the cunt that he's spent years on the Internet being.For all that jp can be an utter pain in the arse, and this is dogs where pretty much anything goes, that's totally on a new level of cuntyness. Not one of his better moments.

Dean wrote:

Holly wrote:This shit better not carry on tomorrow, I'm sick of it

I’d start banning people if it was me...

...and who would you suggest I ban?

Holly wrote:

Dean wrote:

Holly wrote:This shit better not carry on tomorrow, I'm sick of it

I’d start banning people if it was me...

...and who would you suggest I ban?

MEEEEEEE!!!!!!!

Guest wrote:

Lady Murasaki wrote:So I'm not the only person to find your comments creepy JP?

Do you see a pattern emerging?

Aim= for you to be less of a creep.

Oh fuck off with your pretendy outrage and your preaching
Not a word of criticism for Dean and that other cunt GW for spinning the myth that JP is a kiddy botherer and rampant sex pest?
Your one of the biggest fakes here.

Aim = put up or STFU

Some people get away with shit scot-free. It's all bullshit maybe everyone should be as vulgar as Dean is 24/7.

Guest wrote:

Fletch wrote:

Guest wrote:

Fletch wrote:

Guest wrote:
But he's admitted to rowing with people in PM.

We're talking about him being called a sex pest, a potential rapist, into kids etc

Which is completely out of order whatever people think of jp as a poster.

Where did in to kids come in to it?

A 'funny' dig Dean made earlier today.

I don't understand how anyone with a shred of decency thinks this kind of trolling from Dean is acceptable.

Haven't read all the thread, idiot kept appearing as a reply so gave up.

Page number?

Page 89

Thanks Guest.

Were you not outraged by JP's reply? Seemed worse to me. (same page)