The Katie Price thead

[Guest]

Price has brought all this horrible nasty trolling of her unfortunate son upon him herself, she is responsible, anything for publicity, shoulda kept her legs shut in the first place.


She even got that stuttering young lad would be singer in her clutches, Gareth somebody

.

This is the most toxic tripe I have ever seen posted.
So it's Katie's fault Harvey is trolled in obscene ways by vile people. We will just excuse the people actually doing the bullying shall we, rightio.
She was wrong to even "open her legs" you say, so a woman is in the wrong for having sex but not the man. I'm not going to even comment on what turned out to be "her fault" for having sex because I don't trust your thought pattern's at all.
Lastly Gareth had no choice in bring intimate with her either did he. She was thought to be attractive at the time and he was not dragged kicking and screaming. Why are you blaming a woman for having sex ?? It is just in her case or all women? It's not an illegal act and why are the men deemed unable to consent in your post!

[George]

The bullying of Harvey is not the fault of Katie Price. It is the fault of the grown adults choosing to mock a disabled child.
If they dislike the woman to that extent they can target her alone.
Bullying is always the fault of the bully and there is no excuse for being abusive to a child no matter who their parents are.

Absolutely. I am not a particular fan of abusing anyone online, make criticisms, call them out on their nonsense, disagree etc is all fine but some of the really nasty stuff, like wishing death or physical harm or not acceptable imo

[Stooo]

Price has brought all this horrible nasty trolling of her unfortunate son upon him herself, she is responsible, anything for publicity, shoulda kept her legs shut in the first place.
She would easily win Crufts outright.

She even got that stuttering young lad would be singer in her clutches, Gareth somebody

She is among the most disreputable females in the media, if not number one.

I seen her on TV once talking about the size of her private part.

Disgusting tripe.

Good luck to Harvey, he needs it.

I'm seriously thinking about putting you on premod, your reckless comments are putting me in danger of a law suit in which I will gladly insist on providing the prosecution with your IPs and email address. Control yourself or don't bother.

[Stooo]

If anyone's ever wondered why I insist that members need to have a legally trackable IP when signing up? If I get a knock on the door then I'm going to leak like a fucked fridge, be in no question about that.

[Guest]

I absolutely agree that he should be off limits, and KP should've proceeded to prosecute them using the malicious communications act, NOT paraded him on tele for attention.

Why should he be ''off limits''? Why should Katie pretend he doesn't exist?
It's only natural for people to talk about their families. You've just talked about yours.

I didn't say she should pretend he doesn't exist.

He should be off-limits re trolling on Twitter, etc., not that she shouldn't ever talk about him.

The trolling of Harvey is awful. He gets it because of who his Mum is. None of her other kids get trolled like Harvey does. That just shows peoples level Also, his father being who he is, that keeps Harvey in the spotlight too.

I often wonder what goes though his head (DY) he should never have abandoned that boy , that shame is on him forever, he could have been a father to him regardless of Katie Price.
I've read he hasn't been in touch with the hospital or Harvey . I don't blame her for shaming him either, I'd do and have done similar in the past. We don't make these children ourselves.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/1 ... ke-harvey/

I agree, the bullying and horrible abuse he's getting on social media is horrific. How does that poor, harmless, sick boy deserve that?
I do blame Katie Price for it. To bring his illness out into the public to bring attention to his illness so people can understand is one thing, to constantly parade him around like he's some side show is another. She has a youtube channel where she keeps showing him off, I don't think it's right, that boy deserves privacy...as for his father, well he truly deserves public condemnation, he is a disgrace.

He deserves privacy yes. .but does he want it? You seem to want it for him. Getting out and about and interacting with people can only help with his development.
I think he enjoys being out with his Mum and it makes others uncomfortable to see him. That is the real issue . His size and illness are not pleasing to the eye, so people feel embarrassed.
Most kids rarely want privacy ,they prefer day trips and being out with their family. Harvey's no different.

[Bella]

Re above guest

I agree you, gone are the times where folks with learning disabilities etc are hidden by society.

[Holly]

Guest wrote:

He deserves privacy yes. .but does he want it? You seem to want it for him. Getting out and about and interacting with people can only help with his development.
I think he enjoys being out with his Mum and it makes others uncomfortable to see him. That is the real issue . His size and illness are not pleasing to the eye, so people feel embarrassed.
Most kids rarely want privacy ,they prefer day trips and being out with their family. Harvey's no different.

Getting out and about with his family and interacting with people is one thing, parading him around on TV is another. If he was my child and he keeps getting bullied, I would remove him from that situation.

[Guest]

Guest wrote:

He deserves privacy yes. .but does he want it? You seem to want it for him. Getting out and about and interacting with people can only help with his development.
I think he enjoys being out with his Mum and it makes others uncomfortable to see him. That is the real issue . His size and illness are not pleasing to the eye, so people feel embarrassed.
Most kids rarely want privacy ,they prefer day trips and being out with their family. Harvey's no different.

Getting out and about with his family and interacting with people is one thing, parading him around on TV is another. If he was my child and he keeps getting bullied, I would remove him from that situation.

The use of the word "parades" suggests you question KP's intention for taking Harvey on television. That is just your opinion, you have no way of knowing that. Even do it does not excuse the bullies or make her responsible in their place. In your post you stated you blamed her for the bullying and I think that's unfair.
Raising awareness about disability is a much needed and positive thing, many people are mildly to severely disabled but how many do you ever see on tele or in films? None. Or one or two here and there.

That's why Harvey receives the abuse he does. Because disabled children are having their deserved privacy i.e they are hidden away to protect them from a vicious society that chooses to hurt them. I understand how disgusting you think the bullying is but It's the bullies that need to change not forcing Harvey to be a recluse. He could be seen in a local park ,not on tv, and the abuse would be just the same.

[common sense]

The bullying of Harvey is not the fault of Katie Price. It is the fault of the grown adults choosing to mock a disabled child.
If they dislike the woman to that extent they can target her alone.
Bullying is always the fault of the bully and there is no excuse for being abusive to a child no matter who their parents are.

Absolutely. I am not a particular fan of abusing anyone online, make criticisms, call them out on their nonsense, disagree etc is all fine but some of the really nasty stuff, like wishing death or physical harm or not acceptable imo

Spot on. I don't particularly like or dislike Katie but the abuse of her son just isn't on.

[Major]

Price is not doing Harvey any favours by PUSHING him into the limelight.

[Snookerballs]

Price is not doing Harvey any favours by PUSHING him into the limelight.

Instead of venting your bile on Katie Price you should be condemning Harveys Father who has disowned his son and does not contribute to his upkeep .

Katie Price is now bankrupt but she is using the Media Publicity (as her job has always been a media celebrity) along with friends to ensure that Harvey has a decent style of life , if she did not publicise the problem no one would be aware of the condition .

[kaz]

Price is not doing Harvey any favours by PUSHING him into the limelight.

Instead of venting your bile on Katie Price you should be condemning Harveys Father who has disowned his son and does not contribute to his upkeep .

Katie Price is now bankrupt but she is using the Media Publicity (as her job has always been a media celebrity) along with friends to ensure that Harvey has a decent style of life , if she did not publicise the problem no one would be aware of the condition .

Except he didn't, KP refused all contact between Dwight and Harvey, then it was felt that Harvey's behaviour would deteriorate if they met. Dwight's paying maintenance as well.

[Text]

Price is not doing Harvey any favours by PUSHING him into the limelight.

Instead of venting your bile on Katie Price you should be condemning Harveys Father who has disowned his son and does not contribute to his upkeep .

Katie Price is now bankrupt but she is using the Media Publicity (as her job has always been a media celebrity) along with friends to ensure that Harvey has a decent style of life , if she did not publicise the problem no one would be aware of the condition .

Except he didn't, KP refused all contact between Dwight and Harvey, then it was felt that Harvey's behaviour would deteriorate if they met. Dwight's paying maintenance as well.

Yes that was my understanding too. Couple of times I saw him defend himself and say it was KP who refused access. Maybe the real truth lies between the two versions.

[Text]

I used to criticise her for being so attention seeking - and self destructive too. But when she started getting too much unfair criticism, I became a staunch supporter.

Did this conversion happen gradually or was it a road to Damascus turning point in your life?

Jog on!

[Text]

I absolutely agree that he should be off limits, and KP should've proceeded to prosecute them using the malicious communications act, NOT paraded him on tele for attention.

Why should he be ''off limits''? Why should Katie pretend he doesn't exist?
It's only natural for people to talk about their families. You've just talked about yours.

I didn't say she should pretend he doesn't exist.

He should be off-limits re trolling on Twitter, etc., not that she shouldn't ever talk about him.

Thank you for explaining that, Nucks. Appreciated! I like reading your posts, you are always so logical.
Even tho my opinion sometimes differs from yours, I still enjoy reading your own take on things, very much so.