Fletch wrote:You're the single most uninformed poster this forum has ever had raven.
He isn't, Fletch.
Thinking when you are informed, when your information is highly likely to be BS means you are probably well up there.
Fletch wrote:You're the single most uninformed poster this forum has ever had raven.
Fletch wrote:You're the single most uninformed poster this forum has ever had raven.
Cannydc wrote:Just so everyone knows,
The World Socialist Web Site (WSWS) is an international socialist news site that is the online news and information publication of the International Committee of the Fourth International.
The International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI) is the name of two Trotskyist internationals; one with sections named Socialist Equality Party which publishes the World Socialist Web Site, and another linked to the Workers Revolutionary Party in the UK.
Not that Fletch's links could be accused of far-left (Russian?) bias, of course.
Cannydc wrote:Why do you need links for simple facts?
Smacks of paranoia, Fletch.
Fletch wrote:Cannydc wrote:Why do you need links for simple facts?
Smacks of paranoia, Fletch.
Copy pastes should have link to source canny. Always been the case in news and yet you always want to hide where yours come from or pretend it's all your own work. Even after Jack brought it up and you denied it only the other day, here you are doing it again!
The Arms is for trolling. Take it there.
Cannydc wrote:Fletch wrote:Cannydc wrote:Why do you need links for simple facts?
Smacks of paranoia, Fletch.
Copy pastes should have link to source canny. Always been the case in news and yet you always want to hide where yours come from or pretend it's all your own work. Even after Jack brought it up and you denied it only the other day, here you are doing it again!
The Arms is for trolling. Take it there.
Are you actually saying that that post is incorrect ?
It was actually a couple of sentences that were an amalgum of several sources. No-one would bother to look including you.
You are being pathetically defensive, as ever. How about answering the point that the judge has no direct links with defence, and would be pulled up by the defence on any perceived bias ?
Fletch wrote:Does that make it all untrue?
Is her husband not actually James Norwich Arbuthnot, a Conservative member of the House of Lords then?
is it all wrong about his history and connections?
Cannydc wrote:Her husband has nothing to do with the case, Fletch.
Sadly it's you who has allowed themselves to be diverted by another of your fave sites.
And if you think I am ever likely to comply with your 'orders' you are even more deluded than I thought.
In short, go fuck yourself.
Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests