NastyNickers wrote:Goodwife wrote:
What am I supposed to be following through with?
Your threat. You bottled it and made bullshit excuses.
What threat was that?
NastyNickers wrote:Goodwife wrote:
What am I supposed to be following through with?
Your threat. You bottled it and made bullshit excuses.
Vam wrote:Trapper John wrote:Vam wrote:Vicks wrote:Dean wrote:Does anybody buy the metadata/Royal family pics story? Anybody?
I certainly don't.
With that snide bitch? Me neither. No way.
Apart from how she behaves on here, her DS rep precedes her.
We definitely have another Snuffs in the house, imo......
Excuse me if I don't take your word for it, you're hardly 'Miss Impartiality' are you now.
Your prerogative, of course
[b]I do have an uncanny knack of spotting a wrong'un on sight, though. And I'm eventually proved right time after time..[/b].
HobbitFeet wrote:Rockstar wrote:Where was the foutrage over checking exif data of pics that Micki posted?
I wasn't admin then and as I kept out of the Micky stuff I don't really have any recollection of how it went down
after puzzler asking for info to dox me from people who were proper into it all I take it seriously, not for effect but because I know how vulnerable it can make you feel
Rockstar wrote:HobbitFeet wrote:Rockstar wrote:Where was the foutrage over checking exif data of pics that Micki posted?
I wasn't admin then and as I kept out of the Micky stuff I don't really have any recollection of how it went down
after puzzler asking for info to dox me from people who were proper into it all I take it seriously, not for effect but because I know how vulnerable it can make you feel
Doxing is a complete different ball game to exif data.
Like I could post a generic picture of Switzerland and claim that it was taken by me. Now some skeptics may choose to validate my post by checking the exif data or doing a reverse image search on the image. It doesn't lead to doxing...
Trapper John wrote:Vam wrote:Trapper John wrote:Excuse me if I don't take your word for it, you're hardly 'Miss Impartiality' are you now.
Your prerogative, of course
[b]I do have an uncanny knack of spotting a wrong'un on sight, though. And I'm eventually proved right time after time..[/b].
TBF you can't lose, everyone is a 'wrong'un' to you.
Vicks wrote:Trapper John wrote:
That was funny though.
I hope someone does it to one of your precious 'Daughters'
You Cunt.
Junglejayne wrote:Trapper John wrote:Vam wrote:Trapper John wrote:Excuse me if I don't take your word for it, you're hardly 'Miss Impartiality' are you now.
Your prerogative, of course
[b]I do have an uncanny knack of spotting a wrong'un on sight, though. And I'm eventually proved right time after time..[/b].
TBF you can't lose, everyone is a 'wrong'un' to you.
And if they weren't when she started she'll bait and poke until they are.
Rockstar wrote:Get a room FFS....
Rockstar wrote:HobbitFeet wrote:Rockstar wrote:Where was the foutrage over checking exif data of pics that Micki posted?
I wasn't admin then and as I kept out of the Micky stuff I don't really have any recollection of how it went down
after puzzler asking for info to dox me from people who were proper into it all I take it seriously, not for effect but because I know how vulnerable it can make you feel
Doxing is a complete different ball game to exif data.
Like I could post a generic picture of Switzerland and claim that it was taken by me. Now some skeptics may choose to validate my post by checking the exif data or doing a reverse image search on the image. It doesn't lead to doxing...
NastyNickers wrote:Exif gives precise GPS location.
That photo was taken at Rochdale infirmary, but had it been taken at home then yes you’d have my address.
NastyNickers wrote:Exif gives precise GPS location.
That photo was taken at Rochdale infirmary, but had it been taken at home then yes you’d have my address.
Junglejayne wrote:NastyNickers wrote:Exif gives precise GPS location.
That photo was taken at Rochdale infirmary, but had it been taken at home then yes you’d have my address.
How can it be so precise? I'm going to have to check this out on some pics I've taken now, what do I need to do to get this data?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests