DS and DTV Part 53

Big Threads

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby Nucks » Sat Feb 25, 2017 12:23 pm

jra wrote:
Am I. That wasn't really the point though was it. There are plenty of other shithole towns in the UK, any one of which could have been mentioned.


Can I ask a question? You've said a few times that you don't care what people think of you online, we're all anonymous, etc., but the way your replies are often worded would indicate that some of the stuff said DOES bother you. Does it bother you?

No one is denying your right to post, just wondering if you're honest about your claim that you don't care. Didn't you say you did a search on your name here if you've been away for a while? That's not really something a person who doesn't give a stuff would do. :dunno:
User avatar
Nucks
 
Posts: 9032
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:59 am
Location: Behind the curtains

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby Staliaoftheknife » Sat Feb 25, 2017 12:37 pm

Perpetual wrote:
Staliaoftheknife wrote:
guest wrote:So what if jra sees escorts? Do any of you believe in a woman's right to work as an escort? Without the clients they wouldn't make any money, think about that. Personally I think brothels should be legal, it's safer for women to work together. I have no problem with escorts, brothels or their clients.

This I agree with, it should at least be decriminalised, that way at least the woman can have health check ect and some semblance of safety.



Me too, absolutely. There will always be the sad cases of desperate 'local' ones though, used, and abused for £20 a go. :shake head: :grrrrr:

That true. I think they're all used and abused though regardless of the price they charge.
User avatar
Staliaoftheknife
 
Posts: 103
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 8:01 pm

Re: DS and DTVGuest Part 53

Postby VR6storm » Sat Feb 25, 2017 12:42 pm

Guest wrote: I keep my skeletons private. You choose to share them then cry when they come back to haunt you.

Now about you putting the working-woman's pleasure before your own - do you think that make you a nice guy in the glazed eyes of the prossie?


I posted pretty much the same thing yesterday. To slightly alter the quote JR 'tha responded with, some fuckers never learn. :more beer:
User avatar
VR6storm
 
Posts: 2082
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2014 5:43 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby Guest » Sat Feb 25, 2017 12:45 pm

guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
guest wrote:So what if jra sees escorts? Do any of you believe in a woman's right to work as an escort? Without the clients they wouldn't make any money, think about that. Personally I think brothels should be legal, it's safer for women to work together. I have no problem with escorts, brothels or their clients.


So you'd be happy if your daughter wanted to pursue a career as a prostitute and shag blokes like JAR for a living?

If she wanted to that's up to her. There are mother and daughters who run brothels together.


Would you be her first customer?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby Lambert » Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:12 pm

guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
guest wrote:So what if jra sees escorts? Do any of you believe in a woman's right to work as an escort? Without the clients they wouldn't make any money, think about that. Personally I think brothels should be legal, it's safer for women to work together. I have no problem with escorts, brothels or their clients.


So you'd be happy if your daughter wanted to pursue a career as a prostitute and shag blokes like JAR for a living?

If she wanted to that's up to her. There are mother and daughters who run brothels together.


Of course it's up to the daughter, but no good parent would ever be happy with their child becoming a prostitute.
User avatar
Lambert
 
Posts: 3151
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2015 10:07 am

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby Guest » Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:19 pm

guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
guest wrote:So what if jra sees escorts? Do any of you believe in a woman's right to work as an escort? Without the clients they wouldn't make any money, think about that. Personally I think brothels should be legal, it's safer for women to work together. I have no problem with escorts, brothels or their clients.


So you'd be happy if your daughter wanted to pursue a career as a prostitute and shag blokes like JAR for a living?

If she wanted to that's up to her.

I get the sneaking suspicion you don't have a daughter nor ever likely to have one. :whistle:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby jra » Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:06 pm

Guest wrote:
jra wrote:
George wrote:
jra wrote:
Crestfallen of Tonbridge Wells wrote:*Sigh*

Remember when this DS and DTV thread was about DS and DTV and not jra's disgusting sex life or that being a fat arse or skinny makes you a hypersensitive snowflake.

Those were the days.


Foxy wrote:Bloody hell, the number of times you mention your degree anyone would think you're the only poster here who has one.

And also, banging on about buying someone a meal and a drink means you might get sex at the end of the night, me and my partner are going out with another couple tonight who are paying. I hope they're not expecting a foursome :gigglesnshit:


Don't want to talk about it, then people shouldn't bring the subject up in the first place. I've already said words to the effect, this is old news. This has been done to death, but some people won't let it drop.

Nobody mentioned anything about degrees


I did George, a few posts above.

That was the point. You complained people shouldn't bring things up. Nobody brought up your degree. YOU did.


Nitpicking or what. It was pertinent to the relevant where some poster said I had the mental age of ten.
User avatar
jra
 
Posts: 18197
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 9:02 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby jra » Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:14 pm

Guest wrote:Don't post controversial shit if you don't want to be pulled up on it.


That's fair enough, but these posts happened ages ago. But, somebody in their right mind thought they'd re-resurrect the subject again for the troll factor. It's raking up old coals, all discussed previously. Time to move on. It's not like I made some of these posts in the last week or so. Somebody even went to the trouble of resurrecting a post I made about my member. This has gone far beyond being pulled up for a post or posts, it's plain and simple forum bullying by a pack of anonymous keyboard warriors.

As you were.
User avatar
jra
 
Posts: 18197
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 9:02 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby Guest » Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:18 pm

jra wrote:
Nitpicking or what. It was pertinent to the relevant where some poster said I had the mental age of ten.

It isn't nitpicking - it's a fact.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby Guest » Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:18 pm

jra wrote:
Guest wrote:Don't post controversial shit if you don't want to be pulled up on it.


That's fair enough, but these posts happened ages ago. But, somebody in their right mind thought they'd re-resurrect the subject again for the troll factor. It's raking up old coals, all discussed previously. Time to move on. It's not like I made some of these posts in the last week or so. Somebody even went to the trouble of resurrecting a post I made about my member. This has gone far beyond being pulled up for a post or posts, it's plain and simple forum bullying by a pack of anonymous keyboard warriors.

As you were.


And that's exactly how you come across as a keyboard warrior
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby jra » Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:19 pm

guest wrote:
guest wrote:So what if jra sees escorts? Do any of you believe in a woman's right to work as an escort? Without the clients they wouldn't make any money, think about that. Personally I think brothels should be legal, it's safer for women to work together. I have no problem with escorts, brothels or their clients.


I don't think anyone has a problem with that. They have a problem with JRA posting great detail as minnie put it about his "cum, cock and prossies" or something, when no one is even discussing that. Out of the blue and always towards young birds, now thats a bit off by anyones standards.

Then he bitches when hes brought up on it, calls everyone prudes and to get a life. If he doesn't want it discussed then dont fucking tell us about it. It aint rocket science, but no he wants to spill that shit anywhere he can, then moan if people mention it. Same as Jp bitch and moan for about 50pages about being called skinny, then bitch at women for being over weight. Pair of plonkers, both of them.


Get back to me when you stop using the bullshit translator. Always (really always) towards young birds. Get out of here. I want to spill that shit shit anywhere I can. Again bullshit. I only post on two message boards.
User avatar
jra
 
Posts: 18197
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 9:02 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby Guest » Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:19 pm

jra wrote:
Guest wrote:Don't post controversial shit if you don't want to be pulled up on it.


That's fair enough, but these posts happened ages ago. But, somebody in their right mind thought they'd re-resurrect the subject again for the troll factor. It's raking up old coals, all discussed previously. Time to move on. It's not like I made some of these posts in the last week or so. Somebody even went to the trouble of resurrecting a post I made about my member. This has gone far beyond being pulled up for a post or posts, it's plain and simple forum bullying by a pack of anonymous keyboard warriors.

As you were.

"Your member"? :pointlaugh:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby Junglejayne » Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:20 pm

jra wrote:
Guest wrote:Don't post controversial shit if you don't want to be pulled up on it.


That's fair enough, but these posts happened ages ago. But, somebody in their right mind thought they'd re-resurrect the subject again for the troll factor. It's raking up old coals, all discussed previously. Time to move on. It's not like I made some of these posts in the last week or so. Somebody even went to the trouble of resurrecting a post I made about my member. This has gone far beyond being pulled up for a post or posts, it's plain and simple forum bullying by a pack of anonymous keyboard warriors.

As you were.


And you play along with it. If you really wanted to move on you just wouldn't engage and those dragging it up would be wasting their time :dunno:
User avatar
Junglejayne
 
Posts: 6882
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2015 3:53 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby jra » Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:21 pm

Perpetual wrote:
Staliaoftheknife wrote:
guest wrote:So what if jra sees escorts? Do any of you believe in a woman's right to work as an escort? Without the clients they wouldn't make any money, think about that. Personally I think brothels should be legal, it's safer for women to work together. I have no problem with escorts, brothels or their clients.

This I agree with, it should at least be decriminalised, that way at least the woman can have health check ect and some semblance of safety.



Me too, absolutely. There will always be the sad cases of desperate 'local' ones though, used, and abused for £20 a go. :shake head: :grrrrr:


I thought better of you until you waded in high fiving Vams post.
User avatar
jra
 
Posts: 18197
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 9:02 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby jra » Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:27 pm

Canucklehead wrote:
jra wrote:
Am I. That wasn't really the point though was it. There are plenty of other shithole towns in the UK, any one of which could have been mentioned.


Can I ask a question? You've said a few times that you don't care what people think of you online, we're all anonymous, etc., but the way your replies are often worded would indicate that some of the stuff said DOES bother you. Does it bother you?

No one is denying your right to post, just wondering if you're honest about your claim that you don't care. Didn't you say you did a search on your name here if you've been away for a while? That's not really something a person who doesn't give a stuff would do. :dunno:


No. I don't care really, but I don't see the need to endlessly drag up posts that I made ages ago, which have already been discussed at length. It's like going down to the pub and a mate of yours says 'do you remember that conservation we had on <insert subject> a year ago'. It's history.

Some people on here must be really bored to go to the trouble of digging up old posts of mine that should be consigned to history.
User avatar
jra
 
Posts: 18197
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 9:02 pm

Previous

Return to The Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests