Guest wrote:NastyNickers wrote:jra wrote:However, you've got nothing to say about the original post I quoted.
Your problem is not about my views on women regarding favoritism in legal terms, i.e. it's not misogyny you idiot. Your problem is with me, otherwise you would have said something about the poster I quoted.
https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_87375971https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_87376749And, if you're going to have a go at me regarding misogyny you might at least attempt to spell the word correctly without a capital letter as well. It can't be that hard, surely.
Oh I agree with you. The post you quoted deserves a mention, for being full of shit. Did anyone on that thread agree with the woman being discussed in the opening post? The only post I can recall that almost did was RebelScum, and I think s/he was just stating what 'tradition' is rather than saying you should.
You know what drives me potty, you get one example of some woman being a cunt, and suddenly it turns into women being all about the money. Equating women to vultures.
It's no different to posters like Face ache (awaits incoming ranty defence of her) banging on about MRAs. The feminazi or extreme feminist types on DS are no different but rarely do you see people criticise them too. Just when a man does it. Hardly very equal is it.
There's only a couple of what I'd would consider an extreme feminist on DS, and faceache isn't on of them. I think I probably lurk the equality threads most (which is why I've usually got an opinion on them), and I can't say I've seen faceache in them all that much. No more than other posters, certainly less than the likes of Retford and Stoatie.
Having said all that. I have seen plenty of people criticising women, as much as men. If a woman is in the wrong posters will pick up on it. I have a feeling though your idea and my idea of a woman being in the wrong are completely different, and it's there thenproblem lies.