Verum wrote:Guest wrote:Verum wrote:Guest wrote:But.............
1979 country in shit,roaring inflation,country on strike,economy stuffed,britain borrowing from IMF and we were an international joke = No money and Tories voted in.
1997 country has rgeained national pride and is a leading global financial centre and economy is booming - Money!!! And Labour get voted in.
2010 The country is ruined and labour lose power and indecisive ge means coalition form parliament to sort yet another fine labour mess.
History repeats itself.
Labour = danger
The lefties on here deny all of the above because the truth hurts.
"During Blair's 10 years in office there were 40 successive quarters of economic growth, lasting until the second quarter of 2008."
Accurate history rather than the shite you talk.
Every bloody country in the world had growth because there was a world wide economic boom.
So if you want Labour to get credit for a world wide economic boom that commenced in the last 2 years of John Majors premiership
You can bloody well claim that labour were responsible went it all went tits up then also!!!
You cant have it both ways fuckwit!!
Some people are just liars and the sad fact is they thin k it is clever to post such shite on here?
So when there's growth under Labour it's because of a world wide economic boom but when there's a world wide economic meltdown it's because of Labour. Is that logic your own invention or did you get help from the Daily Mail?
Question. "When was the last time a Labour Government handed over an economy to a new government that was not a disaster?"
Take your time.