DS and DTV Part 42.

Big Threads

Re: DS and DTV Part 42.

Postby Guest » Mon Aug 29, 2016 9:17 am

Ray of Sunshine wrote:Message to PC DS mods, just came across this article in The Guardian:

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/jul/04/marriage-first-cousins-birth-defects

So you banned me for starting a thread on something even The Guardian has covered.

Congrats on being even more PC/censorious than The Guardian.

(And yes I was a PBU so I'm not asking for reinstatement).


How can you be sure that wasn't the reason?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 42.

Postby Guest » Mon Aug 29, 2016 9:25 am

PinkSmurf wrote:Have you seen the house an immigrant thread? There is absolutely no way on earth I'd house an immigrant. They could do anything like rape or kill you or steal from you.


You do know ex squaddies or English people could rape and kill you too, right? I'd be more worried about a squaddie slitting my throat.

Surely most people who take in lodgers or who exhibit human kindness do it to any human being, rather than trying to segregate those based on what part of the globe they just happened to be born in.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 42.

Postby Cherry de Voured » Mon Aug 29, 2016 9:28 am

Ray of Sunshine wrote:
PinkSmurf wrote:As for housing Muslims, no bloody way either. If you must take a lodger there are plenty of British homeless people including ex armed forces who could do with getting off the streets


You'd take a trained killer with PTSD into your home?

I'd rather take in a Romanian TBH.


My problem with the "immigration vs. homelessness" argument is always that people only ever seem to give a shit about the homeless whenever the immigration debate arises. Outside of that, I don't know how many of those who use this argument (and I'm not accusing anyone here of doing the same) actually give a real shit.
User avatar
Cherry de Voured
 
Posts: 685
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:21 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 42.

Postby malamute » Mon Aug 29, 2016 9:51 am

jesaya wrote:
malamute wrote:]
malamute wrote:
jesaya wrote:


You only recognise it as a bitch because you are one yourself. Along with your superior intelligence ( :pmsl: ) you now have X-ray eyes do you? You and RancidAnne think you are such fucking know-it-Alls.


No, I recognise it as a bitch because it has a pink collar.


Talk about sexist! This is 2016 you know. You hang out too much with RancidAnne in her Berlingo. :pmsl:


I am happy to agree I may have persuaded myself that it must be a bitch, given that is so fitting a choice for you.


So I'm a bitch because I tell you what I think (as do plenty of others)? Nobody is fooled by you at all. Every time anybody on here or on D Spy gets one over on you you ignore their comments and just rant on about something else. Time and time again it's happened and you just keep singing from your hymn sheet and disregard anybody else's opinion except of course Rancid Anne's. :pmsl: "oh yes Anne, good point. Well said. IF only everybody else were like us, the world would be a perfect place and we could solve the migrant crisis by lunchtime." :pmsl: :flog: :pmsl: :flog:

"oh Jesaya I do hope you like the photos of myself which I sent you. You might like to order some of the cotton traders drawstring waist trousers for yourself since I look so good in them. The wide fitting sandals would also look good on you and would allow your bunions extra space. My husband is trying to get me sectioned but he will never manage that while I have such a great friend as you will he?" :bum:
User avatar
malamute
 
Posts: 1562
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:03 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 42.

Postby Guest » Mon Aug 29, 2016 9:57 am

Cherry de Voured wrote:
Ray of Sunshine wrote:
PinkSmurf wrote:As for housing Muslims, no bloody way either. If you must take a lodger there are plenty of British homeless people including ex armed forces who could do with getting off the streets


You'd take a trained killer with PTSD into your home?

I'd rather take in a Romanian TBH.


My problem with the "immigration vs. homelessness" argument is always that people only ever seem to give a shit about the homeless whenever the immigration debate arises. Outside of that, I don't know how many of those who use this argument (and I'm not accusing anyone here of doing the same) actually give a real shit.

I agree. In regards to soldiers that are homeless due to PTSD or similar I think it should be a government responsibility to help and support them and they should not have to rely on charity.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 42.

Postby Guest » Mon Aug 29, 2016 10:57 am

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
malamute wrote:Minnie is head and shoulders above you in most debates, so yes, she owns you over and over again!


Other way round I'd say. Sorry. :carryon:


Minnie raises points, gets to the point and is usually on point.

Jesaya talks in circles constantly, makes excuses and raises apologist nonsense and patronises anyone who disagrees with her (that's if shes not getting them banned).

#teamminnie


Minnie gets aggressive, and rants at those she doesn't agree with. She will have all the racists and the xenophobes on side, regardless what she says.

She also calls decent debate and multiple points, 'waffle' which shows her up in these debates. Never have I see that waffle word more misused than on here. Whenever you see someone use it incorrectly, it just makes the person saying it look either flat our stupid or too dumb to understand basic English.


Are you sure you mean Minnie?
I've never seen her rant or be aggressive, if you dont like her cool but dont lie. :dunno: plus shes right saying Jesaya waffles on, she does.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 42.

Postby Guest » Mon Aug 29, 2016 11:03 am

malamute wrote:
jesaya wrote:
malamute wrote:]
malamute wrote:
jesaya wrote:


You only recognise it as a bitch because you are one yourself. Along with your superior intelligence ( :pmsl: ) you now have X-ray eyes do you? You and RancidAnne think you are such fucking know-it-Alls.


No, I recognise it as a bitch because it has a pink collar.


Talk about sexist! This is 2016 you know. You hang out too much with RancidAnne in her Berlingo. :pmsl:


I am happy to agree I may have persuaded myself that it must be a bitch, given that is so fitting a choice for you.


So I'm a bitch because I tell you what I think (as do plenty of others)? Nobody is fooled by you at all. Every time anybody on here or on D Spy gets one over on you you ignore their comments and just rant on about something else. Time and time again it's happened and you just keep singing from your hymn sheet and disregard anybody else's opinion except of course Rancid Anne's. :pmsl: "oh yes Anne, good point. Well said. IF only everybody else were like us, the world would be a perfect place and we could solve the migrant crisis by lunchtime." :pmsl: :flog: :pmsl: :flog:

"oh Jesaya I do hope you like the photos of myself which I sent you. You might like to order some of the cotton traders drawstring waist trousers for yourself since I look so good in them. The wide fitting sandals would also look good on you and would allow your bunions extra space. My husband is trying to get me sectioned but he will never manage that while I have such a great friend as you will he?" :bum:

You clearly are a bitch with all that nasty shite.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 42.

Postby Guest » Mon Aug 29, 2016 11:21 am

Another one crawls out from under a rock at the bottom of the scummy pond.


http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=2177215
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 42.

Postby PinkSmurf » Mon Aug 29, 2016 11:27 am

Ray of Sunshine wrote:
PinkSmurf wrote:As for housing Muslims, no bloody way either. If you must take a lodger there are plenty of British homeless people including ex armed forces who could do with getting off the streets


You'd take a trained killer with PTSD into your home?

I'd rather take in a Romanian TBH.

If I had a second bedroom and was allowed a lodger I would take a homeless ex soldier, preferably a woman. So yes I would.
User avatar
PinkSmurf
 
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:14 am
Location: London

Re: DS and DTV Part 42.

Postby Guest » Mon Aug 29, 2016 11:35 am

PinkSmurf wrote:
Ray of Sunshine wrote:
PinkSmurf wrote:As for housing Muslims, no bloody way either. If you must take a lodger there are plenty of British homeless people including ex armed forces who could do with getting off the streets


You'd take a trained killer with PTSD into your home?

I'd rather take in a Romanian TBH.

If I had a second bedroom and was allowed a lodger I would take a homeless ex soldier, preferably a woman. So yes I would.

Would you take in a homeless ex soldier who was a Muslim?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 42.

Postby PinkSmurf » Mon Aug 29, 2016 11:42 am

Guest wrote:
PinkSmurf wrote:
Ray of Sunshine wrote:
PinkSmurf wrote:As for housing Muslims, no bloody way either. If you must take a lodger there are plenty of British homeless people including ex armed forces who could do with getting off the streets


You'd take a trained killer with PTSD into your home?

I'd rather take in a Romanian TBH.

If I had a second bedroom and was allowed a lodger I would take a homeless ex soldier, preferably a woman. So yes I would.

Would you take in a homeless ex soldier who was a Muslim?

If she was British and served for the UK yes I would.
User avatar
PinkSmurf
 
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:14 am
Location: London

Re: DS and DTV Part 42.

Postby Guest » Mon Aug 29, 2016 12:04 pm

Guest wrote:Are you sure you mean Minnie?
I've never seen her rant or be aggressive, if you dont like her cool but dont lie. :dunno: plus shes right saying Jesaya waffles on, she does.


Waffle seems to only be used when the poster can't (or won't) address the points made. All it does is make the person saying waffle look a bit simple, or lacking in a counter argument or ideas, especially on a discussion forum. It's a lazy go-to word for those not bright enough to counter the other poster.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 42.

Postby Puzzler » Mon Aug 29, 2016 12:17 pm

Guest wrote:Another one crawls out from under a rock at the bottom of the scummy pond.


http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=2177215

I take it you support politically motivated police persecution of someone for daring to upset the 'community' then? Funny how you lefties proclaim to be pro human rights whenever some hate preacher is taking the piss out the system but not for someone who's life is literally in danger every day from followers of said hate preachers. You're the real scum pal.
User avatar
Puzzler
 
Posts: 7172
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:07 pm
Location: A brave new world

Previous

Return to The Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests