Dogs Sleeping Forum

Gigabit wrote:I apologised on DS if I upset anyone. I did not apologise “constantly” and I certainly won’t be apologising for having a different point of view. I won’t apologise for trolling or baiting on DS as I never did, not once. Unlike Wizzy and co who did constantly. What you call trolling I call criticising. For example posting bollocks and then me questioning it is not trolling. It is how arguments work. But that’s the problem with you Trifles, you don’t want a debate. You enjoy actually trolling and detailing threads.

Holly wrote:

McAz wrote:

Holly wrote:McAz, why do you even involve yourself in this 'womanly" conversation? Go play with your little gherkin, your alter ego

Canny is my friend.

Awwww, that's nice

McAz wrote:

HobbitFeet wrote:

McAz wrote:
So do, for example, the rampant homophobic slurs etc on here - but who gives a fuck?

I'm not really following this whole conversation

why shouldn't people point out if they find something hurtful?
what new rules are there?

pointing out that something bothers you or pisses you off does not equate to wanting to stop it being said or for the post to be removed , it's just your right to voice an opinion on a post

So it wasn't an Admin instruction to stop talking about "womanliness", it was simply a comment by an Admin. Clearly, I misunderstood - but how are we supposed to know the difference?

HobbitFeet wrote:

jra wrote:

Guest wrote:

jra wrote:

Guest wrote:In your boring life maybe.

Was that called for? No. So fuck off. You know sod all about my life.

You seem to spend much of your time in the pub, paying for female company and torturing animal.

Nice.

Torturing animals now. How low are you willing to stoop?

ETA. Another serious accusation which has been screen grabbed in case it needs to be used as evidence.

are you implying some form of action against this site?

Guest wrote:

Dean wrote:

Guest wrote:Isn't a miscarriage the loss of a child? Perhaps we should all be upping the ante and sneering at those who have lost children too like Canary does

We? You’re just a cowardly guest...

And you’re a big brave boy because your posts say Dean next to them instead of Guest.

McAz wrote:

HobbitFeet wrote:

McAz wrote:
So do, for example, the rampant homophobic slurs etc on here - but who gives a fuck?

I'm not really following this whole conversation

why shouldn't people point out if they find something hurtful?
what new rules are there?

pointing out that something bothers you or pisses you off does not equate to wanting to stop it being said or for the post to be removed , it's just your right to voice an opinion on a post

So it wasn't an Admin instruction to stop talking about "womanliness", it was simply a comment by an Admin. Clearly, I misunderstood - but how are we supposed to know the difference?

Guest wrote:

Gigabit wrote:I apologised on DS if I upset anyone. I did not apologise “constantly” and I certainly won’t be apologising for having a different point of view. I won’t apologise for trolling or baiting on DS as I never did, not once. Unlike Wizzy and co who did constantly. What you call trolling I call criticising. For example posting bollocks and then me questioning it is not trolling. It is how arguments work. But that’s the problem with you Trifles, you don’t want a debate. You enjoy actually trolling and detailing threads.

You never baited.? Liar what were you banned for then?

McAz wrote:
So do, for example, the rampant homophobic slurs etc on here - but who gives a fuck?

McAz wrote:Has Hobs been struck dumb?

HobbitFeet wrote:

McAz wrote:

HobbitFeet wrote:

McAz wrote:
So do, for example, the rampant homophobic slurs etc on here - but who gives a fuck?

I'm not really following this whole conversation

why shouldn't people point out if they find something hurtful?
what new rules are there?

pointing out that something bothers you or pisses you off does not equate to wanting to stop it being said or for the post to be removed , it's just your right to voice an opinion on a post

So it wasn't an Admin instruction to stop talking about "womanliness", it was simply a comment by an Admin. Clearly, I misunderstood - but how are we supposed to know the difference?

you don't need to know the difference, if Admin asks nicely for something to stop it means that in that moment they want it to stop (for whatever reason) that doesn't mean that there is a new rule banning that word from ever being used again - if that ever happens I am sure it will be clearly explained

but you know this

McAz wrote:Has Hobs been struck dumb?

Guest wrote:Evidence? What for?

You state you enjoy fishing jra. Well shoving a sharp metal hook through its mouth, fighting it till the point of exhaustion, dragging it out of its natural environment so it can't breath, sounds like animal torture to me.

Puzzler wrote:

McAz wrote:
So do, for example, the rampant homophobic slurs etc on here - but who gives a fuck?

Yet you ignore the anti disabled slurs the stinking fat troll uses on a daily basis.

Guest wrote:

McAz wrote:Has Hobs been struck dumb?

why are you still meddling in all this, haven't your friends Canary and Dean already caused enough trouble?