Maddog wrote:Rockstar wrote:Maddog wrote:Saddam was no more of a piece of shit in 2003 than he had been in the past. The powers that be wanted a good excuse for regime change and used 911 for an excuse.
Of course, Saddam's taunting of the UN didn't help. The US did use those violations of UN resolutions to justify the invasion.
Thanks for confirming that your laughable post about USA wanting to remove Saddam for the betterment of the Iraqis was a load of tosh.
Once you start eliminating all the possible reasons,you will arrive at "Imperialism" at its core.
Doubtful. But what I will find is that you're not changing your mind.
Like I said I am not offering you any leeway...If "betterment of Iraqis" was the goal,there was no reason to cook up stories linking Saddam with Al Qaeda,Wmds,using 9/11 as an excuse as you put it yourself..
You also mentioned Saddam in 2003 was as bad as Saddam in previous years. What changed in 2000-03 was that Iraq shifted payments to euro from dollar.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... aq.theeuroOT : Are you Donald Trump's advisor or is he reading this forum? It is bizarre for him to allegedly mention "shithole countries" just a couple of days after you said the same thing in a different context... Are you Steve Bannon in disguise??