NastyNickers wrote:She’s a patronising bugger. It’s the whole stating her opinions as if they are facts, and then ignoring anything that may trip her up. Arrogant.
asayousay is the undisputed queen of presenting opinion as fact ..
NastyNickers wrote:She’s a patronising bugger. It’s the whole stating her opinions as if they are facts, and then ignoring anything that may trip her up. Arrogant.
measurer wrote:Anais - did you say had told you she was a prison officer, or that she told you she is a psychologist working with prisoners? This woman is starting to sound like someone I knew..
measurer wrote:Anais - did you say had told you she was a prison officer, or that she told you she is a psychologist working with prisoners? This woman is starting to sound like someone I knew..
Anais32 - "I do work in the sector but not as a lawyer. I work in prisons and youth justice in a more academic rather than professional capacity."
dis wrote:measurer wrote:Anais - did you say had told you she was a prison officer, or that she told you she is a psychologist working with prisoners? This woman is starting to sound like someone I knew..
I think so, I haven't read the whole thread. I think she might be in MI5 too, by the sounds of it.
TWATkins wrote:NastyNickers wrote:She’s a patronising bugger. It’s the whole stating her opinions as if they are facts, and then ignoring anything that may trip her up. Arrogant.
asayousay is the undisputed queen of presenting opinion as fact ..
Dean wrote:Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Dean wrote:
I don’t ever remember posting with her on DS...
OooooooooooooOh burn!
That's got to hurt...
Are you under the impression we were old friends or something?
guest wrote:measurer wrote:Anais - did you say had told you she was a prison officer, or that she told you she is a psychologist working with prisoners? This woman is starting to sound like someone I knew..Anais32 - "I do work in the sector but not as a lawyer. I work in prisons and youth justice in a more academic rather than professional capacity."
https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... rently/p51
dis wrote:measurer wrote:Anais - did you say had told you she was a prison officer, or that she told you she is a psychologist working with prisoners? This woman is starting to sound like someone I knew..
I think so, I haven't read the whole thread. I think she might be in MI5 too, by the sounds of it.
NastyNickers wrote:TWATkins wrote:NastyNickers wrote:She’s a patronising bugger. It’s the whole stating her opinions as if they are facts, and then ignoring anything that may trip her up. Arrogant.
asayousay is the undisputed queen of presenting opinion as fact ..
Asyousay is a fucking idiot too.
Cleopatra wrote:dis wrote:measurer wrote:Anais - did you say had told you she was a prison officer, or that she told you she is a psychologist working with prisoners? This woman is starting to sound like someone I knew..
I think so, I haven't read the whole thread. I think she might be in MI5 too, by the sounds of it.
There are various levels of security vetting. From the basic DBS to enhanced clearance/developed vetting. If you have regular access to government/official figures or access to sensitive information it will be the DV. If the person in question is working in a prison and has the DV clearance then she is more than a basic prison officer.
TWATkins wrote:NastyNickers wrote:She’s a patronising bugger. It’s the whole stating her opinions as if they are facts, and then ignoring anything that may trip her up. Arrogant.
asayousay is the undisputed queen of presenting opinion as fact ..
Goodwife wrote:Cleopatra wrote:dis wrote:measurer wrote:Anais - did you say had told you she was a prison officer, or that she told you she is a psychologist working with prisoners? This woman is starting to sound like someone I knew..
I think so, I haven't read the whole thread. I think she might be in MI5 too, by the sounds of it.
There are various levels of security vetting. From the basic DBS to enhanced clearance/developed vetting. If you have regular access to government/official figures or access to sensitive information it will be the DV. If the person in question is working in a prison and has the DV clearance then she is more than a basic prison officer.
Which from my brief googling is not a counter terrorism check.
https://www.securityclearedjobs.com/sta ... y-cleared/
guest wrote:measurer wrote:Anais - did you say had told you she was a prison officer, or that she told you she is a psychologist working with prisoners? This woman is starting to sound like someone I knew..Anais32 - "I do work in the sector but not as a lawyer. I work in prisons and youth justice in a more academic rather than professional capacity."
https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... rently/p51
Cleopatra wrote:Goodwife wrote:Cleopatra wrote:dis wrote:measurer wrote:Anais - did you say had told you she was a prison officer, or that she told you she is a psychologist working with prisoners? This woman is starting to sound like someone I knew..
I think so, I haven't read the whole thread. I think she might be in MI5 too, by the sounds of it.
There are various levels of security vetting. From the basic DBS to enhanced clearance/developed vetting. If you have regular access to government/official figures or access to sensitive information it will be the DV. If the person in question is working in a prison and has the DV clearance then she is more than a basic prison officer.
Which from my brief googling is not a counter terrorism check.
https://www.securityclearedjobs.com/sta ... y-cleared/
I don't need to google it. If you have DV then you also have CTC
Developed Vetting (DV) is the highest level of Security Clearance and is required for people with substantial unsupervised access to TOP SECRET assets, or for those working in the Intelligence or Security agencies.
Cleopatra wrote:Goodwife wrote:Cleopatra wrote:dis wrote:measurer wrote:Anais - did you say had told you she was a prison officer, or that she told you she is a psychologist working with prisoners? This woman is starting to sound like someone I knew..
I think so, I haven't read the whole thread. I think she might be in MI5 too, by the sounds of it.
There are various levels of security vetting. From the basic DBS to enhanced clearance/developed vetting. If you have regular access to government/official figures or access to sensitive information it will be the DV. If the person in question is working in a prison and has the DV clearance then she is more than a basic prison officer.
Which from my brief googling is not a counter terrorism check.
https://www.securityclearedjobs.com/sta ... y-cleared/
I don't need to google it. If you have DV then you also have CTC
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests