Guest wrote:HobbitFeet wrote:Guest wrote:HobbitFeet wrote:oh
my
word
I know right. Don’t you just hate it when you claim you got on with someone really well on a forum and they publically deny having even spoken to you.
Biggest burn I’ve seen on here in a while.
I'm glad that people finally see what has been said all along
I've known Dean for a long time, but as I said (again) last week there is no intimacy, no flirting, nothing, I'm sure we posted in the same threads on occasion but none spring to mind
but it's nice to know the giddy shite has been seen for what it is, ummmm shite
It's a bit like if I started posting on a forum in the future and Stooo was there, it's like oh yeah I know you, nothing there to suggest anything else, except in the minds of a few that appear to have little else going on in their lives
but yeah it's ok seeing the obsessed guests get burned
If you’ve conversed with Stooo and happened to get on well with him you can say ‘we used to get on so well’. No one would pick you up on that.
What looks like made up fantasy is when you claim you and Dean got on really well yet it’s now been revealed that he never once spoke to you. Sorry but that does make you look a bit weird and comes across as desperate. Now you are just digging a bigger hole.
I think you'll find I've always said that I know Dean from ages ago and that I've never had any issues with him, he amuses me
everything else has come from shit-stirrers trying to make it into something it isn't - even there you've changed 'I know you' into 'got on really well' - fucking transparent
so guest says hobbit and dean have been blah blah blah blah, other guest (and/or members) says no it's not true, and somehow I'm supposed to defend either position
so yeah, some bollocks got refuted, but because a guest refuted it, it must be true, when I've been saying for ages that there is nothing between me and dean at all
I interact with him on here sometimes and will continue to do so