DS and DTV Part 46.

[Guest]

THE ROTHERHAM VICTIMS ARE RAAAAAAAAAAAACIST!

What a disgusting thing to say Puzzles, you jihadi loving twat.

I was parodying SJWs COS I'M FUCKING SICK OF THEM INFESTING THIS FORUM.

The only thing you're a parody of is a loony cunt.

[gUEST]

Yeah you know to stay quiet!

Rare red Kermit melting down into a drug-induced blob alert.

[Puzzler]

THE ROTHERHAM VICTIMS ARE RAAAAAAAAAAAACIST!

What a disgusting thing to say Puzzles, you jihadi loving twat.

I was parodying SJWs COS I'M FUCKING SICK OF THEM INFESTING THIS FORUM.

The only thing you're a parody of is a loony cunt.

I'm not the one who thinks everything's racist you mad bastard. You are evil, I hope you do know that

[Guest]

ffs leave Puzzler alone. He has problems so just ignore him.

[Puzzler]

Yeah you know to stay quiet!

Rare red Kermit melting down into a drug-induced blob alert.

Baghead who shakes in his boots at the idea of revealing his DS ID

[Odessa Steps]

The comments that have been about my post have made me realise something, I don't belong here, I'm NOT racist,

It's been fun but it's not for me.

Because of course as a liberal I should just be delighted that all the terrorism in Europe and abuse of children in Rotheram is entirely my fault and not say a thing when such comments are so celebrated? Bollocks to that... if people want to give out such outrageous claims then I'm going to make them as well.

[Guest]

THE ROTHERHAM VICTIMS ARE RAAAAAAAAAAAACIST!

What a disgusting thing to say Puzzles, you jihadi loving twat.

I was parodying SJWs COS I'M FUCKING SICK OF THEM INFESTING THIS FORUM.

The only thing you're a parody of is a loony cunt.

I'm not the one who thinks everything's racist you mad bastard. You are evil, I hope you do know that

Evil???


hahahahahahahahaha


You dickhead.

[Odessa Steps]

ANYONE WHO THROWS THE WORD RACIST ROUND LIKE CONFETTI TOO. CUNTS THE LOT OF THEM.

Are you referring to me Puzzler?

[Guest]

Yeah you know to stay quiet!

Rare red Kermit melting down into a drug-induced blob alert.

Baghead who shakes in his boots at the idea of revealing his DS ID

I'm . . . . . I'm . . . . . I'm . . . . . too shy Puzzles.

[Frankly]

Sorry if you decide to go Velvet Cat. You're one of the good poster on here. Just ignore the thickos who are too stupid to understand true racism.

Have some posts been removed?

[Guest]

Sorry if you decide to go Velvet Cat. You're one of the good poster on here. Just ignore the thickos who are too stupid to understand true racism.

Have some posts been removed?

it looks like it, i was trying to find the quote of velvet cat's that others have quoted and i've either been struck blind or it's disappeared

i liked Velvet Cat

[Frankly]

Sorry if you decide to go Velvet Cat. You're one of the good poster on here. Just ignore the thickos who are too stupid to understand true racism.

Have some posts been removed?

it looks like it, i was trying to find the quote of velvet cat's that others have quoted and i've either been struck blind or it's disappeared

i liked Velvet Cat

Yes, I was too. I hope she changes her mind.

[Puzzler]

ANYONE WHO THROWS THE WORD RACIST ROUND LIKE CONFETTI TOO. CUNTS THE LOT OF THEM.

Are you referring to me Puzzler?

Nope - anyway, sad to see Velvet Cat feel she has to leave

[Si_Crewe]

People seem to be struggling with the whole 'normals' thing but it's always been crystal clear to me.

Most normal people consider child rape to be very bad. If there is clear evidence of mass child rape being committed, normal people would want it it investigated and dealt with using the full force of the law.

Many labour / liberal / sjw types prefer to cover it up or pretend it isn't happening and allow the mass child rape to continue. For well over a decade. As happened in Rotherham and many many other places. Need I remind anyone of the "not rock the multicultural boat" quote? Many people find this type of thinking very, very far from 'normal'.

Other examples - we have a robust and respected disclosure barring service policy that protects, for example, school children from potentially dangerous adults when they are in school. Most normal people agree with this policy. Liberal / sjw types are perfectly happy to completely abandoned it (and indeed, any other form of vetting whatsoever) for unknown migrants of adult appearance who come from territories with a proven track record of producing both murderous terrorists and people who lie about their age. Many folk find this complete lack of logic and selective abandonment of processes designed to protect children, completely fucking abnormal.

Final shortie - last summer, migrant crisis, normal people predicted it would sadly likely result in rape and terrorism, sjws / liberals scoffed and said no way! Then Paris and Cologne happened. Nuff said.

Examples from ds: any Rotherham thread, current Calais 'children' thread, last summer's big migrants threads etc.

Hope that sheds some light on the situation.

Great to see you back GLM, and agree with the points you have made

Disappointed in you VC. I didn't have you down as a racist troll

Fact is anyone agreeing with that diatribe pretty much must be.

That "diatribe" strikes me as highlighting foolish naivety and absurdly dangerous political-correctness rather than being racist.

[kittimus]

People seem to be struggling with the whole 'normals' thing but it's always been crystal clear to me.

Most normal people consider child rape to be very bad. If there is clear evidence of mass child rape being committed, normal people would want it it investigated and dealt with using the full force of the law.

Many labour / liberal / sjw types prefer to cover it up or pretend it isn't happening and allow the mass child rape to continue. For well over a decade. As happened in Rotherham and many many other places. Need I remind anyone of the "not rock the multicultural boat" quote? Many people find this type of thinking very, very far from 'normal'.

Other examples - we have a robust and respected disclosure barring service policy that protects, for example, school children from potentially dangerous adults when they are in school. Most normal people agree with this policy. Liberal / sjw types are perfectly happy to completely abandoned it (and indeed, any other form of vetting whatsoever) for unknown migrants of adult appearance who come from territories with a proven track record of producing both murderous terrorists and people who lie about their age. Many folk find this complete lack of logic and selective abandonment of processes designed to protect children, completely fucking abnormal.

Final shortie - last summer, migrant crisis, normal people predicted it would sadly likely result in rape and terrorism, sjws / liberals scoffed and said no way! Then Paris and Cologne happened. Nuff said.

Examples from ds: any Rotherham thread, current Calais 'children' thread, last summer's big migrants threads etc.

Hope that sheds some light on the situation.

Great to see you back GLM, and agree with the points you have made

Disappointed in you VC. I didn't have you down as a racist troll

Fact is anyone agreeing with that diatribe pretty much must be.

That "diatribe" strikes me as highlighting foolish naivety and absurdly dangerous political-correctness rather than being racist.

That'll be because you don't have SJW blinkers on