Guest wrote:Tytonidae wrote:Guest wrote:Tytonidae wrote::pmsl: you're funny jack
...you guys focus in on this one aspect of my posting, ignoring everything else I might think or be, you yourself agree with me on DNA storage Bella and there have been other areas of agreement and I'm decent about care of the vulnerable, animals, the NHS, peoples problems...I'm not nasty or peevish or withholding and don't attack for no reason.....I'm niiice damn it
...give arguements why I should approve of a parasitic way of living, instead of attacking me personally - don't include transient claiming, or the genuine, stick to the leeches.......you can't can you, it's you who are the morons, advocating the waste of public money on the lazy and contriving and they are laughing at you....unless you are they!!
Why do you think there is no alternative to cuts?
If there were other measures, I'd still want the cuts, as living off the state is immoral and drags real people down - workers shouldn't have to witness dolescum and it's types like these whose lifestyle I want affected..they come in various forms but they all have in common a selfish, lazy, leeching, rather arrogant mentality;they know it, the government knows it, it's doing something about it thats the difficult part
Like the rich who cost us some TWENTY TIMES MORE than those you pillar????????????????????? Vodafone had their tax reduced by the same amount as 6 years worth of benefit fraud.
Why shouldn't people who have paid in for decades get help when they need it?
There have always been dolescum. Oh how we smile at the artful dodger at Christmas a dockhead precursor. Why didn't your beloved Tories do anything about them in the EIGHTEEN YEARS they were in charge?
..sounds like Punks approach this - it's not entirely about quantity, at least Vodafone contribute - anyway, by definition, dolescum don't 'pay in', they just, 'take out'
Your post mixes a few things up, it's obfuscation; benefit FRAUD is not the sole measure, you take no account of what Vodafone create or contribute, the arful dodger lived in very different times and has no relevance.. a pity thing in the end - you introduce genuine claimants when it's not those I speak of, etc etc