DS thread # 92

Big Threads

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Guest » Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:01 pm

Gigabit wrote:I apologised on DS if I upset anyone. I did not apologise “constantly” and I certainly won’t be apologising for having a different point of view. I won’t apologise for trolling or baiting on DS as I never did, not once. Unlike Wizzy and co who did constantly. What you call trolling I call criticising. For example posting bollocks and then me questioning it is not trolling. It is how arguments work. But that’s the problem with you Trifles, you don’t want a debate. You enjoy actually trolling and detailing threads.

You never baited.? Liar what were you banned for then?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby McAz » Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:01 pm

Holly wrote:
McAz wrote:
Holly wrote:McAz, why do you even involve yourself in this 'womanly" conversation? Go play with your little gherkin, your alter ego :mrgreen:

Canny is my friend.



Awwww, that's nice :smilin:

It is? :wubbers:
User avatar
McAz
 
Posts: 30453
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:57 am

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Holly » Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:07 pm

McAz wrote:
HobbitFeet wrote:
McAz wrote:
So do, for example, the rampant homophobic slurs etc on here - but who gives a fuck?



I'm not really following this whole conversation

why shouldn't people point out if they find something hurtful?
what new rules are there?

pointing out that something bothers you or pisses you off does not equate to wanting to stop it being said or for the post to be removed , it's just your right to voice an opinion on a post

So it wasn't an Admin instruction to stop talking about "womanliness", it was simply a comment by an Admin. Clearly, I misunderstood - but how are we supposed to know the difference?



Yes, I requested that this twisting of the word stops. It was never said in Vam's OP....Now stop this shit!
User avatar
Holly
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6398
Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 4:25 pm
Location: Middle-earth

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby jra » Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:09 pm

HobbitFeet wrote:
jra wrote:
Guest wrote:
jra wrote:
Guest wrote:In your boring life maybe.


Was that called for? No. So fuck off. You know sod all about my life.


You seem to spend much of your time in the pub, paying for female company and torturing animal.

Nice.


Torturing animals now. How low are you willing to stoop?

ETA. Another serious accusation which has been screen grabbed in case it needs to be used as evidence.


are you implying some form of action against this site?


Nope.
User avatar
jra
 
Posts: 12325
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 10:02 pm

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby McAz » Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:09 pm

Has Hobs been struck dumb?
User avatar
McAz
 
Posts: 30453
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:57 am

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Puzzler » Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:12 pm

Guest wrote:
Dean wrote:
Guest wrote:Isn't a miscarriage the loss of a child? Perhaps we should all be upping the ante and sneering at those who have lost children too like Canary does :shake head:


We? You’re just a cowardly guest...

And you’re a big brave boy because your posts say Dean next to them instead of Guest.

:laughing:
User avatar
Puzzler
 
Posts: 6954
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:07 pm
Location: A brave new world

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby HobbitFeet » Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:13 pm

McAz wrote:
HobbitFeet wrote:
McAz wrote:
So do, for example, the rampant homophobic slurs etc on here - but who gives a fuck?



I'm not really following this whole conversation

why shouldn't people point out if they find something hurtful?
what new rules are there?

pointing out that something bothers you or pisses you off does not equate to wanting to stop it being said or for the post to be removed , it's just your right to voice an opinion on a post

So it wasn't an Admin instruction to stop talking about "womanliness", it was simply a comment by an Admin. Clearly, I misunderstood - but how are we supposed to know the difference?



you don't need to know the difference, if Admin asks nicely for something to stop it means that in that moment they want it to stop (for whatever reason) that doesn't mean that there is a new rule banning that word from ever being used again - if that ever happens I am sure it will be clearly explained

but you know this
User avatar
HobbitFeet
Site Admin
 
Posts: 7364
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 2:29 pm

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Jilly » Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:13 pm

Guest wrote:
Gigabit wrote:I apologised on DS if I upset anyone. I did not apologise “constantly” and I certainly won’t be apologising for having a different point of view. I won’t apologise for trolling or baiting on DS as I never did, not once. Unlike Wizzy and co who did constantly. What you call trolling I call criticising. For example posting bollocks and then me questioning it is not trolling. It is how arguments work. But that’s the problem with you Trifles, you don’t want a debate. You enjoy actually trolling and detailing threads.

You never baited.? Liar what were you banned for then?


He did exactly that.
User avatar
Jilly
 
Posts: 242
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2018 11:03 am

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Puzzler » Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:14 pm

McAz wrote:
So do, for example, the rampant homophobic slurs etc on here - but who gives a fuck?

Yet you ignore the anti disabled slurs the stinking fat troll uses on a daily basis.
User avatar
Puzzler
 
Posts: 6954
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:07 pm
Location: A brave new world

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby HobbitFeet » Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:14 pm

McAz wrote:Has Hobs been struck dumb?



no, unlike you I don't have my snout constantly in the trough

I was preparing PSB if you really must know
User avatar
HobbitFeet
Site Admin
 
Posts: 7364
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 2:29 pm

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby McAz » Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:15 pm

HobbitFeet wrote:
McAz wrote:
HobbitFeet wrote:
McAz wrote:
So do, for example, the rampant homophobic slurs etc on here - but who gives a fuck?



I'm not really following this whole conversation

why shouldn't people point out if they find something hurtful?
what new rules are there?

pointing out that something bothers you or pisses you off does not equate to wanting to stop it being said or for the post to be removed , it's just your right to voice an opinion on a post

So it wasn't an Admin instruction to stop talking about "womanliness", it was simply a comment by an Admin. Clearly, I misunderstood - but how are we supposed to know the difference?



you don't need to know the difference, if Admin asks nicely for something to stop it means that in that moment they want it to stop (for whatever reason) that doesn't mean that there is a new rule banning that word from ever being used again - if that ever happens I am sure it will be clearly explained

but you know this

My point exactly, there is no difference. But thanks for the clarification.
User avatar
McAz
 
Posts: 30453
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:57 am

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Guest » Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:15 pm

McAz wrote:Has Hobs been struck dumb?


why are you still meddling in all this, haven't your friends Canary and Dean already caused enough trouble? :dafinger:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby jra » Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:16 pm

Guest wrote:Evidence? What for?

You state you enjoy fishing jra. Well shoving a sharp metal hook through its mouth, fighting it till the point of exhaustion, dragging it out of its natural environment so it can't breath, sounds like animal torture to me.


Oh that's what the poster was alluding to. Do you eat fish yourself? If you do, I doubt the fish are that cool about being crushed in a fishing net and then suffocated when they are hauled on board. It's unproven as of yet whether fish feel pain when being hooked.

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=do+fi ... e&ie=UTF-8
Last edited by jra on Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:19 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
jra
 
Posts: 12325
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 10:02 pm

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Dean » Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:17 pm

Puzzler wrote:
McAz wrote:
So do, for example, the rampant homophobic slurs etc on here - but who gives a fuck?

Yet you ignore the anti disabled slurs the stinking fat troll uses on a daily basis.


No one asked you, spastic...
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 34859
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:02 pm

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Puzzler » Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:18 pm

Guest wrote:
McAz wrote:Has Hobs been struck dumb?


why are you still meddling in all this, haven't your friends Canary and Dean already caused enough trouble? :dafinger:

He doesn’t care. Him and Dean are such brave lads they probably beat people in wheelchairs up.
User avatar
Puzzler
 
Posts: 6954
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:07 pm
Location: A brave new world

PreviousNext

Return to The Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest