guest wrote:Avon Barksdale wrote:The punishment is disproportionate to the crime in my opinion.
However, it was a pretty silly thing behaviour as it's not exactly a secret that if you hold certain jobs / positions you are expected to maintain specified public standards of conduct which this lady has clearly failed to do. A warning would have been enough though.
She was a serial offender so the punishment was correct
Avon Barksdale wrote:guest wrote:Avon Barksdale wrote:The punishment is disproportionate to the crime in my opinion.
However, it was a pretty silly thing behaviour as it's not exactly a secret that if you hold certain jobs / positions you are expected to maintain specified public standards of conduct which this lady has clearly failed to do. A warning would have been enough though.
She was a serial offender so the punishment was correct
Was there evidence that her private views influenced or was detrimental to her public work?
If not it should be a matter of individual conscience.
McAz wrote:Avon Barksdale wrote:guest wrote:Avon Barksdale wrote:The punishment is disproportionate to the crime in my opinion.
However, it was a pretty silly thing behaviour as it's not exactly a secret that if you hold certain jobs / positions you are expected to maintain specified public standards of conduct which this lady has clearly failed to do. A warning would have been enough though.
She was a serial offender so the punishment was correct
Was there evidence that her private views influenced or was detrimental to her public work?
If not it should be a matter of individual conscience.
Yes - she published them causing mistrust in the impartiality of the police.
McAz wrote:Markey mark wrote:Every police man, woman is going to have a opinion, but going public with your opinion your heading for trouble, especially with the political correct police force ,
Way before the internet a senior copper told be that their favoured solution to football violence would be to lock the opposing gangs inside the ground to get on with it and then pick up what was left of them later. Reduces the problem and saves public money. Imagine the outcry today?
Avon Barksdale wrote:McAz wrote:Avon Barksdale wrote:guest wrote:Avon Barksdale wrote:The punishment is disproportionate to the crime in my opinion.
However, it was a pretty silly thing behaviour as it's not exactly a secret that if you hold certain jobs / positions you are expected to maintain specified public standards of conduct which this lady has clearly failed to do. A warning would have been enough though.
She was a serial offender so the punishment was correct
Was there evidence that her private views influenced or was detrimental to her public work?
If not it should be a matter of individual conscience.
Yes - she published them causing mistrust in the impartiality of the police.
I thought the account was her own and not a public one?
In addition, shouldn't we give people a chance to atone for their mistakes or amend their ways before taking away their livelihood? If we all got booted out of our jobs for saying idiotic things on social media unemployment would rocket.
Avon Barksdale wrote:McAz wrote:Avon Barksdale wrote:guest wrote:Avon Barksdale wrote:The punishment is disproportionate to the crime in my opinion.
However, it was a pretty silly thing behaviour as it's not exactly a secret that if you hold certain jobs / positions you are expected to maintain specified public standards of conduct which this lady has clearly failed to do. A warning would have been enough though.
She was a serial offender so the punishment was correct
Was there evidence that her private views influenced or was detrimental to her public work?
If not it should be a matter of individual conscience.
Yes - she published them causing mistrust in the impartiality of the police.
I thought the account was her own and not a public one?
In addition, shouldn't we give people a chance to atone for their mistakes or amend their ways before taking away their livelihood? If we all got booted out of our jobs for saying idiotic things on social media unemployment would rocket.
Avon Barksdale wrote:The punishment is disproportionate to the crime in my opinion.
However, it was a pretty silly thing behaviour as it's not exactly a secret that if you hold certain jobs / positions you are expected to maintain specified public standards of conduct which this lady has clearly failed to do. A warning would have been enough though.
Rolluplostinspace wrote:McAz wrote:Markey mark wrote:Every police man, woman is going to have a opinion, but going public with your opinion your heading for trouble, especially with the political correct police force ,
Way before the internet a senior copper told be that their favoured solution to football violence would be to lock the opposing gangs inside the ground to get on with it and then pick up what was left of them later. Reduces the problem and saves public money. Imagine the outcry today?
Back in the eighties Manchester had a very outspoken chief of police ...James Anderton.
He said instead of policing rough housing estates the estates should be fenced in and the people left to police themselves.
A guarded entrance exit would suffice.
No emergency services to ever go in these places.
Rolluplostinspace wrote:A window cleaner doesn't have to appear impartial a copper does.
McAz wrote:
She contravened her conditions of service - that's always stupid if you want to keep your job.
Avon Barksdale wrote:McAz wrote:
She contravened her conditions of service - that's always stupid if you want to keep your job.
Yep, not arguing against that.
It was a silly thing to do undoubtedly.
Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests