Snookerballs wrote:And how did they manage that wearing Jeans and a Gillet when clean up and decontamination required Breathing Apparatus and specialist decontamination clothing
MungoBrush wrote:Rolluplostinspace wrote:LordRaven wrote:Fletch wrote:The Strange Russian Alibi
Like many, my first thought at the interview of Boshirov and Petrov – which apparently are indeed their names – is that they were very unconvincing. The interview itself seemed to be set up around a cramped table with a poor camera and lighting, and the interviewer seemed pretty hopeless at asking probing questions that would shed any real light.
I had in fact decided that their story was highly improbable, until I started seeing the storm of twitter posting, much of it from mainstream media journalists, which stated that individual things were impossible which were, in fact, not impossible at all.
The first and most obvious regards the weather on 3 and 4 March. It is in fact absolutely true that, if the two had gone down to Salisbury on 3 March with the intention of going to Stonehenge, they would have been unable to get there because of the snow. It is therefore perfectly possible that they went back the next day to try again; and public transport out of Salisbury was still severely disrupted, and many roads closed, on 4 March. Proof of this is not at all difficult to find.
-
-
-
In general it is worth observing that the Skripals, and poor Dawn Sturgess and Charlie Rowley, all managed to achieve almost complete CCTV invisibility in their widespread movements around Salisbury at the key times, while in contrast “Petrov and Boshirov” managed to be frequently caught in high quality all the time during their brief visit.
This is especially remarkable in the case of the Skripals’ location around noon on 4 March. The government can only maintain that they returned home at this time, as they insist they got the nerve agent from the doorknob. But why was their car so frequently caught on CCTV leaving, but not at all returning? It appears very much more probable that they came into contact with the nerve agent somewhere else, while they were out.
I shall write a further post on these timing questions shortly.
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives ... ian-alibi/
Wow! We await with baited breath
I think you should check out who Craig Murray is Lordy before making a fool of yourself.
Meanwhile just obey orders and don't question anything as you have been trained to do.
I think it's worthwhile reviewing their timeline
1. They fly from Moscow to Gatwick (a 5 hour flight) and arrive 3pm Friday and get to their London hotel 6pm
2. On Saturday, they get a late morning train to Salisbury and 90 minutes later they are back on the train to London
3. On Sunday, they catch the same train to Salisbury, and less than 2 hours later they are back on the London train
4. On Sunday at 6:30pm they get the train to Heathrow and catch a plane back to Moscow.
Raggamuffin wrote:Hmmm, all that way just to go to Salisbury/Stonehenge.
Raggamuffin wrote:Snookerballs wrote:And how did they manage that wearing Jeans and a Gillet when clean up and decontamination required Breathing Apparatus and specialist decontamination clothing
Well someone managed it without all that apparatus.
I'm still not convinced it would take so long for the poison to work though.
Raggamuffin wrote:MungoBrush wrote:Rolluplostinspace wrote:LordRaven wrote:Fletch wrote:The Strange Russian Alibi
Like many, my first thought at the interview of Boshirov and Petrov – which apparently are indeed their names – is that they were very unconvincing. The interview itself seemed to be set up around a cramped table with a poor camera and lighting, and the interviewer seemed pretty hopeless at asking probing questions that would shed any real light.
I had in fact decided that their story was highly improbable, until I started seeing the storm of twitter posting, much of it from mainstream media journalists, which stated that individual things were impossible which were, in fact, not impossible at all.
The first and most obvious regards the weather on 3 and 4 March. It is in fact absolutely true that, if the two had gone down to Salisbury on 3 March with the intention of going to Stonehenge, they would have been unable to get there because of the snow. It is therefore perfectly possible that they went back the next day to try again; and public transport out of Salisbury was still severely disrupted, and many roads closed, on 4 March. Proof of this is not at all difficult to find.
-
-
-
In general it is worth observing that the Skripals, and poor Dawn Sturgess and Charlie Rowley, all managed to achieve almost complete CCTV invisibility in their widespread movements around Salisbury at the key times, while in contrast “Petrov and Boshirov” managed to be frequently caught in high quality all the time during their brief visit.
This is especially remarkable in the case of the Skripals’ location around noon on 4 March. The government can only maintain that they returned home at this time, as they insist they got the nerve agent from the doorknob. But why was their car so frequently caught on CCTV leaving, but not at all returning? It appears very much more probable that they came into contact with the nerve agent somewhere else, while they were out.
I shall write a further post on these timing questions shortly.
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives ... ian-alibi/
Wow! We await with baited breath
I think you should check out who Craig Murray is Lordy before making a fool of yourself.
Meanwhile just obey orders and don't question anything as you have been trained to do.
I think it's worthwhile reviewing their timeline
1. They fly from Moscow to Gatwick (a 5 hour flight) and arrive 3pm Friday and get to their London hotel 6pm
2. On Saturday, they get a late morning train to Salisbury and 90 minutes later they are back on the train to London
3. On Sunday, they catch the same train to Salisbury, and less than 2 hours later they are back on the London train
4. On Sunday at 6:30pm they get the train to Heathrow and catch a plane back to Moscow.
Hmmm, all that way just to go to Salisbury/Stonehenge.
Fletch wrote:Outside of this country, Salisbury and Stonehenge are major attractions with many international visitors.
Fletch wrote:ountry, Salisbury and Stonehenge are major attractions with many international visitors.
Rolluplostinspace wrote:I forgot to mention all the evidence would include the Skripals attending as witnesses and medical records from the hospitals.
It was mentioned some time ago that the hospital might have treated the Skripals for Fentanyl poisoning nog nerve agent poisoning.
All the cctv of the Skrips and the Russians to be viewed in court and explained timelines the lot.
I think the British government would go into panic mode.
Come on Putin bring it on .... he does still read here yes?
Raggamuffin wrote:I don't quite understand the route these chaps allegedly followed. They were allegedly caught on CCTV near the house, and then somewhere else on their way back to the station. However, it wasn't on their way back to the station. Did they go to Queen Elizabeth gardens specifically to dispose of the bottle? Also, if they were wandering around the suburbs of Salisbury, I doubt they were there sightseeing.
Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests