McAz wrote:I didn't (and wouldn't) want to live in the shithouse that was the East End of London before our friends from the sub-continent moved in.
I'm delightfully tolerant - I wish them well and I hope they enjoy it.
Trapper John wrote:McAz wrote:I didn't (and wouldn't) want to live in the shithouse that was the East End of London before our friends from the sub-continent moved in.
I'm delightfully tolerant - I wish them well and I hope they enjoy it.
Why is that, because of all the Jews?
Red Okktober wrote:Being 'tolerant' seems to have some kind of weird psychotic effect on liberals, lefties, apologists, and various other assorted weak-minded, lily-livered politically correct do-gooders. It makes them lose all sense of reason, and has become the Holy Grail of liberalism.
it's the modern day version of self-flagellation or wearing a hair shirt.
Advocating mass immigration, letting terrorists, sex pests, murderers etc. in in huge numbers, where common sense must tell them this a bad thing to do. But wait...no...they want to be able to say they were 'tolerant' of these people. Fuck knows why.
The funny thing is, despite craving to be seen as being tolerant, these legions of liberal halfwits, the length and breadth of the country, only seem to tolerate things that are obviously bad for the rest of the country. Otherwise they want to ban, censor, or shut down things that don't fit the liberal ideal. In effect, they are the least tolerant people you could ever meet.
Stooo wrote:Why do you have a problem with equality?
What (god forbid) if the donor for the failing piece of granite that you call a heart was a gay, Islamic Nigerian and you had knowledge of it before the op?
Red Okktober wrote:Stooo wrote:Why do you have a problem with equality?
What (god forbid) if the donor for the failing piece of granite that you call a heart was a gay, Islamic Nigerian and you had knowledge of it before the op?
It's got nothing to do with equality - do you think it has?
It's about common sense. You can't just let everyone into this country who wants to come here, just so you can be seen as being tolerant. You can't just let the growth of a vile insidious culture (islam) go unchecked, just so you can be seen as being tolerant.
You're pressing the self-destruct button on behalf of everyone else. Because we haven't self-destructed yet, doesn't mean it's ok to carry on tolerating things that are harmful to us.
If you truly believed in equality, you'd be respecting the votes of the people who voted for Brexit and Trump, instead of referring to them as idiots at every opportunity. Like I said, liberals are the least tolerant group of people you could ever meet - 'ban this' 'close this down' 'censor that' etc.
Stooo wrote:It's got everything to do with equality and some sort of pride bullshit. You and your skin colour have no advantage over any other person and you're finding that difficult to accept.
Take it slowly, read some books.
Trapper John wrote:We often hear this statement/phrase or a version of it, coined by politicians or the media more often than not when an issue arises connected to the invasion of our land by mass legions of foreigners from around the world.
Seeing it used in a thread the other day by arch 5th columnist CannyDC, a Dogs member who quite unashamedly has stated on numerous occasions that he wants to live in a world, this country included, inhabited only by 'coffee coloured people' originating from the four corners of the globe.
So I wondered when this phrase was first uttered and in what context and also whether there were any facts available to back this sweeping statement up.
I lucked out on the origination question, lack of an exact wording and usages in many different formats by equally as many different people, make this an almost impossible task. What I can say is, I doubt it was uttered by anyone with first hand experience of what this supposed 'tolerance' entails and it's effects.
So I looked for examples of what might have given anyone reason to believe this statement was/is a traditional reflection of 'Britishness' as it's often lauded. The best place to start I thought would be back in recorded history, as we're talking about tradition. So I looked for some historical examples of where mass movements of foreigners to our shores occurred, surely I'd find the proof there.
Romans?, Saxons and other Germanic tribes?, Vikings?, Normans? - Nope, no luck there. In fact all of these occupations of our land were met with continued violence and aggression, not a welcome or bit of tolerance to be had.
It was a similar story later in history, when attempts were made by the Spanish and French and much later, by Nazi Germany. I couldn't find any reference to welcoming them with 'Great British tolerance and understanding' either, it seems that the threat of being overwhelmed by foreign invaders has quite the opposite affect, at least that's what history tells us.
Now I've reached a conclusion but I can't put it on this page. You see we have many readers of Dog's threads who can only absorb information in bite sized pieces. I do try to accommodate them by breaking up my posts with paragraphs instead of a block posting and using my own words rather than C&P huge globs of other peoples work.
Unfortunately this isn't always enough, when faced with a post which fills a page, they become disorientated and cannot cope with the enormity of the task facing them, so more often than not they hide their weaknesses and inabilities by posting TL;DR, yet often will still comment on the content – how is that?
Anyway, being the helpful and accommodating chap that I am, my conclusion appears on the following page.
Red Okktober wrote:Stooo wrote:It's got everything to do with equality and some sort of pride bullshit. You and your skin colour have no advantage over any other person and you're finding that difficult to accept.
Take it slowly, read some books.
It's got no more to do with skin colour than it does with equality.
I'd no more want us to be overrun with Australian christians as I would Iraqi muslims.
The difference being, that Australians haven't turned their own country into a violent festering cesspit, and have no reason to flee from it and try and do the same to ours.
So is skin colour a major factor in being tolerant then? Do you only tolerate ethnics? Only you don't seem to be very tolerant of all those whiteys who voted for Brexit and Trump.
Red Okktober wrote:Stooo wrote:Why do you have a problem with equality?
What (god forbid) if the donor for the failing piece of granite that you call a heart was a gay, Islamic Nigerian and you had knowledge of it before the op?
It's got nothing to do with equality - do you think it has?
It's about common sense. You can't just let everyone into this country who wants to come here, just so you can be seen as being tolerant. You can't just let the growth of a vile insidious culture (islam) go unchecked, just so you can be seen as being tolerant.
You're pressing the self-destruct button on behalf of everyone else. Because we haven't self-destructed yet, doesn't mean it's ok to carry on tolerating things that are harmful to us.
If you truly believed in equality, you'd be respecting the votes of the people who voted for Brexit and Trump, instead of referring to them as idiots at every opportunity. Like I said, liberals are the least tolerant group of people you could ever meet - 'ban this' 'close this down' 'censor that' etc.
Return to The Sleeping Dogs' Arms
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests