Fletch wrote:Rolluplostinspace wrote:NastyNickers wrote:Stooo wrote:Rolluplostinspace wrote:So if the building fails without warning and to avoid people being killed in the streets everyone inside these buildings are collateral damage as the floors pancake on top of each other?
Buildings that collapse with a warning are a planned demolition.
These had planes flying into them and were designed to do a thing if a thing happened.
It happened.
They were hit pretty high up too. I don’t know why anyone would expect them to fall sideways.
There would have been massive structural damage at the point of impact. That weight from the upper floors will have pulverised the floors under it. Hence the pancaking. They weren’t built to absorb such downward forces.
Even the 911 commission had to admit the floors didn't pancake or the collapse would have been thud thud thud meaning much slower and is reckoned to have come to a stop about fifty floors tall.
There were no floors above the next floor up as can be clearly seen from the freefall speed which they come down at.
Freefall is not possible without removing stuff from the bottom up.
From my earlier link:
Ask yourself: Could the aircraft impacts and jet fuel fires really render the structures so feeble that they offered little more resistance than air? If common sense doesn’t provide the answer, do a little research and you’ll find that it couldn’t. And if it couldn’t, the whole official narrative falls apart as quickly as the buildings.
If, since 2001, you haven’t watched a video of the three towers (yes, three) coming down, do so again. Just watch. Really watch. Use your stopwatch if you like. Do some simple maths (the acceleration of gravity is 9.81 metres per second/per second).
Consider the structures – marvels of architectural engineering. Picture the thousands of tonnes of steel beams and girders that held those buildings up for decades. Watch those thousands of tonnes of steel beams and girders offering next to no resistance as the buildings come down, defying the laws of physics if the official explanation is to be believed – not once, but three times in one day.
There’s more, much more, and the implications are horrific. Just how horrific will be all too obvious when future generations marvel at how easily and eagerly so many were deceived.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/isaac-new ... st/5688656
What do people think that fucking big ball of fire was .... the curtains?
The fuel went up bang on impact.
Even if it hadn't there wasn't enough to do much damage to buildings that size!
The firemen got to the scene of impact and radiod back there were just a few office fires that they could bring under control quickly .... shown by the black smoke .... cool fire ....whit or blue smoke hot fire but no .... black smoke cool fire.