Snookerballs wrote:It has now been ascertained at the Inquiry that the Hotpoint Fridge/Freezer involved was purchased a few years previous as Brand New .
The tenant of the flat where the fire started has been cleared of any wrong doing, he did not walk out with a suitcase as some of the news media suggested, he called the fire brigade and then left the flat and stayed in the Carpark evacuation area for his safety.
He is now under witness protection due to harrassment by the press
Snookerballs wrote:The Inquiry now needs to clear the Emergency Telephone operators instead of blaming them for their procedure, they were working blind unaware of the situation,
Standard advice is that if it is not safe to exit the building go into one room shut the door open a window, block any gaps to stop smoke getting into the room, and await for help.
Do not go out into Toxic Smoke Filled Hallways , Corridors or stairways it is very easy to get dis orientated .
The Inquiry is trying to place a lot of the blame on the Fire Service, despite the fact that over the last few years 13 Fire Stations in London have closed down , crews of Fire Engines have been reduced to four firefighters instead of five ( A disaster waiting to happen and it has )
Snookerballs wrote:It is how the News media is reporting the Inquiry and proportioning the blame, it undermines the advice given thus creating a further hazard to life to the public.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/6417293/grenfell-tower-report-london-fire-brigade-blair-cladding/
Lady Murasaki wrote:It’s so obvious the problem was the cheap cladding. As well as other fire safety regs being flouted.
Snookerballs wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:It’s so obvious the problem was the cheap cladding. As well as other fire safety regs being flouted.
That type of cladding was banned for interior use, so what did the contractors do == Stuck it on the outside of the building
Lady Murasaki wrote:It’s so obvious the problem was the cheap cladding. As well as other fire safety regs being flouted.
Cannydc wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:It’s so obvious the problem was the cheap cladding. As well as other fire safety regs being flouted.
How about the failure of the fire service to evacuate the building ?
The fire doors that only lasted half the advertised time when tested ?
It will all be in the report.
Cannydc wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:It’s so obvious the problem was the cheap cladding. As well as other fire safety regs being flouted.
How about the failure of the fire service to evacuate the building ?
The fire doors that only lasted half the advertised time when tested ?
It will all be in the report.
Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests