Cannydc wrote:Why hasn't this featured in the western msm?
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/do ... 27116.html
They covered it.
However, according to the same OPCW report, it is likely that chemical weapons WERE used at Douma !!
The OPCW report said that there were “reasonable grounds that the use of a toxic chemical as a weapon has taken place on 7 April 2018. This toxic chemical contained reactive chlorine”.
But it said that it found no evidence of the use of nerve agents in Douma, which had been previously alleged by some parties in the conflict.
It is noted that the Twitter etc. from Tucker Carlson mentions CHEMICAL weapons, which OPCW say probably WERE used,
Someone's getting confused here. Chlorine is a WMD, just like any nerve agent.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/ ... chdog-says
(Note, both quotes taken from MSM, which you claim ignores the subject. More bollocks)
The Independent article by Robert Fisk....who you claim to part of the CTers when his articles appear on Information Clearing House or Global Research...
As for the Guardian link. Sat 2 Mar 2019 01.42 GMT.
Independent article by Robert Fisk. 3 days ago
Until now. For in the last few days, there has emerged disturbing evidence that in its final report on the alleged use of chemical weapons by the Syrian regime in the city of Douma last year, the OPCW deliberately concealed from both the public and the press the existence of a dissenting 15-page assessment of two cylinders which had supposedly contained molecular chlorine – perhaps the most damning evidence against the Assad regime in the entire report.
The OPCW officially maintains that these canisters were probably dropped by an aircraft – probably a helicopter, presumably Syrian – over Douma on 7 April 2018. But the dissenting assessment, which the OPCW made no reference to in its published conclusions, finds there is a “higher probability that both cylinders were manually placed at those two locations rather than being delivered from aircraft”.
It is difficult to underestimate the seriousness of this manipulative act by the OPCW. In a response to the conservative author Peter Hitchens, who also writes for the Mail on Sunday – he is of course the brother of the late Christopher Hitchens – the OPCW admits that its so-called technical secretariat “is conducting an internal investigation about the unauthorised [sic] release of the document”.
The west lied, the media lied and the OPCW got caught out hiding evidence for the benefit of the west (US)