DS Thread #110

Big Threads

Re: DS Thread #110

Postby Guest » Wed Feb 20, 2019 9:46 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:Can't help but feel a bit sorry for WaldoUK. I get the feeling she has no one else to talk to and is very lonely. Would she really be living out every minute detail of her life on DS if otherwise?


She's white.

So the fuck what? Racist c**t!
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS Thread #110

Postby jra » Wed Feb 20, 2019 9:49 pm

McAz wrote:
Guest wrote:
Dean wrote:
Jon wrote:Hypocritical wanker CRM providing another demonstration of the total lack of self awareness of DS remainers.

In a since-deleted comment by CRM quoted by Dundeeboy: "I'd endorse slow very drawn out torture for the likes of May, Farage, Boris and Mogg et al for the scam they've pulled off."

and then

"I don't think a lot of them [Brexiters] have any empathy at all."

Most of the remainers on there are full of the same shit. Funnily enough CRM's another frequent remainer poster who started posting in Showbiz/Big Brother and then exclusively in Politics. Seems to be a pattern.


No one cares mate...

What a relief you’re here to speak on behalf of everyone else. How did this place get by during those years when you didn’t grace us with your presence?

He speaks for all (some) of us - fuck off.


Bit presumptuous there. Fixed your post.
User avatar
jra
 
Posts: 16071
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 10:02 pm

Re: DS Thread #110

Postby Vam » Wed Feb 20, 2019 10:00 pm

Niv wrote:
Dinkydoobie wrote:
anais32 wrote:OK - well in the only other known case of a teenager ISIS bride with children who had Bangladeshi parents but only a British passport; the government lost and its decision to revoke citizenship was declared illegal. That is case law now.

Does that suffice?


https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... to-uk/p118

Does someone want to point out that in the case she's referring to the woman wasn't a teenager, she was 27, and anyone with bangladeshi parents who are considered citizens of bangladesh ( and who didn't attain citizenship by descent), and are under the age of 21, is a citizen of bangladesh, and has dual nationality/citizenship.


I'd save your breath, it seems Anais is the font of all knowledge. I raised the same point. Her Bangladeshi status, links and her age play a huge difference in this case, and those of other returnees. Anais and those that agree are as clueless.


You're either Talma, Helenemberry (?), Never Enough, Francie, Wandering Star, or Sutie. All of whom have been among those consistently talking sense over there, whilst niftily swatting away Anais' arrogance & Bolly's trolling.

What do I win? :mrgreen:
User avatar
Vam
 
Posts: 18120
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 10:57 am

Re: DS Thread #110

Postby Guest » Wed Feb 20, 2019 10:07 pm

Vam wrote:
Niv wrote:
Dinkydoobie wrote:
anais32 wrote:OK - well in the only other known case of a teenager ISIS bride with children who had Bangladeshi parents but only a British passport; the government lost and its decision to revoke citizenship was declared illegal. That is case law now.

Does that suffice?


https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... to-uk/p118

Does someone want to point out that in the case she's referring to the woman wasn't a teenager, she was 27, and anyone with bangladeshi parents who are considered citizens of bangladesh ( and who didn't attain citizenship by descent), and are under the age of 21, is a citizen of bangladesh, and has dual nationality/citizenship.


I'd save your breath, it seems Anais is the font of all knowledge. I raised the same point. Her Bangladeshi status, links and her age play a huge difference in this case, and those of other returnees. Anais and those that agree are as clueless.


You're either Talma, Helenemberry (?), Never Enough, Francie, Wandering Star, or Sutie. All of whom have been among those consistently talking sense over there, whilst niftily swatting away Anais' arrogance & Bolly's trolling.

What do I win? :mrgreen:



Talma disagreed with your post this morning. :cuppaT:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS Thread #110

Postby Niv » Wed Feb 20, 2019 10:15 pm

Vam wrote:
Niv wrote:
Dinkydoobie wrote:
anais32 wrote:OK - well in the only other known case of a teenager ISIS bride with children who had Bangladeshi parents but only a British passport; the government lost and its decision to revoke citizenship was declared illegal. That is case law now.

Does that suffice?


https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... to-uk/p118

Does someone want to point out that in the case she's referring to the woman wasn't a teenager, she was 27, and anyone with bangladeshi parents who are considered citizens of bangladesh ( and who didn't attain citizenship by descent), and are under the age of 21, is a citizen of bangladesh, and has dual nationality/citizenship.


I'd save your breath, it seems Anais is the font of all knowledge. I raised the same point. Her Bangladeshi status, links and her age play a huge difference in this case, and those of other returnees. Anais and those that agree are as clueless.


You're either Talma, Helenemberry (?), Never Enough, Francie, Wandering Star, or Sutie. All of whom have been among those consistently talking sense over there, whilst niftily swatting away Anais' arrogance & Bolly's trolling.

What do I win? :mrgreen:


I'm none of them. :smilin: I have to be honest when it comes to Anais, and her knowledge of the law I stay out of the threads. Life is too short to argue with idiots. :laughing:
User avatar
Niv
 
Posts: 1863
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2018 11:42 pm

Re: DS Thread #110

Postby Guest » Wed Feb 20, 2019 10:15 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:Animasana has gone to ground since she was rightly rounded upon earlier in the ISIS thread for not knowing what she's talking about. Thick bint.


Anus-masana is an idiot but not alone. Quite a few of them on their make absolute fools of themselves especially when they try to sound clever or knowledgeable but just fuck it up. Arrogant and dumb isn’t exactly a winning combination. :gigglesnshit:



That's exactly it. Why do people like Anus keep flapping their gums when they could save themselves a lot of embarrassment by just keeping schtum on topics they clearly know fuck all about. :cuppaT:

If everyone on DS did that the place would be tumbleweed central :laughing:



On the plus side, idiots like Anusmania give the rest of us plenty to point and jeer at, like the underprivileged underclass of any society. :cuppaT:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS Thread #110

Postby HobbitFeet » Wed Feb 20, 2019 10:25 pm

Dinkydoobie wrote:
Guest wrote:Unless you can’t because you were banned from DS for spewing your dumb racism on there :dafinger:


Actually i got banned because i was using a VPN lol

Then i got banned for "blank email reason"




you got banned for your misogynistic shit

one minute you're arguing about how bitches deserve it innit, the next you were gone forever

but you know that makes you look a twat, why else not just admit it
User avatar
HobbitFeet
Site Admin
 
Posts: 10521
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 2:29 pm

Re: DS Thread #110

Postby Vam » Wed Feb 20, 2019 10:28 pm

Niv wrote:I'm none of them. :smilin: I have to be honest when it comes to Anais, and her knowledge of the law I stay out of the threads. Life is too short to argue with idiots. :laughing:


She's a piece of work, isn't she? :mrgreen: And no one will ever convince me Bolly isn't on a permanent wind-up, every single time she logs in there.
User avatar
Vam
 
Posts: 18120
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 10:57 am

Re: DS Thread #110

Postby Vam » Wed Feb 20, 2019 10:34 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:Animasana has gone to ground since she was rightly rounded upon earlier in the ISIS thread for not knowing what she's talking about. Thick bint.


Anus-masana is an idiot but not alone. Quite a few of them on their make absolute fools of themselves especially when they try to sound clever or knowledgeable but just fuck it up. Arrogant and dumb isn’t exactly a winning combination. :gigglesnshit:



That's exactly it. Why do people like Anus keep flapping their gums when they could save themselves a lot of embarrassment by just keeping schtum on topics they clearly know fuck all about. :cuppaT:

If everyone on DS did that the place would be tumbleweed central :laughing:



On the plus side, idiots like Anusmania give the rest of us plenty to point and jeer at, like the underprivileged underclass of any society. :cuppaT:


You seem very obsessed with the word 'anus'. Does that make you a piece of fly-blown baghead shit? :smilin:
User avatar
Vam
 
Posts: 18120
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 10:57 am

Re: DS Thread #110

Postby Guest » Wed Feb 20, 2019 10:39 pm

Vam wrote:
Niv wrote:I'm none of them. :smilin: I have to be honest when it comes to Anais, and her knowledge of the law I stay out of the threads. Life is too short to argue with idiots. :laughing:


She's a piece of work, isn't she? :mrgreen: And no one will ever convince me Bolly isn't on a permanent wind-up, every single time she logs in there.




Who are you on DS then?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS Thread #110

Postby Guest » Wed Feb 20, 2019 10:41 pm

Vam wrote:
Niv wrote:
Dinkydoobie wrote:
anais32 wrote:OK - well in the only other known case of a teenager ISIS bride with children who had Bangladeshi parents but only a British passport; the government lost and its decision to revoke citizenship was declared illegal. That is case law now.

Does that suffice?


https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... to-uk/p118

Does someone want to point out that in the case she's referring to the woman wasn't a teenager, she was 27, and anyone with bangladeshi parents who are considered citizens of bangladesh ( and who didn't attain citizenship by descent), and are under the age of 21, is a citizen of bangladesh, and has dual nationality/citizenship.


I'd save your breath, it seems Anais is the font of all knowledge. I raised the same point. Her Bangladeshi status, links and her age play a huge difference in this case, and those of other returnees. Anais and those that agree are as clueless.


You're either Talma, Helenemberry (?), Never Enough, Francie, Wandering Star, or Sutie. All of whom have been among those consistently talking sense over there, whilst niftily swatting away Anais' arrogance & Bolly's trolling.

What do I win? :mrgreen:

never enough, francie and sutie are among the biggest dickheads currently on DS

You win a place in that elite echelon of ignoramuses. Congrats! :thumbsup:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS Thread #110

Postby Guest » Wed Feb 20, 2019 10:49 pm

Vam wrote:
You seem very obsessed with the word 'anus'. Does that make you a piece of fly-blown baghead shit? :smilin:


The other guest has no imagination or creativity and has hijacked anais's nickname. Anais has been known for years as Anus, the other guest wasn't clever enough to make up a name of their own to insult you with. I'm guessing it's someone as lame as numbertwat.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS Thread #110

Postby Niv » Wed Feb 20, 2019 10:52 pm

Vam wrote:
Niv wrote:I'm none of them. :smilin: I have to be honest when it comes to Anais, and her knowledge of the law I stay out of the threads. Life is too short to argue with idiots. :laughing:


She's a piece of work, isn't she? :mrgreen: And no one will ever convince me Bolly isn't on a permanent wind-up, every single time she logs in there.


She certainly is, all of that patronising, condescending clap trap she spends hoooooours typing out. :laughing: Bolly certainly seems to be a wind-up merchant, the pair of them make me laugh. :gigglesnshit:
User avatar
Niv
 
Posts: 1863
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2018 11:42 pm

Re: DS Thread #110

Postby Guest » Wed Feb 20, 2019 10:52 pm

While landis' juvenile attempts at debate are good for a laugh, when you think about it, it's pretty scary that someone can come through our school system and be such an utter, contemptible moron. He's literally the worst communicator I've ever encountered.

He's like a young james (lauren) harries but that was dropped on his head as a child, attempting to debate with adults and in a permanent state of petulant tantrum because they are disagreeing with him.

Still, good that nearly all of his posts get ignored these days. Even old bolly gets more replies!

Also, fuck knows why he thinks bolding strengthens the cancer he seemingly thinks is a cogent 'point'. Try focusing on the words rather than the formatting glandy boy. Fucking tosser!
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS Thread #110

Postby Dinkydoobie » Wed Feb 20, 2019 10:57 pm

HobbitFeet wrote:you got banned for your misogynistic shit


No i didn't. I got banned when i was posting in a thread about the terrorist attack in germany for "speculation", then i presume i got banned for using a VPN and my final ban didn't even give a fucking reason.

so go and fuck yourself. :thumbsup:
User avatar
Dinkydoobie
 
Posts: 2081
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 2:47 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests