jra wrote:NastyNickers wrote:Of course you needed to. How the hell do you expect any one to know what you mean otherwise? It wasn't at all obvious.
Some/
most women doesn't excuse it.
Some/
most is still a shitty view. Most women are decent human beings, like most men.
I love how it's ok for you to take things literally all the time, but when you
think I'm doing it, you feel like you're talking to a 5 year old.
Not obvious it seems to you. There's the difference. You seem to need to be spoon fed.
If I was in a pub with you right now, I would have walked away already, as in we'll agree to disagree. I've got better things to do than have a long protracted debate about this, like watching the cricket.
It's £1300 too much to spend. As in don't ever get married if you are a man, unless you want to be bled dry come divorce (which happens for 1 in 2-3 marriages) or have children. From a legal point of view, the odds are well stacked against men.
That's means at least two thirds of women are not applicable regarding divorce. One in three. Get it. As for children, I'm saying nothing. I've already it many times before. But do carry on. I look forward to your next installment, but now I have rewind to find out the last two wicket losses in the Lancashire Thunder vs Surrey Stars KIA Womens Super League (channel 404 on Sky). That'll be £50 for the inconvenience. Cheques are acceptable.
Not at all obvious. You were replying to a post discussing hypocritical women. There was no hint you were discussing women on DS only. And as I said before, even if you did mean the women of DS, it's still a ridiculous post.
You're trying to wriggle out of it, all semantics and
this what I really meant. You were discussing never getting married, because you'll be bled dry. That doesn't relate to only the women who get divorced.
We wouldn't be having a discussion in the pub. At all.